Opportunity Information: Apply for G14AS00100

  • The Geological Survey in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.808 U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Jul 21, 2014 and posted on Jun 26, 2014.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Aug 1, 2014. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $20,501.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • This financial assistance opportunity is being issued under a Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program. CESUs are partnerships that provide research, technical assistance, and education. Eligible recipients must be a participating partner of the Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) Program.
Apply for G14AS00100

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

This funding opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number G14AS00100), titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU," was issued by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), specifically through the Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK). It is a discretionary science and technology research award made as a cooperative agreement, meaning the USGS is likely to have substantial involvement during the project (for example, coordination on study design, data use, or interpretation). The core purpose is to strengthen long-term ecological monitoring on federal lands so land managers and scientists can better measure current resource condition (often described as "status") and detect whether conditions are improving or declining over time, particularly in relation to management actions and climate change.

The focus of the work is statistical and methodological rather than field implementation alone. USGS is looking for rigorous guidance on how to design monitoring programs (sampling design development) and how to analyze the resulting data to estimate status and trends in ways that are defensible and statistically sound. In practical terms, this can include recommending how to choose sampling locations, how frequently to revisit sites, how to handle incomplete or uneven sampling across years, and how to quantify uncertainty so that reported trends are credible for decision-making. Because long-term monitoring programs often operate under real-world constraints (limited budgets, changing priorities, inconsistent access, and varying methods over time), the opportunity emphasizes approaches that remain robust even when ideal assumptions do not hold.

A major element mentioned in the announcement is the possible use of simulation studies. Simulations are a way to test how well different sampling and analysis choices perform under controlled, hypothetical scenarios that mimic real ecological monitoring challenges. The announcement highlights several specific issues that simulations might explore. One is the effect of sampling design misspecification on ratio estimators. Ratio estimators are commonly used when an outcome is expressed relative to some measure of exposure or size (for example, prevalence, density relative to area, or condition relative to a baseline). If the sampling design assumed by the analysis does not match the design actually used in the field, estimates can become biased or have misleading confidence intervals. Another issue is detection bias and how it affects ratio estimators, with an example tied to estimating blister rust prevalence in whitebark pine. Detection bias occurs when the probability of observing a condition (like disease symptoms) varies by observer, site conditions, season, tree characteristics, or survey method. If not addressed, this can make disease prevalence appear to change over time even when the true underlying prevalence is stable, or it can mask real changes. The opportunity also points to sample size calculations under different sampling designs for ecological indicators, which essentially means determining how many plots, trees, reaches, or other sampling units are needed to reliably detect meaningful changes, and how those requirements shift depending on design choices (for example, simple random sampling versus stratified designs, rotating panels, clustered designs, or spatially balanced sampling).

Beyond design and estimator performance, the announcement notes interest in trend modeling for complex survey data, especially the kind of data produced when programs collaborate across geographic boundaries. That is an important point because many federal and interagency monitoring efforts try to integrate datasets collected by different offices or partners, sometimes using different protocols, different spatial footprints, and different sampling intensities. Modeling trends in that context can require methods that account for survey weights, stratification, clustering, spatial correlation, changing sampling frames over time, and differences in detectability or measurement processes. The underlying goal is to support integration and comparability so that broader-scale assessments (across parks, forests, regions, or multi-jurisdiction landscapes) can still produce coherent trend estimates and uncertainty measures.

Administratively, the opportunity anticipated a single award, with an estimated total funding amount of $20,501. The listing shows no cost sharing or matching requirement, which generally reduces barriers to participation for eligible partners. The award ceiling and floor are both listed as $0, a common artifact in some postings that typically means the precise award amount is determined by the available funds and the negotiated scope rather than a fixed range published in the announcement.

Eligibility is limited to partners in the Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) network. CESUs are formal partnerships that connect federal agencies with universities, tribes, non-profits, and other organizations to deliver research, technical assistance, and education. For this specific opportunity, applicants must be participating members of the Rocky Mountain CESU Program, so an organization outside the CESU would generally need to partner with an eligible CESU member rather than applying directly.

