Opportunity Information: Apply for CIG USDA NRCS UTAH FY10
Apply for CIG USDA NRCS UTAH FY10
- The Utah State Office in the agriculture energy environment information and statistics natural resources science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) Utah 2010" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 10.912 Environmental Quality Incentives Program.
- This funding opportunity was created on Apr 27, 2010 and posted on Apr 27, 2010.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 1, 2010 TWO State Proposal 1 Submit Pre Proposal no later than 5/14/2010. 2 If notified by NRCS (no later than 5/28/2010) that project was chosen for consideration, prepare a Full Proposal and submit Full Proposal no later than 7/1/2010.. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $350,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $75,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 6 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education Special district governments Private institutions of higher education Public and State controlled institutions of higher education Small businesses State governments County governments Individuals Native American tribal governments (Federally recognized) Independent school districts City or township governments For profit organizations other than small businesses.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) Utah 2010 opportunity was a discretionary grant program offered through the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Utah State Office. Its core aim was to speed up the real-world use of innovative conservation practices and technologies that improve environmental outcomes while still supporting agricultural production. In practical terms, the program was meant to help move workable conservation solutions from “this has been shown to work” into broader adoption, either by being incorporated into NRCS policy and technical resources (such as manuals, guides, and references) or by being taken up in the private sector. A key theme of the grant was leveraging federal investment, meaning projects were expected to make NRCS dollars go further by pairing them with partner expertise, additional funding, or on-the-ground capacity.
CIG Utah 2010 placed a clear boundary around what it would and would not fund. It explicitly did not support research in the traditional sense. Projects designed to create or test a new hypothesis, or to explore whether something might work, were not eligible. Instead, the grant targeted application and demonstration of proven approaches, technologies, or management systems that had already been studied enough to show a strong likelihood of success. In other words, CIG functioned as an “implementation and adoption accelerator,” not an early-stage R&D program. The expectation was that successful projects would be good candidates for eventual technology transfer, institutionalization, or scaling through NRCS programs and guidance.
The program emphasized “innovative on-the-ground conservation,” including pilot projects and field demonstrations. That focus signals that proposals needed to be practical, field-ready, and designed to show measurable conservation results in real operating conditions. The opportunity also highlighted the value of sharing skills, knowledge, technologies, and facilities across communities, governments, and institutions so that conservation advances would be accessible to more users. That framing strongly favors collaborative projects that can document methods, produce replicable implementation steps, and communicate results in a way that others can adopt.
From an administrative and funding standpoint, the opportunity was tied to CFDA number 10.912, the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). NRCS anticipated making around six awards, with an estimated total funding pool of $350,000. Individual award amounts were expected to fall between $5,000 (award floor) and $75,000 (award ceiling). A cost-share or matching contribution was required, meaning applicants needed to bring non-federal resources to the table (cash and/or qualifying in-kind support, depending on the program’s rules), reinforcing the program’s goal of leveraging federal dollars.
The application process used a two-step state proposal approach with specific deadlines. Applicants first had to submit a pre-proposal by May 14, 2010. NRCS planned to notify applicants by May 28, 2010 if their idea was selected to move forward. Only those invited after the pre-proposal stage would prepare and submit a full proposal, due by July 1, 2010 (the original and current closing date). The opportunity was posted on April 27, 2010 and archived on September 30, 2010, reflecting a single funding cycle for that fiscal year.
Eligibility was broad and included many organization types and governmental entities. Eligible applicants included 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations (other than institutions of higher education), for-profit organizations (including small businesses and other for-profits), individuals, special district governments, city or township governments, county governments, state governments, independent school districts, federally recognized Native American tribal governments, and both private and public/state-controlled institutions of higher education. This wide eligibility suggests NRCS was open to strong conservation implementation proposals from a variety of sectors, as long as the project aligned with CIG’s intent: field-ready innovation, demonstrable conservation outcomes, and clear pathways for adoption beyond the project itself.
The funding opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number: CIG USDA NRCS UTAH FY10) was categorized under several activity areas, including Agriculture, Energy, Environment, Information and Statistics, Natural Resources, and Science and Technology/Research and Development, though the description makes clear that the relevant “science and technology” aspect was about deployment and transfer rather than hypothesis-driven research. For additional details, the announcement pointed to the USDA/NRCS Utah website. The listed contact for access issues or assistance was Pamela Harvey, Grants and Agreements Specialist, reachable by phone at 801-524-4580.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) Utah 2010
What is the Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) Utah 2010 opportunity?
The Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG) Utah 2010 was a discretionary grant opportunity offered by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Utah State Office. It was designed to speed up real-world adoption of innovative conservation practices and technologies that improve environmental outcomes while still supporting agricultural production.
