Opportunity Information: Apply for USDA NRCS CA 14 0008

  • The California State Office in the natural resources sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "CA Conservation Innovation Grant 2014" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 10.912 Environmental Quality Incentives Program.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Feb 12, 2014 and posted on Feb 12, 2014.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Mar 14, 2014. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $375,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $75,000.00 in funding.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 5 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: County governments Individuals Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized) City or township governments State governments Special district governments Public and State controlled institutions of higher education Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education.
Apply for USDA NRCS CA 14 0008

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

The CA Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) 2014 opportunity is a USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) funding program aimed at speeding up the real-world use of innovative conservation practices and technologies in California. The central idea is not to pay for basic research, but to help applicants take conservation methods that are already proven (or have enough evidence behind them to show a high likelihood of success) and demonstrate, adapt, and validate them under field conditions so they can be adopted more widely. NRCS expects these projects to produce results that can be transferred into NRCS practice standards, technical references, manuals, and planning tools, or otherwise move into broad private-sector use. The grant is offered as a cooperative agreement and is tied legislatively to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), authorized under the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008.

Funding for the California competition in FY 2014 was anticipated to total up to $375,000, with roughly five awards expected. Individual awards were projected to range from $25,000 to $75,000. Projects could run from one to three years, and a cost-share or matching contribution is required, meaning grantees must bring non-federal resources to the project rather than relying entirely on federal dollars. The goal is to leverage federal investment to achieve practical environmental improvements alongside agricultural production, such as better soil function, cleaner water, improved air quality, and more efficient energy and water use.

Eligibility is broad and includes federally recognized Tribes, individuals, nonprofit organizations (including 501(c)(3)s), state and local governments (including counties, cities/townships, special districts), and public/state-controlled institutions of higher education. While the eligible applicant pool is wide, proposals must be California-based and should be designed with a clear understanding of NRCS conservation practice standards, planning criteria, and assessment tools, with outputs that can strengthen or augment NRCS technical guidance. NRCS points applicants to the California electronic Field Office Technical Guide (eFOTG) as the core reference for aligning projects with agency standards and implementation expectations.

The application process is structured as a two-phase statewide competition. First, applicants submit a pre-proposal, and NRCS screens submissions for completeness and compliance; incomplete applications are removed from consideration. Pre-proposals that pass screening are then evaluated on how well they use innovative technologies or approaches to address at least one of the state’s priority topic areas. Only applicants selected during this pre-proposal phase are invited to submit a full proposal. Full proposals are reviewed by a technical peer review panel using the program’s evaluation criteria, then forwarded with that review to the California Review Board, which makes recommendations to the NRCS State Conservationist for final award decisions.

Key dates for this 2014 cycle were tightly defined. Pre-proposals were due by 4:00 p.m. on March 14, 2014. NRCS planned to announce which pre-proposals were selected by April 18, 2014. Those selected were then required to submit full proposals by 4:00 p.m. on June 6, 2014. Submissions could be made by mail or courier to the USDA NRCS office in Davis, California, or electronically through Grants.gov or by email as specified in the notice.

In terms of what NRCS is actually looking to fund, the program emphasizes on-the-ground conservation demonstrations, pilot efforts, evaluation, implementation, and monitoring. Competitive projects are expected to show environmental effectiveness and practical usability, including affordability and adoption potential, rather than being purely experimental. The notice highlights several ways a project can qualify as “innovative” for CIG purposes: demonstrating a proven technology in a new setting, adapting an approach to improve performance and adoption, bringing a successful system from another region or agricultural sector into California, or producing results and methods that are clearly transferable to other producers, land managers, or agencies.

California’s priority topics for this funding round span multiple resource areas. Under planning technology, NRCS specifically calls out demonstrations of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with remote sensing tools (such as digital video, infrared, and other sensors) to evaluate impacts and monitor conservation treatments across cropland, pasture, forestland, and rangeland. Soil health priorities include side-by-side comparisons of traditional surface irrigation systems versus no-till systems using center pivot or linear irrigation, integrated approaches for increasing soil organic matter in intensive vegetable systems, rapid field assessment methods for soil health, and demonstrations linking improved soil biology to reduced nitrate losses, improved irrigation efficiency, and alternatives to soil fumigation that protect soil structure and biology. Forest soil health is also included, with interest in suites of practices that improve long-term site quality and productivity.

