Opportunity Information: Apply for DARPA BAA 12 17
Apply for DARPA BAA 12 17
- The DARPA Information Innovation Office in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Crowd Sourced Formal Verification (CSFV)" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 12.910 Research and Technology Development.
- This funding opportunity was created on Dec 21, 2011 and posted on Dec 21, 2011.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Mar 20, 2012. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Crowd Sourced Formal Verification (CSFV) opportunity was a DARPA Information Innovation Office (I2O) research solicitation focused on advancing science and technology related to formal methods, specifically formal verification, by exploring how large-scale participation and “crowd†dynamics could be used to make rigorous verification faster, cheaper, and more scalable. The basic idea behind the title is that formal verification is traditionally done by small teams of highly specialized experts using mathematically grounded tools and proofs, which can be slow and difficult to scale to the kinds of complex software and hardware systems the government cares about. DARPA’s intent with a program like CSFV would be to investigate whether verification work can be decomposed into smaller tasks, distributed to many contributors, and recombined in a way that still preserves the strong correctness guarantees that formal methods promise.
From an administrative standpoint, this was a discretionary funding opportunity under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The Funding Opportunity Number was DARPA BAA 12-17, and the title was “Crowd Sourced Formal Verification (CSFV).†The activity category was science and technology and other research and development, and the CFDA number listed was 12.910 (Research and Technology Development). The posted and creation date were both December 21, 2011. The original and current closing date were March 20, 2012, and the archive date was April 19, 2012, which indicates this was a time-bounded solicitation that is no longer accepting proposals.
In terms of award mechanisms, DARPA indicated multiple possible instruments: cooperative agreements, other transactions (OTs), and procurement contracts. That mix matters because it signals flexibility in how DARPA planned to structure research engagements. Cooperative agreements typically involve substantial government involvement in the technical direction and collaboration. Other transactions are often used for more agile, prototype-oriented R&D efforts with terms that can differ from standard federal acquisition rules. Procurement contracts are used when the government is acquiring R&D deliverables under the FAR. The presence of all three suggests DARPA was open to funding a range of performers and project styles, from more exploratory academic-style research to prototype demonstrations and capability development.
Eligibility was described as unrestricted, meaning proposals could come from essentially any type of entity, subject to any clarifications that might have been included in the full announcement text. In practical terms, that usually includes universities, nonprofit research institutes, small businesses, large defense contractors, and consortia or teams combining multiple organization types. The listing also explicitly stated there was no cost sharing or matching requirement, so proposers were not required to contribute their own funds as a condition of receiving an award, which generally lowers the barrier to entry for smaller organizations and academic groups.
The public-facing description in the summary states “See attachment,†and the additional information link points to a posting on FedBizOpps, which was the platform used at the time for many federal procurement and broad agency announcement postings. Because the technical details were contained in the attached announcement rather than in the summary fields, the key takeaways available from the listing itself are the program’s topic area (crowd-sourced approaches to formal verification), the administering office (DARPA I2O), the solicitation and timeline identifiers, the allowed award instruments, and the open eligibility posture. The contact listed for access issues or coordination was Drew Dean, Program Manager at DARPA/I2O, along with a reference to a BAA Coordinator role, which is typical for DARPA BAAs where proposers may need help obtaining the full announcement or navigating submission logistics.
At a high level, a program framed as “crowd sourced formal verification†implies research challenges such as how to break formal verification into modular sub-problems; how to specify tasks so non-expert or semi-expert contributors can participate meaningfully; how to manage quality control and trust (for example, detecting incorrect proofs, adversarial submissions, or low-quality work); how to aggregate partial proofs, invariants, counterexamples, or lemmas into a coherent end-to-end verification result; and how to design incentive structures, workflows, and tooling that make distributed contributions productive. It also implies an interest in human-computer collaboration: tools that guide contributors, automatically check submissions, and route tasks to the right skill level, while keeping the overall process mathematically sound. Even without the attachment text, the title and DARPA I2O context strongly suggest the emphasis was on creating new methods, platforms, and prototype demonstrations that show measurable improvements in verification throughput, scalability, or applicability to real systems of interest.