What was the main purpose of this grant program?
The core goal was to move conservation solutions that are already shown to work into broader use. Successful projects were expected to be strong candidates for technology transfer, scaling, or eventual incorporation into NRCS policy and technical resources such as manuals, guides, and references, or adoption by the private sector.
Was this grant meant to fund research?
No. CIG Utah 2010 explicitly did not fund traditional research. Projects focused on creating or testing a new hypothesis, or exploring whether something might work, were not eligible under this opportunity.
If it did not fund research, what types of projects were eligible?
The program focused on application and demonstration of proven approaches, technologies, or management systems that had already been studied enough to show a strong likelihood of success. The emphasis was on field-ready, practical pilot projects and demonstrations that could produce measurable conservation results under real operating conditions.
What does "innovative on-the-ground conservation" mean in this opportunity?
It points to projects that are implemented in real settings (not just in theory), often through pilot projects or field demonstrations. Proposals were expected to show practical implementation steps and measurable outcomes that others could replicate and adopt.
How was "leveraging federal investment" reflected in the program?
Projects were expected to make NRCS dollars go further by pairing federal funding with partner expertise, additional funding, and/or on-the-ground capacity. A required cost-share or matching contribution reinforced this leverage expectation.
Was matching funding or cost-share required?
Yes. A cost-share or matching contribution was required, meaning applicants needed to bring non-federal resources to support the project. The announcement described this as cash and/or qualifying in-kind support, depending on program rules.
How much funding was available overall?
NRCS anticipated a total funding pool of about $350,000 for this Utah 2010 opportunity.
How many awards did NRCS expect to make?
NRCS anticipated making approximately six awards.
What was the expected award size range?
Individual awards were expected to range from $5,000 (the award floor) up to $75,000 (the award ceiling).
What was the CFDA number associated with this opportunity?
This opportunity was tied to CFDA number 10.912, the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP).
What was the Funding Opportunity Number for this grant?
The Funding Opportunity Number listed in the announcement was CIG USDA NRCS UTAH FY10.
Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was broad. Eligible applicants included: 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations (other than institutions of higher education), for-profit organizations (including small businesses and other for-profits), individuals, special district governments, city or township governments, county governments, state governments, independent school districts, federally recognized Native American tribal governments, and both private and public/state-controlled institutions of higher education.
Did the opportunity encourage collaboration?
Yes. The announcement highlighted the value of sharing skills, knowledge, technologies, and facilities across communities, governments, and institutions, which strongly favors collaborative projects that can document methods and communicate replicable results.
What were the key dates for the application process?
The opportunity was posted on April 27, 2010. Pre-proposals were due May 14, 2010. NRCS planned to notify applicants by May 28, 2010 if they were selected to submit a full proposal. Full proposals (by invitation) were due July 1, 2010, which was also the closing date listed. The opportunity was archived on September 30, 2010.
Was the application process single-step or multi-step?
It used a two-step state proposal process. Applicants first submitted a pre-proposal. Only those invited after the pre-proposal review were asked to submit a full proposal.
Could an applicant submit a full proposal without being invited?
No. Based on the stated two-step process, only applicants invited after the pre-proposal stage would prepare and submit a full proposal.
What activity areas did NRCS associate with this opportunity?
The opportunity was categorized under Agriculture, Energy, Environment, Information and Statistics, Natural Resources, and Science and Technology/Research and Development. However, the description clarified that the relevant emphasis was on deployment and transfer of proven conservation solutions rather than hypothesis-driven research.
Where could applicants look for additional details?
The announcement pointed applicants to the USDA/NRCS Utah website for additional details.
Who was the contact person for access issues or application assistance?
The listed contact was Pamela Harvey, Grants and Agreements Specialist. The phone number provided was 801-524-4580.
Was this opportunity part of an ongoing program cycle or a specific year?
It reflected a single funding cycle for that fiscal year. It was posted in April 2010, had deadlines in May and July 2010, and was archived on September 30, 2010.
What kind of outcomes were projects expected to demonstrate?
Projects were expected to demonstrate measurable conservation results in real operating conditions and show a clear pathway for broader adoption, such as replication by other users, uptake in the private sector, or potential incorporation into NRCS technical resources and policy guidance.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Agriculture Energy Environment Information and Statistics Natural Resources Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Small, Rural School Achievement Program CFDA Number 84.358A
Previous opportunity: Conservation Innovation Grant RI
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for CIG USDA NRCS UTAH FY10
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "CIG USDA NRCS UTAH FY10", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.