Opportunity Information: Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 002 99
Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 002 99
- The Region 2 in the other (see text field entitled explanation of other category of funding activity for clarification) sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 2" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 97.023 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE).
- This funding opportunity was created on May 8, 2014 and posted on May 8, 2014.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 1, 2014. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $10,400,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 52 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- Only those State agencies that the State has designated by statute or Governor s declaration as a National Flood Insurance Program State Coordinating Agency as described in 44 C.F.R. 60.25 are eligible to apply.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The FY 2014 Community Assistance Program - State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) for FEMA Region 2 is a discretionary cooperative agreement opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number DHS 14 MT 023 002 99; CFDA 97.023) designed to strengthen how National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requirements are carried out at the local level. The core purpose is twofold: to fund State-delivered technical assistance to participating NFIP communities and to support evaluations of how well communities are implementing NFIP floodplain management standards. FEMA’s underlying goal is flood loss reduction, and the program is structured around practical, on-the-ground support paired with performance oversight.
For FY 2014, FEMA made it clear that the program emphasis is compliance and enforcement. While activities like map adoption support, disaster-related assistance, and training continue to matter, FEMA framed credible compliance and enforcement as essential to achieving measurable reductions in flood damage over time. FEMA Regional Offices are expected to set the level of effort for each activity and ensure performance metrics are met, with some requirements being mandatory and other tasks encouraged as optional enhancements depending on State capacity and regional priorities.
A central required component is the State’s completion of Community Assistance Visits (CAVs) and Community Assistance Contacts (CACs). States must use a risk-based approach to decide which communities receive these visits and contacts, following the NFIP guidance for conducting CAVs and CACs and using the CAV Tier 1 Prioritization Tool. Tier 1 prioritization is required for CAV selection, although Regions and States can choose Tier 2 communities in limited cases if they document justification in the Community Information System (CIS). FEMA also encourages States to make strong use of CACs and other routine touchpoints to spot potential compliance issues early and direct technical assistance where it is most needed. An important operational requirement is that all CAVs and CACs must be entered into CIS so FEMA can track and monitor this work. States are also expected to provide follow-up assistance after CAVs and CACs to correct deficiencies and remedy violations as much as possible, and to elevate unresolved compliance problems to the FEMA Regional Office.
Another major priority area is ordinance assistance, particularly tied to flood map updates. States are expected to help communities review and revise floodplain management ordinances so they remain compliant with NFIP minimum standards and incorporate new FEMA hazard data before updated Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) become effective. FEMA requires cooperative agreements to include a map adoption performance measure, specifically tracking the percentage of participating communities that adopt an ordinance referencing the updated map by the FIRM effective date. A key required benchmark is a mandatory map adoption rate of 93 percent or higher, making this one of the clearest numeric performance expectations in the announcement.
The opportunity also outlines several optional but strongly encouraged planning and program-improvement tools. Strategic planning is presented as an optional task that can help States assess the maturity and effectiveness of their floodplain management programs, prepare for future workload, find efficiencies, and identify ways to expand services. FEMA and the Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) developed a strategic planning guidance document for this purpose. States may also choose to perform an annual CAP Gap Analysis using FEMA’s CAP GAP tool. FEMA notes that GAP analysis results have supported budget justifications for program funding, and States that want to refine or update their analysis may submit revised results to the Region for consideration in future years. FEMA also points out that GAP analysis can support and inform strategic planning.
States are encouraged to keep their State model floodplain management ordinances up to date and to monitor the broader State regulatory environment affecting floodplain management. This includes aligning local regulatory approaches with NFIP minimum requirements in 44 CFR 60.3 and, where possible, promoting higher regulatory standards. A specific focus is coordination with State building code systems, since many States adopt codes based on International Code Council (I-Codes) or National Fire Protection Association models. Because these codes often contain NFIP-consistent provisions unless modified, FEMA expects States to understand how code adoption and enforcement affects local floodplain regulation and to help communities navigate how building codes and floodplain ordinances interact in practice. FEMA also signals support resources such as a model companion ordinance intended to coordinate with I-Code-based building codes, and it notes that FEMA Headquarters’ Building Science Branch can provide training on flood provisions of the International Codes at Regional CAP conferences if requested.