Water quality priorities focus heavily on reducing nutrients, pesticides, and sediment leaving irrigated lands, including conservation systems that may use approaches like bioreactors, biological pest control, and vegetated ditches. NRCS also seeks projects that improve monitoring and documentation of water-quality outcomes from conservation practices, develop better manure application timing and uniformity, improve grazing management to protect water on rangelands and pasture, and build forest management prescriptions that improve water quality. Additional emphasis is placed on developing criteria and guidance to help producers detect or indicate nitrate leaching below the root zone, calibrating NRCS assessment tools such as the Water Quality Index for Agriculture, integrating pollinator habitat with runoff and erosion control benefits, improving nitrogen management to protect groundwater, and even exploring practical methods to use nitrates already present in groundwater as a fertilizer source.

Water quantity priorities include improved on-farm irrigation flow measurement methods that support scheduling and performance evaluation, innovative irrigation scheduling tools, and evaluation approaches for subsurface drip irrigation system performance. The notice also highlights forest vegetation management strategies intended to increase water yield or extend downstream release while still maintaining ecosystem services like water quality, soil health, pest resilience, and wildlife benefits. For rangelands, NRCS is interested in practices and livestock management prescriptions that both improve water quality and increase effective water retention and storage.

Other topic areas broaden the program into forest and climate resilience and operational efficiency. For plant quality, an example priority is developing a minimum set of forest health indicators by forest type for the California Forest Health Scorecard, with an emphasis on balancing ecosystem services and economic viability. For air quality and climate change, priorities include practical soil amendments like compost or biochar to increase water-holding capacity and soil organic matter, paired with monitoring methods to estimate greenhouse gas reductions, carbon sequestration, or soil decontamination benefits. The notice also encourages drought adaptation strategies for crop systems, including dealing with salinity intrusion and timing mismatches between flowering and pollination, and it highlights conservation tillage as a strategy that can reduce fuel use, build soil organic matter, and potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions if paired with credible monitoring. Additional air-quality interests include the transferability of infrared and aerial imagery technologies for real-time planning to reduce emissions, systems that quantify emissions reductions from farm operations using GIS or similar tools, and proven systems that reduce fossil fuel use while addressing NRCS air-quality concerns.

Energy conservation and waste recycling are also prominent. NRCS seeks projects demonstrating greenhouse gas reductions through on-farm renewable energy (such as solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, and biomass-related systems), comprehensive comparisons of energy use between different farming systems, innovative ways to expand effective energy audits and efficiency upgrades, and feasibility assessments for biomass-to-energy pathways (including anaerobic digestion and other conversion technologies). There is also interest in irrigation-related energy savings through telemetry-enabled soil moisture monitoring networks and automation. Under waste recycling/resource conservation, the notice emphasizes technologies and systems to recycle excess biomass into useful products (including biochar and energy products), biomass recycling systems that reduce fire hazards and lower conservation practice installation costs, and California-specific development or demonstration tied to Conservation Practice Standard 633 (Waste Recycling), including producing practical specifications, job sheets, and system plans.

Wildlife-focused priorities include integrating habitat management into working agricultural landscapes in ways that support broader ecosystem services, as well as several very practical applied demonstrations such as durable alternatives to wood fence corner posts that provide raptor perches, and modifications or caps for open pipes used in conservation practices to reduce wildlife trapping. The notice also points to building out ecological site description resources by linking wildlife species to ecological site descriptions at the land resource unit level, and evaluating grazing as a habitat management tool for species such as sage grouse in meadows and sagebrush communities.

For applicants, the practical takeaway is that NRCS is looking for field-ready demonstrations with measurable outcomes, clear monitoring plans, and a strong pathway to adoption and technology transfer, all grounded in NRCS standards and California resource priorities. Projects that simply test a hypothesis or operate like academic research without a near-term implementation and adoption pathway are explicitly not a fit for this program. Contact and submission details in the notice route questions and applications to the California NRCS CIG program staff in Davis, including the listed state CIG program manager and grants specialist.

