Opportunity Information: Apply for 10HQPA0092
Apply for 10HQPA0092
- The Geological Survey in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Rivers CESU" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.808 U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection.
- This funding opportunity was created on Jul 7, 2010 and posted on Jul 7, 2010.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 19, 2010. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $29,375.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- This financial assistance opportunity is being issued under a Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program. CESU s are partnerships that provide research, technical assistance, and education. Eligible recipients must be a participating partner of the Great Rivers Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
This grant opportunity, titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Rivers CESU" (Funding Opportunity Number 10HQPA0092), is a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) request for a single Cooperative Agreement project aimed at improving how laboratories culture and run toxicity tests with the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. The work is intended to follow and build on established procedures described in USEPA (2000) and ASTM (2009) methods, but with a clear focus on resolving practical and scientific issues that still cause inconsistent performance across labs. In plain terms, the project is about tightening up the recipe and the playbook for keeping Hyalella healthy in the lab and for producing toxicity-test results that regulators and risk assessors can trust.
The scientific motivation is that Hyalella azteca is one of the most commonly used organisms for evaluating chemical toxicity in both water-only tests and sediment tests, largely because it is sensitive to contaminants, practical to rear, and relevant to freshwater ecosystems. Even so, different laboratories sometimes get different levels of survival, growth, or reproduction under what are supposed to be standard test conditions. Those inconsistencies matter because toxicity results are often used in ecological risk assessments, water quality criteria development, and other regulatory decisions. The announcement points to a concrete example: USEPA draft ammonia criteria work reportedly did not include certain Hyalella toxicity data in the core dataset due to concerns that some studies may have used test conditions that were not appropriate, including worries that water chemistry, especially chloride, could be affecting organism performance. That kind of exclusion can reduce the usefulness of Hyalella data in policy and regulatory contexts, so the grant is essentially trying to shore up confidence in the methods and the resulting data.
A major theme of the work is water quality and the choice of test water. Standard sediment-toxicity methods have cautioned against using some forms of reconstituted water as the overlying water because Hyalella performance has been inconsistent in those waters. At the same time, the announcement notes that some labs do fine with reconstituted "Smith water" (Smith et al. 1997), while others report better performance with alternatives such as "Borgmann water" (Borgmann 1996) or with natural waters (or modified natural waters). The opportunity is therefore centered on figuring out why the same nominal method can yield different outcomes depending on the lab, and how to adjust culture and test practices so performance becomes more consistent and predictable. The discussion suggests several possible drivers: differences in water chemistry (including chloride and other ions), food and substrate differences during culture or exposure, differences in acclimation history (how long and under what conditions organisms have been maintained), and genetic strain differences among Hyalella stocks used by different laboratories. The project is meant to refine and clarify methods so that laboratories can reliably meet standard method expectations for acceptable survival, growth, and reproduction in the chosen exposure water, which is a key quality control requirement under USEPA and ASTM guidance.
In terms of program mechanics, this is a discretionary research funding opportunity under the CESU framework, specifically the Great Rivers Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. CESUs are partnership networks that allow federal agencies to work with participating institutions on research, technical assistance, and education, and eligibility is limited to organizations that are already partners in the Great Rivers CESU. The agency anticipates making one award, with an estimated total funding level of $29,375. The funding instrument is a Cooperative Agreement, which generally implies substantial federal involvement or collaboration during the project rather than a hands-off grant. There is no cost sharing or matching requirement stated.
Key administrative details include: the opportunity was posted July 7, 2010, with an original and current closing date of July 19, 2010, and it was archived August 18, 2010. The CFDA number listed is 15.808 (U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection). Although the notice does not specify an award ceiling or floor (both are shown as 0), the estimated total funding provides the best indicator of the project scale. For access or submission questions tied to the full announcement, the contact listed is Faith Graves, Contract Specialist, at 703-648-7356.