Key dates in the record indicate the opportunity was posted June 26, 2014, created in the system July 21, 2014, and ultimately had a current closing date of August 1, 2014, with an archive date of September 26, 2014. The associated CFDA number is 15.808 (U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection), which aligns with the research-focused nature of the work. For applicants or interested parties who needed help accessing the full announcement through Grants.gov, the contact listed was Faith Graves at USGS (phone 703-648-7356, email fgraves@usgs.gov).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the name and funding opportunity number for this grant?

The opportunity is titled "Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU" and the Funding Opportunity Number is G14AS00100.

Which agency is offering this funding?

This opportunity was issued by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), through the Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK).

What type of award is this?

This is a discretionary science and technology research award made as a cooperative agreement.

What does it mean that the award is a cooperative agreement?

A cooperative agreement indicates that USGS is likely to have substantial involvement during the project. Examples mentioned include coordination on study design, data use, or interpretation.

What is the main purpose of the project?

The core purpose is to strengthen long-term ecological monitoring on federal lands so land managers and scientists can better measure current resource condition (status) and detect whether conditions are improving or declining over time, particularly in relation to management actions and climate change.

Is the work mainly field-based monitoring, or is it more methodological?

The focus is statistical and methodological rather than field implementation alone. USGS is seeking rigorous guidance on monitoring design and analysis approaches that produce defensible estimates of status and trends.

What kinds of monitoring-program design questions are within scope?

Examples described include how to choose sampling locations, how often to revisit sites, how to handle incomplete or uneven sampling across years, and how to quantify uncertainty so that reported trends are credible for decision-making.

Why does the opportunity emphasize robustness to real-world constraints?

Long-term monitoring programs often face limited budgets, changing priorities, inconsistent access, and methods that vary over time. The opportunity emphasizes approaches that remain statistically sound even when ideal assumptions do not hold.

Are simulation studies specifically encouraged?

Yes. The announcement highlights simulation studies as a possible way to test how different sampling and analysis choices perform under scenarios that mimic real ecological monitoring challenges.

What specific technical issues might simulations explore?

The announcement points to several examples, including: (1) the effect of sampling design misspecification on ratio estimators, (2) detection bias and how it affects ratio estimators (with an example related to blister rust prevalence in whitebark pine), and (3) sample size calculations under different sampling designs for ecological indicators.

What are ratio estimators in the context of this opportunity?

Ratio estimators are described as being used when an outcome is expressed relative to some measure of exposure or size (for example, prevalence, density relative to area, or condition relative to a baseline).

Why is sampling design misspecification a concern for ratio estimators?

If the sampling design assumed by the analysis does not match the design actually used in the field, estimates can become biased or produce misleading confidence intervals.

What is detection bias, and why does it matter for monitoring trends?

Detection bias occurs when the probability of observing a condition varies due to factors such as observer differences, site conditions, season, tree characteristics, or survey method. If not addressed, it can make conditions appear to change over time when true conditions are stable, or it can hide real changes.

Does the opportunity mention any specific ecological example related to detection bias?

Yes. The announcement gives an example tied to estimating blister rust prevalence in whitebark pine.

What does the opportunity say about sample size calculations?

It notes interest in determining how many sampling units (such as plots, trees, reaches, or other units) are needed to reliably detect meaningful changes, and how those requirements change under different sampling designs.

Which sampling designs are explicitly mentioned as examples?

The opportunity lists examples such as simple random sampling, stratified designs, rotating panels, clustered designs, and spatially balanced sampling.

Is trend modeling part of the scope?

Yes. The announcement notes interest in trend modeling for complex survey data, especially data produced when monitoring programs collaborate across geographic boundaries.

What makes the trend-modeling problem "complex" in this announcement?

