Opportunity Information: Apply for EPA R1 HC 2014
Apply for EPA R1 HC 2014
- The Environmental Protection Agency in the environment sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "2014 HEALTHY COMMUNITIES GRANT PROGRAM" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 66.110 Healthy Communities Grant Program.
- This funding opportunity was created on Mar 15, 2014 and posted on Mar 15, 2014.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Apr 24, 2014 Please refer to the full announcement, including Section IV, for additional information on submission methods and due dates.. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $250,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $25,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 10 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- See Section III of the announcement for additional eligibility information.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The 2014 Healthy Communities Grant Program (Funding Opportunity Number EPA-R1-HC-2014) was EPA New England's primary competitive grant program for working directly with local communities across the six New England states to reduce environmental risks, protect and improve human health, and strengthen overall quality of life. The program was set up to support practical, community-driven projects that do more than raise awareness; applicants were expected to show how their work would lead to measurable environmental and/or public health improvements. EPA framed this as a cooperative agreement opportunity, meaning awardees should be prepared for an active relationship with the agency during the project period rather than a hands-off funding arrangement.
A central theme of the program was directing resources toward communities and populations facing higher risk. EPA emphasized projects that would benefit areas vulnerable to climate change impacts, communities dealing with stormwater runoff issues, and environmental justice areas where potential environmental burdens and health risks may be greater. The grant also prioritized urban communities and sensitive populations, explicitly including children, the elderly, tribes, and other groups considered at increased risk. In practice, this priority focus signals that competitive proposals would be those that clearly identify who is at risk, what the local environmental problem is, and how the proposed work will reduce exposure or improve environmental conditions in a way that can be tracked and verified.
The program goals outlined several types of outcomes and approaches EPA wanted to fund. Projects were expected to assess, better understand, and reduce environmental and human health risks, which could include local data gathering, risk screening, community monitoring, or targeted interventions tied to specific hazards. Another major goal was increasing collaboration through community-based projects, reflecting an expectation that applicants would partner with local organizations, residents, municipalities, schools, health entities, or other stakeholders instead of operating in isolation. EPA also highlighted building institutional and community capacity, meaning projects should leave behind skills, tools, relationships, or systems that help a community keep addressing environmental and health problems after the grant ends. Emergency preparedness and resilience were also called out, indicating interest in efforts that help communities plan for, respond to, and recover from environmental emergencies and climate-related disruptions. Across all these goals, EPA repeatedly stressed measurable benefits, so successful projects would typically define specific indicators or outputs tied to environmental results (for example, reduced runoff impacts, improved local practices, or risk-reduction actions taken) and public health relevance (for example, reduced exposure pathways or better protection for vulnerable groups).
To be eligible as a project under this grant program, proposed work had to take place within the New England states and meet key criteria tied to EPA's priorities. First, the project needed to be located in and/or directly benefit one or more "Target Investment Areas" described in the full announcement. Second, applicants had to explain how the project would achieve measurable environmental and/or public health results in one or more "Target Program Areas," also defined in the announcement. In other words, proposals were not evaluated solely on good intentions or general community benefit; they had to align with EPA's defined investment and program priorities and include a credible plan for demonstrating results.
From a funding standpoint, EPA expected to make about 10 awards under this competition, with an estimated total funding amount of $250,000. Individual awards had a ceiling of $25,000, and the listed award floor was $0, indicating there was no formal minimum award size stated in the summary information. The opportunity included a cost-sharing or matching requirement, so applicants were expected to contribute non-federal resources in some form, consistent with the details in the full solicitation. The CFDA number associated with the program was 66.110 (Healthy Communities Grant Program), and the activity category was Environment.
The opportunity was posted on March 15, 2014, and the application deadline was April 24, 2014, with the opportunity archived on May 24, 2014. Applicants were directed to the full announcement for submission requirements, deadlines, and methods, particularly the detailed instructions typically found in Section IV of federal funding announcements. For questions or help accessing the announcement, the listed EPA New England contact was Sandra Brownell, located at EPA New England in Boston, Massachusetts, with phone, fax, and email contact information provided in the notice.