Overall, the opportunity is best understood as a targeted methods-improvement project: it is not simply asking for more Hyalella toxicity data, but for research that identifies and resolves the controllable factors that make Hyalella culture and toxicity testing succeed in some labs and fail in others. The intended outcome is more reliable, standardized, and defensible Hyalella-based toxicity protocols, which would strengthen the credibility and regulatory usability of toxicity results generated with this widely used freshwater test organism.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the title and funding opportunity number for this grant?
The opportunity is titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Rivers CESU" and the Funding Opportunity Number is 10HQPA0092.
Which federal agency is offering this opportunity?
This is a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) funding opportunity.
What type of award is USGS planning to make?
USGS is requesting a single project under a Cooperative Agreement. A Cooperative Agreement typically indicates substantial federal involvement or collaboration during the project.
How many awards does the agency expect to make?
The agency anticipates making one award.
What is the estimated total funding amount?
The estimated total funding level is $29,375.
Is there an award ceiling or award floor?
The notice shows an award ceiling of 0 and an award floor of 0. The estimated total funding amount ($29,375) is the best indicator of the intended project scale based on the information provided.
Is cost sharing or matching required?
No cost sharing or matching requirement is stated in the opportunity description.
What is the CFDA number for this program?
The CFDA number listed is 15.808 (U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection).
What is the main purpose of this project?
The project is a targeted methods-improvement effort focused on improving how laboratories culture and run toxicity tests with the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. The goal is to resolve practical and scientific issues that cause inconsistent performance across labs and to improve confidence in the resulting toxicity-test data.
Is this opportunity intended to generate new toxicity datasets, or to improve methods?
Based on the description, the emphasis is on improving and refining culture and toxicity testing methods so results are more consistent and defensible, rather than simply producing additional Hyalella toxicity data.
Which organism is the focus of the work, and why is it important?
The work centers on the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. It is commonly used to evaluate chemical toxicity in water-only tests and sediment tests because it is sensitive to contaminants, practical to rear, and relevant to freshwater ecosystems.
Why does inconsistency among laboratories matter for Hyalella testing?
Differences among labs in survival, growth, or reproduction under supposedly standard conditions can reduce confidence in toxicity results. Since these results can be used in ecological risk assessments, water quality criteria development, and regulatory decisions, inconsistent performance can make data less usable or even excluded from key datasets.
What example does the announcement give for how inconsistent test conditions can affect regulatory use of data?
The notice mentions that USEPA draft ammonia criteria work reportedly did not include certain Hyalella toxicity data in the core dataset due to concerns about potentially inappropriate test conditions, including concerns that water chemistry (especially chloride) could be affecting organism performance.
What established methods or guidance is this project expected to follow and build on?
The work is intended to follow and build on established procedures described in USEPA (2000) and ASTM (2009) methods, while focusing on resolving remaining issues that lead to inconsistent performance across laboratories.
What is the central technical theme highlighted in the announcement?
A major theme is water quality and the selection of test water. The opportunity is centered on understanding why the same nominal methods yield different outcomes depending on the lab, and how to adjust practices so Hyalella performance becomes more consistent and predictable.
Why is test water selection a concern in Hyalella sediment-toxicity testing?
Standard sediment-toxicity methods have cautioned against using some forms of reconstituted water as overlying water because Hyalella performance has been inconsistent in those waters. The opportunity aims to address these inconsistencies.
Which specific test waters are mentioned as being used by different laboratories?
The announcement notes that some labs perform well using reconstituted "Smith water" (Smith et al. 1997), while others report better performance with alternatives such as "Borgmann water" (Borgmann 1996) or with natural waters (or modified natural waters).
What possible causes of inter-laboratory variability are identified?
The description suggests several potential drivers, including differences in water chemistry (including chloride and other ions), differences in food and substrate used during culture or exposure, differences in acclimation history (how long and under what conditions organisms have been maintained), and genetic strain differences among Hyalella stocks used by different laboratories.
What outcomes is the project trying to achieve for laboratory performance?
The project aims to refine and clarify methods so laboratories can reliably meet standard expectations for acceptable survival, growth, and reproduction in the chosen exposure water. This is described as a key quality control requirement under USEPA and ASTM guidance.