If you share the attachment text (or paste the main technical area and deliverables sections), a much tighter summary can be produced that covers the program goals, technical areas, metrics, expected deliverables, and any specific performer requirements exactly as DARPA stated them.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): DARPA Crowd Sourced Formal Verification (CSFV) - BAA 12-17
What is the Crowd Sourced Formal Verification (CSFV) opportunity?
CSFV was a DARPA Information Innovation Office (I2O) research solicitation focused on advancing formal methods, specifically formal verification, by exploring whether large-scale participation ("crowd" dynamics) could make rigorous verification faster, cheaper, and more scalable.
Who ran this program?
The opportunity was administered by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Information Innovation Office (I2O).
What is the Funding Opportunity Number and official title?
The Funding Opportunity Number was DARPA BAA 12-17, and the title was "Crowd Sourced Formal Verification (CSFV)."
What type of funding opportunity was this?
This was a DARPA research solicitation (a Broad Agency Announcement style opportunity) categorized as a discretionary funding opportunity.
What was the activity category for this solicitation?
The activity category was science and technology and other research and development.
What CFDA number was associated with this opportunity?
The listing included CFDA 12.910 (Research and Technology Development).
When was the opportunity posted?
The posted date and the creation date were both December 21, 2011.
When did proposals close?
The original closing date and the current closing date were March 20, 2012.
Is this solicitation still open?
No. The archive date was April 19, 2012, which indicates it was time-bounded and is no longer accepting proposals.
What award instruments were available under this opportunity?
DARPA indicated multiple possible award mechanisms: cooperative agreements, other transactions (OTs), and procurement contracts.
Why does it matter that DARPA listed cooperative agreements, OTs, and contracts?
The mix of instruments suggests DARPA planned flexibility in structuring research engagements, potentially supporting different types of performers and project styles (for example, collaborative research arrangements, agile prototype-oriented R&D, and more traditional FAR-based R&D acquisitions).
Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was described as unrestricted, meaning proposals could come from essentially any type of entity, subject to any clarifications that would have been included in the full announcement.
What kinds of organizations would "unrestricted eligibility" typically include?
Based on the listing description, unrestricted eligibility would generally include universities, nonprofit research institutes, small businesses, large defense contractors, and teams or consortia combining multiple organization types.
Was cost sharing or matching required?
No. The listing explicitly stated there was no cost sharing or matching requirement.
Where were the technical details of the solicitation provided?
The public-facing summary field stated "See attachment," meaning the detailed technical scope, requirements, and submission instructions were contained in an attached announcement rather than fully described in the summary fields.
Where was the opportunity posted publicly?
An additional information link pointed to a posting on FedBizOpps, which was the federal platform used at the time for many procurement and broad agency announcement postings.
What was the main research idea behind "crowd sourced" formal verification?
The core idea was to investigate whether formal verification work (traditionally handled by small teams of highly specialized experts) could be decomposed into smaller tasks, distributed to many contributors, and recombined while preserving strong correctness guarantees.
Why was DARPA interested in crowd approaches for formal verification?
The listing frames formal verification as mathematically rigorous but often slow and hard to scale for complex software and hardware systems. A crowd-sourced approach was positioned as a way to potentially improve speed, cost, and scalability.
What kinds of technical challenges are implied by a CSFV-style program?
Based on the title and description provided, the implied challenges include: breaking verification into modular sub-problems; specifying tasks so non-expert or semi-expert contributors can participate; ensuring quality control and trust (including detecting incorrect or adversarial submissions); aggregating partial results (proofs, lemmas, invariants, counterexamples) into an end-to-end verification outcome; and designing workflows, incentives, and tooling to keep the overall process mathematically sound.
Does the description suggest an emphasis on tooling and automation?
Yes. The description implies human-computer collaboration, including tools that guide contributors, automatically check submissions, and route tasks to appropriate skill levels while preserving verification rigor.
What kinds of outcomes would DARPA likely have been looking for (based on the summary provided)?