FAQs: 2014 Healthy Communities Grant Program (EPA-R1-HC-2014)
What is the 2014 Healthy Communities Grant Program (EPA-R1-HC-2014)?
It was EPA New England's primary competitive grant program for working directly with local communities in the six New England states to reduce environmental risks, protect and improve human health, and strengthen overall quality of life.
Which EPA office ran this opportunity?
The program was administered by EPA New England (EPA Region 1).
Is this funding a grant or a cooperative agreement?
EPA framed the opportunity as a cooperative agreement, which means awardees should expect an active relationship with EPA during the project period rather than a hands-off funding arrangement.
What types of projects were EPA looking to fund?
EPA was looking for practical, community-driven projects that go beyond raising awareness and are designed to produce measurable environmental and/or public health improvements.
What does "measurable environmental and/or public health improvements" mean in this program?
The program emphasized defining specific results, indicators, or outputs that can be tracked and verified. Proposals were expected to show how the work would reduce environmental risks and/or improve public health in a way that can be demonstrated.
What communities or populations were prioritized?
EPA emphasized directing resources toward communities and populations facing higher risk. Priorities included areas vulnerable to climate change impacts, communities dealing with stormwater runoff issues, environmental justice areas with potentially greater burdens and risks, and urban communities.
Which "sensitive populations" did the opportunity explicitly call out?
The notice explicitly included children, the elderly, tribes, and other groups considered at increased risk.
What were the main program goals or focus areas?
The goals included assessing, better understanding, and reducing environmental and human health risks; increasing collaboration through community-based projects; building institutional and community capacity; and supporting emergency preparedness and resilience related to environmental emergencies and climate-related disruptions.
Does the program support data gathering or monitoring activities?
Yes. Examples of approaches mentioned included local data gathering, risk screening, community monitoring, and targeted interventions tied to specific hazards, as long as they contribute to measurable environmental and/or public health results.
Was collaboration required or encouraged?
Collaboration was strongly emphasized. EPA highlighted community-based projects and expected applicants to partner with local organizations, residents, municipalities, schools, health entities, and/or other stakeholders rather than operate in isolation.
What does "capacity building" mean in the context of this program?
Capacity building was described as leaving behind skills, tools, relationships, or systems that help a community continue addressing environmental and health problems after the grant ends.
Were emergency preparedness and resilience projects eligible?
Emergency preparedness and resilience were specifically called out, indicating interest in projects that help communities plan for, respond to, and recover from environmental emergencies and climate-related disruptions.
Where did projects have to take place?
Proposed work had to take place within the New England states.
Did projects need to serve specific geographic or program priorities?
Yes. Projects had to be located in and/or directly benefit one or more "Target Investment Areas" and had to achieve measurable environmental and/or public health results in one or more "Target Program Areas," as defined in the full announcement.
Could an applicant propose a project based only on general community benefit?
No. The notice indicates proposals were not evaluated solely on good intentions or general community benefit; they needed to align with EPA's defined investment and program priorities and include a credible plan for demonstrating measurable results.
How many awards did EPA expect to make?
EPA expected to make about 10 awards under this competition.
What was the estimated total funding available?
The estimated total funding amount listed was $250,000.
What was the maximum award amount per project?
The award ceiling was $25,000 per award.
Was there a minimum award size?
The listed award floor was $0, meaning no formal minimum award size was stated in the summary information.
Was cost share or matching required?
Yes. The opportunity included a cost-sharing or matching requirement, so applicants were expected to contribute non-federal resources in some form, consistent with the details in the full solicitation.
What is the CFDA number for this program?
The CFDA number associated with the program was 66.110 (Healthy Communities Grant Program).
What was the activity category?
The activity category listed for the opportunity was Environment.
When was the opportunity posted and when were applications due?
The opportunity was posted on March 15, 2014, and the application deadline was April 24, 2014.
Is this opportunity still open?
No. The notice indicates the opportunity was archived on May 24, 2014.
Where were applicants directed for submission requirements and instructions?