What is a CESU, and which CESU applies here?
CESUs (Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Units) are partnership networks that allow federal agencies to work with participating institutions on research, technical assistance, and education. This opportunity is under the Great Rivers Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (Great Rivers CESU).
Who is eligible to apply?
Eligibility is limited to organizations that are already partners in the Great Rivers CESU.
When was the opportunity posted, and what were the closing dates?
The opportunity was posted on July 7, 2010. The original closing date and the current closing date are both July 19, 2010.
What does it mean that the opportunity is archived?
The notice states it was archived on August 18, 2010.
Who is the point of contact for access or submission questions?
The contact listed is Faith Graves, Contract Specialist, at 703-648-7356.
In plain terms, what is USGS trying to improve through this project?
The project is about tightening up the recipe and the playbook for keeping Hyalella healthy in the lab and producing toxicity-test results that regulators and risk assessors can trust, by identifying and resolving controllable factors that lead to lab-to-lab differences.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU
Previous opportunity: Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Colorado Plateau
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for 10HQPA0092
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (10HQPA0092) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for 10HQPA0095 Funding Number: 10HQPA0095 Agency: Geological Survey Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| PROgramming Computation on EncryptEd Data Apply for DARPA RA 10 80 Funding Number: DARPA RA 10 80 Agency: DARPA Transformational Convergence Technology Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| NASA ASTROBIOLOGY INSTITUTE MINORITY INSTITUTION RESEARCH SUPPORT MIRS PROGRAM Apply for NNA10339208C Funding Number: NNA10339208C Agency: NASA Ames Research Center Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| National Spherical Torus Experiment Collaborative Research on Configuration Optimization Apply for DE FOA 0000396 Funding Number: DE FOA 0000396 Agency: Chicago Service Center Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $350,000 |
| Klamath Tribes Technical Assistance for the Development of an EIS Analysis of the Klamath Agreements for the Secretarial Determination Process Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 18 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 18 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Educational Poster Map of the Klamath Basin Settlement Process Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 20 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 20 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Research Networks in the Mathematical Sciences Apply for 10 584 Funding Number: 10 584 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $5,000,000 |
| Centers for Chemical Innovation Apply for 10 585 Funding Number: 10 585 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| JPC1 MedSim Combat Casualty Training Consortium Apply for W81XWH 10 JPC MEDSIM CCTC Funding Number: W81XWH 10 JPC MEDSIM CCTC Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Offices of Fuel Cell Technologies and Biomass FY2010 Energy and Water Appropriations Act, Research, Development and Demonstration Projects Apply for DE FOA 0000380 Funding Number: DE FOA 0000380 Agency: Golden Field Office Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| First Responder Coping Mechanisms for PTSD Project Apply for BAA10 18 Funding Number: BAA10 18 Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $440,000 |
| Shoe Scanner Detection Technology (SSD) Apply for BAA10 17 Funding Number: BAA10 17 Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $2,000,000 |
| DOD Peer Reviewed Cancer Concept Award Apply for W81XWH 10 PRCRP CA Funding Number: W81XWH 10 PRCRP CA Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Escapement Enumeration Mainstem Klamath Carcass Survey Apply for FWS R8 YFWO FISHERIES FP 04 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO FISHERIES FP 04 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $30,791 |
| Cooperative Research on Computational Aeronautical Sciences Apply for BAA 10 07 PKV Funding Number: BAA 10 07 PKV Agency: Air Force Research Lab Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Screening of Palletized Air Cargo Emerging Technologies Apply for BAA10 19 Funding Number: BAA10 19 Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $3,000,000 |
| Research and Evaluation on Education in Science and Engineering Apply for 10 586 Funding Number: 10 586 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Fall run Chinook Model Enhancement and Completion of Model Development Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $75,714 |
| 2010 K 12 Summer of Innovation (SoI) Capacity Building Apply for NNG10ZNE009C Funding Number: NNG10ZNE009C Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Karuk Tribe Technical Assistance for the Development of an EIS Analysis of the Klamath Agreements for the Secretarial Determination Process Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 19 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 19 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "10HQPA0092", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