Even without the attachment, the description suggests interest in new methods, platforms, and prototype demonstrations that could show measurable improvements in verification throughput, scalability, or applicability to real systems of interest.
Who was the listed point of contact?
The contact listed was Drew Dean, Program Manager at DARPA/I2O, with reference to a BAA Coordinator role (commonly used for access issues or submission logistics).
Can we rely on the summary fields alone for complete requirements?
No. The listing indicates the key technical details were in the attachment, so the summary fields mainly provide topic area, office, identifiers, dates, instruments, eligibility posture, and contact information rather than the full statement of work and submission requirements.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: Jail as Part of County Government Review and Revision
Previous opportunity: Operate Environmental Education Center and Volunteer Program at CUVA
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for DARPA BAA 12 17
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (DARPA BAA 12 17) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| NIST Summer Institute for Middle School Science Teachers (NIST Summer Institute) Program Apply for 2012 NIST SUMMER INSTITUTE 01 Funding Number: 2012 NIST SUMMER INSTITUTE 01 Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| NIST Research Experience for Teachers (NIST RET) Program Apply for 2012 NIST RET 01 Funding Number: 2012 NIST RET 01 Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction using Earth System Models Apply for 12 522 Funding Number: 12 522 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $5,000,000 |
| Climate Change Education (CCE) Climate Change Education Partnership (CCEP) Program, Phase II Apply for 12 523 Funding Number: 12 523 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $6,250,000 |
| Long Term Ecological Research Apply for 12 524 Funding Number: 12 524 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Apply for 12 525 Funding Number: 12 525 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $3,250,000 |
| Planning a Partnership Model for a Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope Apply for 12 526 Funding Number: 12 526 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Piedmont South Atlantic Coast CESU Apply for G12AS20010 Funding Number: G12AS20010 Agency: Geological Survey Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Image Optimization for Small Focal Plane Arrays Apply for ONRBAA12 005 Funding Number: ONRBAA12 005 Agency: Office of Naval Research Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2011 Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Apply for NNH11ZDA001N OSTST Funding Number: NNH11ZDA001N OSTST Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2011 Astrophysics Research and Analysis Apply for NNH11ZDA001N APRA Funding Number: NNH11ZDA001N APRA Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2011 Strategic Astrophysics Technology Apply for NNH11ZDA001N SAT Funding Number: NNH11ZDA001N SAT Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| GROUND BASED STUDIES IN SPACE RADIOBIOLOGY Apply for NNJ12ZSA001N Funding Number: NNJ12ZSA001N Agency: NASA Johnson Space Center Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $450,000 |
| COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NOTICE DUAL USE TECHNOLOGY AT STENNIS SPACE CENTER Apply for NNS12417298R Funding Number: NNS12417298R Agency: NASA Stennis Space Center Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $75,000 |
| Predictive Time Associated Geo location of Mobile Targets using Unmanned Aircraft Systems Apply for USAFA BAA 2009 1 CALL 0004 Funding Number: USAFA BAA 2009 1 CALL 0004 Agency: Air Force Academy Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $275,000 |
| FY 12 FUNDING OPPORTUNITY FOR THE NATIONAL CONSORTIUM FOR MEASUREMENT AND SIGNATURE INTELLIGENCE (MASINT) RESEARCH PROGRAM Apply for NPS BAA 12 001 Funding Number: NPS BAA 12 001 Agency: Naval Supply Systems Command Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| University Center of Excellence for Integrated Computational Material Science and Engineering of Structural Materials Apply for BAA AFOSR 2012 03 Funding Number: BAA AFOSR 2012 03 Agency: Air Force Office of Scientific Research Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $3,000,000 |
| Computing Education for the 21st Century Apply for 12 527 Funding Number: 12 527 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $10,000,000 |
| Dimensions of Biodiversity Apply for 12 528 Funding Number: 12 528 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $2,000,000 |
| Strategic Technologies Apply for DARPA BAA 12 09 Funding Number: DARPA BAA 12 09 Agency: DARPA Strategic Technology Office Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "DARPA BAA 12 17", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
