Opportunity Information: Apply for 10HQPA0078

  • The Geological Survey in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Colorado Plateau CESU" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.808 U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Jun 17, 2010 and posted on Jun 17, 2010.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Jun 28, 2010. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $35,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • This financial assistance opportunity is being issued under a Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program. CESU s are partnerships that provide research, technical assistance, and education. Eligible recipients must be a participating partner of the Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program.
Apply for 10HQPA0078

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

This grant opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number 10HQPA0078) was offered by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) through its Science Support Partnership (SSP) Program under the Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) framework, specifically the Colorado Plateau CESU. The award mechanism is a cooperative agreement, meaning the project is expected to involve substantial collaboration with the federal partner rather than functioning as a hands-off grant. It falls under CFDA 15.808 (USGS Research and Data Collection) and is categorized as Science and Technology and other Research and Development. The notice anticipated making one award, with an estimated total funding amount of $35,000. There was no cost sharing or matching requirement, and the opportunity was time-limited (posted June 17, 2010, with a closing date of June 28, 2010, and later archived July 28, 2010).

Eligibility was restricted to organizations that were already participating partners in the Colorado Plateau CESU Program. CESUs are formal partnerships that connect federal agencies with universities, tribes, and other research institutions to deliver research, technical assistance, and education aligned with public land and natural resource management needs. In practical terms, applicants needed to be part of that specific CESU network to be considered.

The scientific focus of the opportunity was native trout restoration, centered on testing the hypothesis of biotic resistance in the Logan River system. Biotic resistance, in this context, generally refers to the idea that native species and intact biological communities can limit or resist invasions by nonnative species, potentially influencing whether restoration actions succeed. USGS sought a partner to conduct a combined research program that links real-world field manipulation, controlled laboratory experimentation, and broad-scale synthesis to better understand how native and invasive fish interact and what restoration strategies might be most effective.

The project objectives were organized into three connected components. First, the core of the work was a large-scale, manipulative field study with three treatments. One treatment involved comprehensive removal of exotic (invasive) fish in an entire tributary, identified as Righthand Fork, where invasive fish were originally present at high density; following removal, native fish would be actively encouraged to reestablish. A second treatment (in a separate study area to be determined) involved a less comprehensive removal approach, where invasive fish densities would be reduced but not necessarily eliminated, and native reestablishment would occur more naturally. The third treatment served as a control or reference condition, where native and invasive fishes would remain at roughly similar densities and no manipulation would occur. A key feature of the field component was close monitoring of fluvial geomorphology before and after biological manipulation, so the study could evaluate whether physical habitat characteristics mediate or constrain biotic resistance. In other words, the work was designed not only to track fish responses to removals, but also to connect those responses to stream form and habitat processes that could help explain why invasives persist or why natives recover in some places and not others.

Second, the opportunity called for a set of smaller-scale, highly controlled laboratory experiments to complement and help interpret the field results. The description emphasizes experiments that vary the densities of native and invasive fishes within small enclosures while manipulating relevant physical drivers such as water velocity and temperature. This laboratory work is meant to isolate mechanisms that are difficult to separate in a natural stream, such as whether competitive effects depend on crowding, or whether temperature and flow conditions shift the balance in favor of natives versus invasives. Taken together, the lab component functions as a mechanistic testbed for the patterns observed in the field manipulations.

Third, the project was expected to scale up from the Logan River-focused mechanistic studies into a broader meta-analysis evaluating evidence for and against biotic resistance across a much larger geographic extent. The funding notice specifically references using NAWQA (National Water-Quality Assessment) data from approximately 1,000 streams across the United States. This synthesis element would allow the recipient to test whether relationships suggested by the Logan River work hold across diverse regions and stream types, strengthening the generality and management relevance of the findings.

For applicants or partners needing access assistance or administrative clarification at the time, the listed point of contact was Faith Graves, Contract Specialist (phone 703-648-7356).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the funding opportunity number for this grant?

The Funding Opportunity Number is 10HQPA0078.

2. Which federal agency offered this opportunity?

This opportunity was offered by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).

3. What program is this opportunity associated with?

It was offered through the USGS Science Support Partnership (SSP) Program under the Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) framework, specifically the Colorado Plateau CESU.

4. What type of award is this?

The award mechanism is a cooperative agreement. This means the project is expected to involve substantial collaboration with the federal partner, rather than operating as a hands-off grant.

5. What is the CFDA number and program classification?

The opportunity falls under CFDA 15.808 (USGS Research and Data Collection) and is categorized as Science and Technology and other Research and Development.

6. How many awards did USGS anticipate making?

The notice anticipated making one award.

7. What was the estimated total funding amount?

The estimated total funding amount was $35,000.

8. Was cost sharing or matching required?

No. There was no cost sharing or matching requirement.

9. When was the opportunity posted and when did it close?

It was posted on June 17, 2010, and had a closing date of June 28, 2010.

10. Is this opportunity still open?

No. The opportunity was time-limited and was later archived on July 28, 2010.

11. Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was restricted to organizations that were already participating partners in the Colorado Plateau CESU Program.

12. What is a CESU in the context of this opportunity?

CESUs are formal partnerships that connect federal agencies with universities, tribes, and other research institutions to deliver research, technical assistance, and education aligned with public land and natural resource management needs.

13. What was the main scientific focus of the project?

The scientific focus was native trout restoration, centered on testing the hypothesis of biotic resistance in the Logan River system.

14. What does "biotic resistance" mean in this project description?

Biotic resistance generally refers to the idea that native species and intact biological communities can limit or resist invasions by nonnative species, potentially influencing whether restoration actions succeed.

