Opportunity Information: Apply for EPA OAR CPPD 10 09
Apply for EPA OAR CPPD 10 09
- The Environmental Protection Agency in the environment sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "CLIMATE SHOWCASE COMMUNITIES" and is now available to receive applicants.
- This funding opportunity was created on Jun 8, 2010 and posted on Jun 8, 2010.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 26, 2010 Please refer to the full announcement, including Section IV for additional information on submission methods and due dates.. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $10,000,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $500,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 30 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- See Section III of the announcement for additional eligibility information.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Climate Showcase Communities grant opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number EPA OAR CPPD 10 09) was a discretionary funding program run by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to support practical, on-the-ground local climate solutions. The program focused on helping local governments and tribal governments move beyond general climate goals and into real planning, demonstrations, and implemented projects that measurably reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A key theme of the opportunity was that funded work should not only cut emissions, but also deliver additional benefits that communities care about in everyday life, such as improved environmental conditions, economic gains, public health improvements, and broader community or social benefits.
The central purpose of the Climate Showcase Communities program was to produce replicable models of sustainable community action. In other words, EPA was looking for projects that could serve as examples other communities could copy, showing that the approach is cost-effective, produces ongoing (persistent) greenhouse gas reductions, and improves local conditions at the same time. The emphasis on replication means proposals were expected to demonstrate how results, methods, and lessons learned could translate to other places, rather than being one-off efforts that only work in a narrow setting.
Funding was provided through cooperative agreements, which typically means EPA expected to have substantial involvement during the project period compared with a standard grant. The opportunity anticipated making about 30 awards with an estimated total funding amount of $10,000,000. Individual awards were expected to range from a floor of $100,000 up to a ceiling of $500,000. The opportunity required cost sharing or matching funds, so applicants needed to plan for contributing non-federal resources and to document how matching requirements would be met as part of the project budget and financing approach.
Eligibility was not limited to a single applicant type in the short summary, but the description makes clear the program was aimed at supporting local and tribal government-led efforts, and the formal eligibility rules were provided in Section III of the full announcement. The funding activity category was Environment, aligning the competition with projects that combine climate mitigation with co-benefits such as cleaner air, healthier communities, and local economic resilience.
Key timeline details show the announcement was posted June 8, 2010, with an application closing date of July 26, 2010. The archive date was August 25, 2010, indicating the opportunity is no longer open. For applicants at the time, the notice pointed readers to the full announcement, especially Section IV, for the official submission methods, required components, and specific due date instructions. A contact was provided for access issues: Jeanette Shepherd at (202) 343-9792.
In practical terms, a strong proposal under this opportunity would have clearly defined actions (planning, demonstration, and/or implementation), a credible approach for quantifying and sustaining greenhouse gas reductions, and a straightforward explanation of the added community benefits. It also would have emphasized how the project could be replicated elsewhere, supported by a realistic budget within the $100,000 to $500,000 range and a well-documented plan to satisfy the matching requirement.
Climate Showcase Communities Grant (EPA OAR CPPD 10 09) - FAQs
What is the Climate Showcase Communities grant opportunity?
The Climate Showcase Communities grant opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number EPA OAR CPPD 10 09) was a discretionary funding program run by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to support practical, on-the-ground local climate solutions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and deliver community co-benefits.
What was the main goal of this program?
The central purpose was to help communities move beyond broad climate goals into real planning, demonstrations, and implemented projects that measurably reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while also improving local conditions.
What types of activities were supported (planning vs. implementation)?
The opportunity emphasized clearly defined actions that could include planning, demonstration projects, and/or implementation of projects, as long as the work produced measurable greenhouse gas reductions and meaningful community benefits.
What did EPA mean by "practical, on-the-ground local climate solutions"?
Based on the description, EPA was seeking projects with real-world actions and results (not just general goals), where the work could be planned, demonstrated, and/or implemented in a way that produces measurable greenhouse gas reductions.
Were greenhouse gas emission reductions required?
Yes. The funded work was expected to measurably reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and strong proposals would include a credible approach for quantifying reductions and showing that reductions would be sustained over time.
What are "co-benefits" in the context of this program?
Co-benefits were additional outcomes communities care about in everyday life, beyond greenhouse gas reductions. The opportunity highlighted examples such as improved environmental conditions, economic gains, public health improvements, and broader community or social benefits.
What does "replicable models" mean for this grant?
EPA was looking for projects that could serve as examples other communities could copy. Proposals were expected to show how results, methods, and lessons learned could translate to other places, rather than being one-off projects that only work in a narrow setting.
Why was replication emphasized so strongly?
The program aimed to produce models of sustainable community action that demonstrate cost-effectiveness, persistent (ongoing) greenhouse gas reductions, and local improvements, so that other communities could adopt similar approaches.
What was the funding mechanism used by EPA?
Funding was provided through cooperative agreements, which typically indicates EPA expected substantial involvement during the project period compared with a standard grant.
How many awards did EPA expect to make?
The opportunity anticipated making about 30 awards.
What was the total estimated funding amount for the program?
The estimated total funding amount was $10,000,000.