The opportunity describes complexities that can arise when integrating data across partners and areas, including survey weights, stratification, clustering, spatial correlation, changing sampling frames over time, and differences in detectability or measurement processes.

Why is multi-partner or cross-boundary integration emphasized?

The goal is to support integration and comparability so broader-scale assessments (across parks, forests, regions, or multi-jurisdiction landscapes) can still produce coherent trend estimates and uncertainty measures.

How many awards were anticipated?

The opportunity anticipated a single award.

What was the estimated total funding amount?

The estimated total funding amount listed is $20,501.

Is cost sharing or matching required?

No. The listing shows no cost sharing or matching requirement.

Why do the award ceiling and floor both show $0?

The posting notes this can be an artifact in some listings, typically indicating the precise award amount is determined by available funds and the negotiated scope rather than a fixed published range.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is limited to partners in the Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU) network. Applicants must be participating members of the Rocky Mountain CESU Program.

Can an organization outside the Rocky Mountain CESU apply directly?

Generally, no. The information provided indicates an organization outside the CESU would typically need to partner with an eligible CESU member rather than applying directly.

What is the CFDA number associated with this opportunity?

The CFDA number listed is 15.808 (U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection).

When was the opportunity posted and when did it close?

The record indicates it was posted on June 26, 2014. The current closing date listed is August 1, 2014.

When was the opportunity archived?

The archive date listed is September 26, 2014.

Who can be contacted for help accessing the full announcement on Grants.gov?

The contact listed is Faith Graves at USGS (phone 703-648-7356, email fgraves@usgs.gov).

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Geological Survey

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development

Next opportunity: Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Pacific Northwest CESU

Previous opportunity: Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Chesapeake Watershed CESU

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for G14AS00100

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (G14AS00100) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Pacific Northwest CESU Apply for G14AS00099

Funding Number: G14AS00099
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Lakes Northern Forest CESU Apply for G14AS00106

Funding Number: G14AS00106
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, South Florida/Caribbean CESU Apply for G14AS00107

Funding Number: G14AS00107
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for G14AS00108

Funding Number: G14AS00108
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecoystem Studies Unit, Great Lakes Northern Forest CESU Apply for G14AS00109

Funding Number: G14AS00109
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Rivers CESU Apply for G14AS00110

Funding Number: G14AS00110
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for G14AS00101

Funding Number: G14AS00101
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Desert Southwest CESU Apply for G14AS00121

Funding Number: G14AS00121
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Plains CESU Apply for G14AS00122

Funding Number: G14AS00122
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Colorado Plateau CESU Apply for G14AS00120

Funding Number: G14AS00120
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, North Atlantic Coast CESU Apply for G14AS00119

Funding Number: G14AS00119
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
National Vegetation Plot Data Harvest Apply for G14AS00118

Funding Number: G14AS00118
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for G14AS00116

Funding Number: G14AS00116
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Desert Southwest CESU Apply for G14AS00111

Funding Number: G14AS00111
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for G14AS00105

Funding Number: G14AS00105
Agency: Geological Survey
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Endangered Species Candidate Conservation Apply for F14AS00267

Funding Number: F14AS00267
Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $150,000
DHS ST Critical Infrastructure Resilience Center of Excellence (CIRC) Center Lead Apply for DHS 14 ST 061 COE CIRC 001A

Funding Number: DHS 14 ST 061 COE CIRC 001A
Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $4,000,000
DHS ST Critical Infrastructure Resilience Center of Excellence (CIRC) Center Partner Apply for DHS 14 ST 061 COE CIRC 001B

Funding Number: DHS 14 ST 061 COE CIRC 001B
Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $500,000
Hyper wideband Enabled RF Messaging (HERMES) Apply for DARPA BAA 14 34

Funding Number: DARPA BAA 14 34
Agency: DARPA Microsystems Technology Office
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
FY 2014 Cooperating Technical Partner Apply for DHS 14 MT 045 000 01

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 045 000 01
Agency: Department of Homeland Security FEMA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "G14AS00100", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.