Applicants were directed to the full announcement for submission requirements, deadlines, and methods, including the detailed instructions typically found in Section IV of federal funding announcements.
Who was the EPA contact for questions about this opportunity?
The listed EPA New England contact was Sandra Brownell in Boston, Massachusetts, with phone, fax, and email contact information provided in the notice.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Environment
Next opportunity: Request for Information
Previous opportunity: Safety Center for Excellence Rural and Surface Transportation
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for EPA R1 HC 2014
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (EPA R1 HC 2014) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| San Francisco Bay Water Quality Improvement Fund (FY2014 Funds) Apply for EPA R9 WTR3 14 01 Funding Number: EPA R9 WTR3 14 01 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $2,000,000 |
| FY14 Region 5 Wetland Program Development Grants Apply for EPA R5 WPDG 2014 Funding Number: EPA R5 WPDG 2014 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $500,000 |
| Fisheries Integration of Society and Habitats (FISH) Apply for RFA 612 14 000002 Funding Number: RFA 612 14 000002 Agency: Malawi USAID Lilongwe Category: Environment Funding Amount: $14,000,000 |
| FY14 Region 2 Wetland Program Development Grants Apply for EPA REG2 14 WPDG Funding Number: EPA REG2 14 WPDG Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $300,000 |
| West Shore Conservancy Harbor Lights Preserve Apply for F14AS00130 Funding Number: F14AS00130 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $44,718 |
| Smart Growth Information Clearinghouse Apply for EPA AO OP OSC 14 01 Funding Number: EPA AO OP OSC 14 01 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $150,000 |
| Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Program Yuma Area Apply for R14AS00035 Funding Number: R14AS00035 Agency: Bureau of Reclamation Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| Chesapeake Bay Program Office Fiscal Year 2014 Request for Proposals for Support for Small Watershed Programs and Support for the Innovative and Nutrient Sediment Reduction Programs Apply for EPA R3 CBP 14 04 Funding Number: EPA R3 CBP 14 04 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $10,000,000 |
| Submerged Marine Habitat Mapping Apply for P14AS00064 Funding Number: P14AS00064 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Institutional Research Forums on Atmospheric, Climate, and Ocean Sciences Apply for NOAA OAR OHQ 2014 2004054 Funding Number: NOAA OAR OHQ 2014 2004054 Agency: Department of Commerce Category: Environment Funding Amount: $429,226 |
| Development of Desert Tortoise Adoption Program Apply for F14AS00150 Funding Number: F14AS00150 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $41,800 |
| 2014 EPA GREATER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES (GRO) FELLOWSHIPS FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Apply for EPA F2014U GRO P1 Funding Number: EPA F2014U GRO P1 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| 2014 EPA GREATER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES (GRO) FELLOWSHIPS FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Apply for EPA F2014U GRO P2 Funding Number: EPA F2014U GRO P2 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| 2014 EPA GREATER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES (GRO) FELLOWSHIPS FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Apply for EPA F2014U GRO P3 Funding Number: EPA F2014U GRO P3 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| 2014 EPA GREATER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES (GRO) FELLOWSHIPS FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Apply for EPA F2014U GRO P4 Funding Number: EPA F2014U GRO P4 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| 2014 EPA GREATER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES (GRO) FELLOWSHIPS FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Apply for EPA F2014U GRO Q1 Funding Number: EPA F2014U GRO Q1 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| 2014 EPA GREATER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES (GRO) FELLOWSHIPS FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY Apply for EPA F2014U GRO Q2 Funding Number: EPA F2014U GRO Q2 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| FY 2014 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM FOR TRIBES Apply for EPA OSWER ORCR 14 04 Funding Number: EPA OSWER ORCR 14 04 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $74,750 |
| BLM OR WA Air Quality Modeling Western States, Oregon State Office Apply for L14AS00072 Funding Number: L14AS00072 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Environment Funding Amount: $120,000 |
| Recovery activities for the Karner Blue Butterfly (KBB) in Concord, NH. CFDA 15.650 Apply for F14AS00168 Funding Number: F14AS00168 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $184,500 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "EPA R1 HC 2014", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.