What was the expected award size?
Individual awards were expected to range from a floor of $100,000 to a ceiling of $500,000.
Was cost sharing or matching required?
Yes. The opportunity required cost sharing or matching funds, meaning applicants needed to contribute non-federal resources and document how matching requirements would be met as part of the project budget and financing approach.
Who was this opportunity intended to support?
The description indicates the program was aimed at supporting local government and tribal government-led efforts. The formal eligibility rules were provided in Section III of the full announcement.
Where were the official eligibility rules described?
Eligibility details were provided in Section III of the full funding announcement.
What was the funding activity category?
The funding activity category was Environment, reflecting projects that combine climate mitigation with co-benefits like cleaner air, healthier communities, and local economic resilience.
When was the announcement posted?
The announcement was posted on June 8, 2010.
What was the application closing date?
The application closing date was July 26, 2010.
Is this funding opportunity still open?
No. The archive date was August 25, 2010, which indicates the opportunity is no longer open.
Where were the official submission instructions and required application components listed?
The notice directed applicants to the full announcement, especially Section IV, for official submission methods, required components, and specific due date instructions.
Who should applicants contact for access issues related to the announcement?
The notice provided a contact for access issues: Jeanette Shepherd at (202) 343-9792.
What would a strong proposal have included under this opportunity?
A strong proposal would have included clearly defined actions (planning, demonstration, and/or implementation), a credible method for quantifying and sustaining greenhouse gas reductions, a clear explanation of added community benefits, a strong replication plan, a realistic budget within the $100,000 to $500,000 range, and a well-documented plan to meet the matching requirement.
What does "persistent" greenhouse gas reductions mean in this context?
In this opportunity, "persistent" refers to ongoing greenhouse gas reductions that continue beyond a short-term effect, supported by a credible approach for sustaining the reductions over time.
Did EPA expect projects to be cost-effective?
Yes. The program description emphasizes that funded projects should demonstrate an approach that is cost-effective and produces ongoing greenhouse gas reductions while improving local conditions.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Environment
Next opportunity: Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR) Phase I Commercialization Assistance Program (CAP)
Previous opportunity: Technical Assistance on Data Collection General Supervision Enhancement Grants Alternate Academic Achievement Standards CFDA Number 84.373X
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for EPA OAR CPPD 10 09
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (EPA OAR CPPD 10 09) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Pesticides and National Strategies for Healthcare Providers, Clinical Training Program Request for Applications (RFA) Apply for EPA OPP 2010 004 Funding Number: EPA OPP 2010 004 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| International Symposium on Genetic Biocontrol of Invasive Fish Apply for CAP UM 2010 Funding Number: CAP UM 2010 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| Lesser long nosed bat surveys Apply for LLNB CA 2010 Funding Number: LLNB CA 2010 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $69,000 |
| Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program (PESP) Regional Grants Apply for EPA OPP 10 005 Funding Number: EPA OPP 10 005 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Great Egg Harbor River conservation Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0011 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0011 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $134,000 |
| Delaware River Watershed Protection Initiative Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0010 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0010 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| Legacy Resource Management Program Apply for W9132T 10 LEGACYRFP Funding Number: W9132T 10 LEGACYRFP Agency: Dept. of the Army Corps of Engineers Category: Environment Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FA AZ State Joint Fire Science Remote Sensing Apply for L10AS00137 Funding Number: L10AS00137 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Environment Funding Amount: $465,000 |
| Musconetcong River conservation Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0009 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0009 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $102,000 |
| Migratory Bird Joint Ventures Gulf Coast Joint Venture Fiscal Year 2009 Apply for FWS R4 10 004 Funding Number: FWS R4 10 004 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $280,942 |
| Potomac Highlands Implementation Grant Apply for EPA R3 EAD 10 05 Funding Number: EPA R3 EAD 10 05 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Facilitating Tribal Climate Change Adaptation Planning and Communicating Climate Change Impacts Apply for EPA OAR CCD 10 09 Funding Number: EPA OAR CCD 10 09 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $150,000 |
| Development of a handicapped accessible pedestrian walkway along the Merrimack River Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0015 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0015 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $1,790,172 |
| Johnstown Area preservation and heritage Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0014 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0014 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $45,000 |
| Cooperatively plan, design, operate, and evaluate public transportation systems in Acadia National Park Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0017 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0017 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $804,000 |
| Cape Cod Shoreline Change and Resource Protection Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0016 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0016 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $54,000 |
| Center of Collaborative Policy Apply for CALCC 1001 Funding Number: CALCC 1001 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $229,072 |
| Aravaipa Creek Native Fish Monitoring under DSCESU Apply for L10AS00151 Funding Number: L10AS00151 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Environment Funding Amount: $12,500 |
| Greenhouse Gas Reporting Systems Outreach to Reporting Facilities and Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Opportunities Apply for EPA OAR CCD 10 05 Funding Number: EPA OAR CCD 10 05 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area Apply for NPS 10 NERO 0019 Funding Number: NPS 10 NERO 0019 Agency: National Park Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $150,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "EPA OAR CPPD 10 09", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.