CA Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) 2014 - FAQs

What is the CA Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) 2014 program?

The CA Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) 2014 opportunity is a USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) funding program focused on speeding up the real-world use of innovative conservation practices and technologies in California. The emphasis is on field demonstration, adaptation, validation, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of approaches that are already proven or supported by strong evidence.

What is the main purpose of CIG funding?

The program is designed to move practical conservation innovations into wider use by producers, land managers, and other stakeholders. NRCS expects funded projects to generate results that can be transferred into NRCS practice standards, technical references, manuals, and planning tools, or otherwise be adopted broadly in the private sector.

Is CIG intended to fund basic research?

No. The program is specifically described as not paying for basic research. Projects should be focused on demonstrating, adapting, validating, and documenting conservation methods under field conditions so they can be adopted more widely.

What kind of agreement is used for this grant?

The grant is offered as a cooperative agreement.

How is CIG connected to EQIP?

The opportunity is tied legislatively to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and is authorized under the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008.

How much funding was anticipated for California in FY 2014?

Funding for the California competition in FY 2014 was anticipated to total up to $375,000.

How many awards were expected?

NRCS expected roughly five awards for this California funding round.

What was the projected award size?

Individual awards were projected to range from $25,000 to $75,000.

How long can a project last?

Projects could run from one to three years.

Is a cost-share or match required?

Yes. A cost-share or matching contribution is required, meaning grantees must bring non-federal resources to the project rather than relying entirely on federal dollars.

What outcomes is NRCS trying to achieve with these projects?

The goal is to leverage federal investment to achieve practical environmental improvements alongside agricultural production. Examples mentioned include better soil function, cleaner water, improved air quality, and more efficient energy and water use.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility includes federally recognized Tribes, individuals, nonprofit organizations (including 501(c)(3)s), state and local governments (including counties, cities/townships, and special districts), and public/state-controlled institutions of higher education.

Do projects need to be based in California?

Yes. Proposals must be California-based.

What should applicants align their projects with?

Projects should be designed with a clear understanding of NRCS conservation practice standards, planning criteria, and assessment tools. Outputs are expected to strengthen or augment NRCS technical guidance.

What is the eFOTG and why does it matter for applicants?

NRCS points applicants to the California electronic Field Office Technical Guide (eFOTG) as the core reference for aligning projects with NRCS standards and implementation expectations.

How does the application process work?

The application process is a two-phase statewide competition. First, applicants submit a pre-proposal. NRCS screens pre-proposals for completeness and compliance; incomplete applications are removed from consideration. Pre-proposals that pass screening are evaluated against the state priority topic areas, and only selected applicants are invited to submit a full proposal.

What happens after a pre-proposal is selected?

Applicants selected during the pre-proposal phase are invited to submit a full proposal, which is reviewed by a technical peer review panel using program evaluation criteria. The panel review is forwarded to the California Review Board, which makes recommendations to the NRCS State Conservationist for final award decisions.

What were the key dates for the 2014 cycle?

  • Pre-proposals due: 4:00 p.m., March 14, 2014
  • Planned announcement of selected pre-proposals: April 18, 2014
  • Full proposals due (for invited applicants): 4:00 p.m., June 6, 2014

How could applications be submitted?

Submissions could be made by mail or courier to the USDA NRCS office in Davis, California, or electronically through Grants.gov or by email as specified in the notice.

What types of projects is NRCS looking to fund?

The program emphasizes on-the-ground conservation demonstrations, pilot efforts, evaluation, implementation, and monitoring. Competitive projects are expected to show environmental effectiveness and practical usability, including affordability and adoption potential.

What does NRCS mean by “innovative” for CIG purposes?

The notice describes several ways a project can qualify as innovative, including:

  • Demonstrating a proven technology in a new setting
  • Adapting an approach to improve performance and adoption
  • Bringing a successful system from another region or agricultural sector into California
  • Producing results and methods that are transferable to other producers, land managers, or agencies

What is the “planning technology” priority area mentioned?