15. What overall approach did USGS seek from the partner?

USGS sought a combined research program linking real-world field manipulation, controlled laboratory experimentation, and broad-scale synthesis to better understand interactions between native and invasive fish and to inform restoration strategies.

16. What were the three main components of the project objectives?

The objectives were organized into: (1) a large-scale manipulative field study, (2) smaller-scale controlled laboratory experiments, and (3) a broader meta-analysis using NAWQA data from approximately 1,000 U.S. streams.

17. What did the field study involve?

The field component was a large-scale manipulative study with three treatments designed to compare outcomes under different invasive fish removal and restoration conditions.

18. What was the first field treatment?

The first treatment involved comprehensive removal of exotic (invasive) fish in an entire tributary identified as Righthand Fork, where invasive fish were originally present at high density. After removal, native fish would be actively encouraged to reestablish.

19. What was the second field treatment?

The second treatment (in a separate study area to be determined) involved a less comprehensive removal approach. Invasive fish densities would be reduced but not necessarily eliminated, and native reestablishment would occur more naturally.

20. What was the third field treatment (control/reference condition)?

The third treatment served as a control or reference condition where native and invasive fishes would remain at roughly similar densities and no manipulation would occur.

21. Why did the field work include monitoring of fluvial geomorphology?

A key feature was close monitoring of fluvial geomorphology before and after biological manipulation to evaluate whether physical habitat characteristics mediate or constrain biotic resistance. The study was designed to connect fish responses to stream form and habitat processes that could influence invasive persistence or native recovery.

22. What was the purpose of the laboratory experiments?

The laboratory experiments were intended to complement and help interpret the field results by isolating mechanisms that are difficult to separate in natural streams.

23. What kinds of variables were expected to be manipulated in the lab experiments?

The description emphasizes varying the densities of native and invasive fishes within small enclosures while manipulating physical drivers such as water velocity and temperature.

24. What questions were the lab experiments meant to help answer?

They were meant to test mechanisms such as whether competitive effects depend on crowding and whether temperature and flow conditions shift the balance in favor of natives versus invasives.

25. What was the synthesis/meta-analysis component expected to do?

The project was expected to scale up from Logan River mechanistic studies into a broader meta-analysis evaluating evidence for and against biotic resistance across a much larger geographic extent.

26. What dataset was referenced for the meta-analysis?

The notice references using NAWQA (National Water-Quality Assessment) data from approximately 1,000 streams across the United States.

27. How did USGS describe the value of including a national-scale analysis?

This synthesis element would allow testing whether relationships suggested by the Logan River work hold across diverse regions and stream types, strengthening the generality and management relevance of the findings.

28. Who was the point of contact for access assistance or administrative clarification?

The listed point of contact was Faith Graves, Contract Specialist, at 703-648-7356.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Geological Survey

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development

Next opportunity: Informed Decision Making in Young Adolescents at Risk for HIV/AIDS (R01)

Previous opportunity: ACA Expansion of Physician Assistant Training Program

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for 10HQPA0078

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (10HQPA0078) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
ROSES 2010 Moon and Mars Analog Missions Activities Apply for NNH10ZDA001N MMAMA

Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N MMAMA
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Emergency Egress Window for Locomotives Apply for FR RRD 10 016

Funding Number: FR RRD 10 016
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $90,000
DoD Spinal Cord Injury Translational Research Partnership Award Apply for W81XWH 10 SCIRP TRPA

Funding Number: W81XWH 10 SCIRP TRPA
Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
DoD Spinal Cord Injury Qualitative Research Award Apply for W81XWH 10 SCIRP QRA

Funding Number: W81XWH 10 SCIRP QRA
Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Hybrid Road Locomotive for Emissions Reduction Apply for FR RRD 10 015

Funding Number: FR RRD 10 015
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $400,000
DoD Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial Award Rehabilitation Apply for W81XWH 10 SCIRP CTA R

Funding Number: W81XWH 10 SCIRP CTA R
Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
DoD Spinal Cord Injury Investigator Initiated Research Award Apply for W81XWH 10 SCIRP IIRA

Funding Number: W81XWH 10 SCIRP IIRA
Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Californian CESU Apply for 11HQPA0003

Funding Number: 11HQPA0003
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Californian CESU Apply for 10HQPA0082

Funding Number: 10HQPA0082
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Gulf Coast CESU Apply for 10HQPA0083

Funding Number: 10HQPA0083
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
DRAFT EXPLORER 2010 ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY Apply for NNH10ZDA008J

Funding Number: NNH10ZDA008J
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
DRAFT EXPLORER 2010 MISSIONS OF OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM ELEMENT APPENDIX PEA Apply for NNH10ZDA009J

Funding Number: NNH10ZDA009J
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Control of Material Properties through Advanced StructureS (COMPASS) Apply for DARPA BAA 10 73

Funding Number: DARPA BAA 10 73
Agency: DARPA Defense Sciences Office
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Frontiers in Earth System Dynamics Apply for 10 577

Funding Number: 10 577
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
EarthScope Apply for 10 576

Funding Number: 10 576
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
DoD Peer Reviewed Orthopaedic Career Development Award Apply for W81XWH 10 PRORP CDA

Funding Number: W81XWH 10 PRORP CDA
Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
FY 2010 Railroad Research and Development Safety Evaluation of HSR Bogie Concepts Apply for FR RRD 10 017

Funding Number: FR RRD 10 017
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $300,000
Technical Assistance fo rthe Development of an EIR Analysis of the Klamath Agreements for the Secretarial Determination Process Apply for FWS R8 YREKA SECDET 17

Funding Number: FWS R8 YREKA SECDET 17
Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $25,000
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for 10HQPA0090

Funding Number: 10HQPA0090
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for 10HQPA0088

Funding Number: 10HQPA0088
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "10HQPA0078", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.