Under planning technology, NRCS calls out demonstrations of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with remote sensing tools (such as digital video, infrared, and other sensors) to evaluate impacts and monitor conservation treatments across cropland, pasture, forestland, and rangeland.

What soil health priorities were included in this round?

Soil health priorities included side-by-side comparisons of traditional surface irrigation systems versus no-till systems using center pivot or linear irrigation; integrated approaches to increase soil organic matter in intensive vegetable systems; rapid field assessment methods for soil health; and demonstrations linking improved soil biology to reduced nitrate losses, improved irrigation efficiency, and alternatives to soil fumigation that protect soil structure and biology. Forest soil health was also included, with interest in suites of practices that improve long-term site quality and productivity.

What water quality priorities were included?

Water quality priorities emphasized reducing nutrients, pesticides, and sediment leaving irrigated lands, including conservation systems that may use bioreactors, biological pest control, and vegetated ditches. NRCS also highlighted improved monitoring and documentation of water-quality outcomes, better manure application timing and uniformity, improved grazing management to protect water on rangelands and pasture, and forest management prescriptions that improve water quality.

Did the notice mention improving nitrate monitoring or assessment tools?

Yes. The notice emphasized developing criteria and guidance to help producers detect or indicate nitrate leaching below the root zone, calibrating NRCS assessment tools such as the Water Quality Index for Agriculture, improving nitrogen management to protect groundwater, and exploring practical methods to use nitrates already present in groundwater as a fertilizer source.

What water quantity priorities were included?

Water quantity priorities included improved on-farm irrigation flow measurement methods that support scheduling and performance evaluation, innovative irrigation scheduling tools, and evaluation approaches for subsurface drip irrigation system performance. The notice also highlighted forest vegetation management strategies intended to increase water yield or extend downstream release while maintaining ecosystem services.

Did rangelands have specific priorities in the notice?

Yes. For rangelands, NRCS expressed interest in practices and livestock management prescriptions that improve water quality and increase effective water retention and storage.

What plant quality priorities were mentioned?

Under plant quality, an example priority was developing a minimum set of forest health indicators by forest type for the California Forest Health Scorecard, with an emphasis on balancing ecosystem services and economic viability.

What air quality and climate change priorities were included?

Priorities included practical soil amendments such as compost or biochar to increase water-holding capacity and soil organic matter, paired with monitoring methods to estimate greenhouse gas reductions, carbon sequestration, or soil decontamination benefits. The notice also encouraged drought adaptation strategies for crop systems (including salinity intrusion and timing mismatches between flowering and pollination) and highlighted conservation tillage paired with credible monitoring as a potential greenhouse gas reduction strategy.

Did the notice mention infrared or aerial imagery for emissions planning?

Yes. It encouraged transferability of infrared and aerial imagery technologies for real-time planning to reduce emissions and systems that quantify emissions reductions from farm operations using GIS or similar tools.

What energy conservation priorities were included?

NRCS sought projects demonstrating greenhouse gas reductions through on-farm renewable energy (solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, and biomass-related systems), comparisons of energy use between farming systems, approaches to expand effective energy audits and efficiency upgrades, and feasibility assessments for biomass-to-energy pathways such as anaerobic digestion and other conversion technologies.

Were irrigation-related energy savings mentioned?

Yes. The notice included interest in irrigation-related energy savings through telemetry-enabled soil moisture monitoring networks and automation.

What waste recycling/resource conservation priorities were included?

The notice emphasized technologies and systems to recycle excess biomass into useful products (including biochar and energy products), biomass recycling systems that reduce fire hazards and lower conservation practice installation costs, and California-specific development or demonstration tied to Conservation Practice Standard 633 (Waste Recycling), including producing practical specifications, job sheets, and system plans.

What wildlife priorities were included?

Wildlife priorities included integrating habitat management into working agricultural landscapes to support broader ecosystem services. The notice also highlighted applied demonstrations such as durable alternatives to wood fence corner posts that provide raptor perches, and modifications or caps for open pipes used in conservation practices to reduce wildlife trapping. It also mentioned linking wildlife species to ecological site descriptions at the land resource unit level and evaluating grazing as a habitat management tool for species such as sage grouse.

What makes a project competitive under this opportunity?

Based on the notice, competitive projects are field-ready demonstrations with measurable outcomes, clear monitoring plans, practical usability (including affordability), and a strong pathway to adoption and technology transfer. They should be grounded in NRCS standards and California priority resource concerns.

What types of projects are explicitly not a fit?

Projects that simply test a hypothesis or operate like academic research without a near-term implementation and adoption pathway are described as not a fit for this program.

Where are questions and submissions routed?

The notice routes questions and applications to the California NRCS CIG program staff in Davis, including the listed state CIG program manager and grants specialist.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: California State Office

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Natural Resources

Next opportunity: 3 State Air Quality Study

Previous opportunity: Youth Crew Stoll Trail Rehabilitation July 2014

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for USDA NRCS CA 14 0008

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (USDA NRCS CA 14 0008) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
WY Conservation Innovation Program Apply for USDA NRCS WY 14 0001

Funding Number: USDA NRCS WY 14 0001
Agency: California State Office
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $75,000
Conservation Innovation Grant New Hampshire Apply for USDA NRCS NH 14 0001

Funding Number: USDA NRCS NH 14 0001
Agency: California State Office
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $75,000
Seabirds as Indicators of Coastal Ecosystem Condition and Change Apply for P14AS00065

Funding Number: P14AS00065
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $75,522
State Conservation Innovation Grant 2014 Apply for USDA NRCS VT 14 0001

Funding Number: USDA NRCS VT 14 0001
Agency: California State Office
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $75,000
Shorebirds Study, Western Arctic Parklands Apply for P14AS00118

Funding Number: P14AS00118
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $33,926
Conservation Innovation Grant New Hampshire Apply for USDA NRCS NH 14 0002

Funding Number: USDA NRCS NH 14 0002
Agency: California State Office
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $75,000
BLM AZ Gila District Youth Internships and Public Land Corps Opportunities Apply for L14AS00149

Funding Number: L14AS00149
Agency: Bureau of Land Management
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $900,000
Necedah National Wildlife Refuge Whooping Crane Forced Renesting to Prevent Population Extinction Apply for F14AS00321

Funding Number: F14AS00321
Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
BLM AZ Gila District Youth Internships and Public Land Corps Opportunities Apply for L14AS00276

Funding Number: L14AS00276
Agency: Bureau of Land Management
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $900,000
BLM AZ Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail Management Partnership Apply for L14AS00304

Funding Number: L14AS00304
Agency: Bureau of Land Management
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $100,000
Fish Screen Corrective Action and Improvements Apply for R14AN20025

Funding Number: R14AN20025
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $2,100,000
Create Model of Glacier Bays Late Pleistocene Coastline Apply for P14AS00298

Funding Number: P14AS00298
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $95,561
Conservation Innovation Grant 2015 Apply for USDA NRCS CA 15 0009

Funding Number: USDA NRCS CA 15 0009
Agency: California State Office
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $75,000
South Shore Service Yard California State Parks Apply for 15AN20006

Funding Number: 15AN20006
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $1,383,451
Open Space Management Apply for R15AN20014

Funding Number: R15AN20014
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $49,755
Endangered Species Program Support Upper Klamath Lake (UKL) Apply for R15AN20010

Funding Number: R15AN20010
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $2,651,656
Extending Alaska Region National Hydrography Dataset Editing Protocols and Data Production to Accommodate Wetlands and other Value Added Attributes Apply for NPS DOIP15AC00448

Funding Number: NPS DOIP15AC00448
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $400,000
Westside Regional Drainage Plan San Joaquin River Salinity Management 2015 Financial Assistance Agreement Apply for R15AN20005

Funding Number: R15AN20005
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $3,750,000
Watershed Rehabilitation and Sediment Control Apply for R15AN20026

Funding Number: R15AN20026
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $1,331,126
Weed Management and Jobs Creation Project, Phase 2 Apply for R15AN20017

Funding Number: R15AN20017
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation
Category: Natural Resources
Funding Amount: $1,499,181

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "USDA NRCS CA 14 0008", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.