Training and outreach is another major eligible activity area. States are encouraged to deliver workshops and other training for local officials and key partners who influence floodplain outcomes, including insurance agents, lenders, adjusters, realtors, land surveyors, and design professionals. The intent is to reinforce consistent implementation and enforcement of floodplain regulations, improve hazard identification and risk communication, and strengthen NFIP insurance knowledge and planning coordination. Training schedules and locations are expected to be coordinated with the FEMA Region to avoid duplication and to align with regional strategies. Within training support, FEMA encourages professional credentialing through ASFPM’s Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) program. CAP SSSE funds may cover the initial CFM exam and biennial renewal fees for State floodplain staff involved in floodplain management work, and States are encouraged to sponsor and proctor CFM exams in coordination with ASFPM. However, the funding cannot reimburse individual ASFPM membership fees. Travel support may also be allowable for State floodplain personnel to attend the ASFPM National Conference, FEMA Regional CAP SSSE coordination meetings, and in-State Silver Jackets coordination meetings, with other related meetings potentially eligible if pre-approved by the Region. In some cases and at regional discretion, limited funding may be negotiated to help local officials attend or assist with an ASFPM conference held within their State.
Beyond visits, ordinances, and training, the eligible activity list includes general technical assistance to communities and individuals on NFIP-related floodplain management issues, assistance with enrolling communities into the NFIP (helping them meet minimum eligibility requirements), and support for the Community Rating System (CRS). CRS support can include helping communities pursue CRS entry, providing general technical assistance, conducting entry CAVs, and supporting activities that receive CRS credit. The program also includes mapping coordination assistance tied to FEMA’s Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP initiatives, where States work with Regions to set mapping priorities and participate in community meetings connected to the mapping process. FEMA highlights an important boundary here: CAP SSSE and Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) Program Management funds must be planned separately but coordinated carefully, and neither funding source can be used to conduct floodplain studies or to develop floodplain maps. Some overlapping support activities, such as map adoption, training, and outreach, may be allowable under both programs, but FEMA stresses the need for coordination to prevent duplication of effort.
FEMA also encourages States to coordinate CAP SSSE work with other State programs and agencies that affect floodplain management, including Hazard Mitigation Assistance programs (such as the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre-Disaster Mitigation, and Flood Mitigation Assistance), as well as dam safety, land use, building code authorities, water resources programs, transportation agencies, port authorities, and other entities active in floodplains. Coordination around State executive orders and regulations that support NFIP requirements is also encouraged, reflecting FEMA’s interest in aligning the broader State policy environment with local NFIP implementation.
Disaster-related assistance is addressed as a flexible, situational set of activities. States are encouraged to help NFIP communities after disasters, for example by assisting with substantial damage determinations (including use of FEMA’s Substantial Damage Estimating Software), providing NFIP technical assistance during recovery, promoting and supporting Increased Cost of Compliance coverage, and connecting communities to hazard mitigation assistance options. FEMA notes these activities are generally not part of the standard annual CAP SSSE agreement but can be negotiated when disasters occur, with the agreement modified accordingly.
Finally, FEMA calls out a specific compliance issue that should receive extra scrutiny during CAVs: mechanical, electrical, and utility equipment located below the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), as well as flood openings that do not meet the requirements at 44 CFR 60.3(c)(5). FEMA cites NFIP evaluation findings indicating these two problem types made up about half of observed violations in the sampled assessments, so States are encouraged to treat them as focal points for improved enforcement and corrective technical assistance.
From an administrative standpoint, this opportunity was posted May 8, 2014, with an application closing date of July 1, 2014, and an archive date of July 31, 2014. The estimated total funding was $10.4 million, with 52 expected awards. Award floor and ceiling are listed as $0, reflecting that award sizing is determined through FEMA-State negotiation rather than a single fixed grant amount. Cost sharing or matching is required. Eligibility is limited to the State agency designated by statute or the Governor’s declaration as the NFIP State Coordinating Agency under 44 CFR 60.25. For Region 2, the listed program contact was Kim Rizzo (FEMA Region 2 Mitigation Division CAP SSSE Coordinator), with contact information provided in the announcement.
FAQs: FY 2014 Community Assistance Program - State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE), FEMA Region 2
1) What is the FY 2014 CAP SSSE (FEMA Region 2) funding opportunity?
It is a discretionary cooperative agreement opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number DHS 14 MT 023 002 99; CFDA 97.023) intended to strengthen how National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requirements are carried out at the local level by funding State-delivered technical assistance and evaluating community implementation of NFIP floodplain management standards.
2) What is the main purpose of CAP SSSE?
The program has a two-part purpose: (1) fund State-delivered technical assistance to participating NFIP communities, and (2) support evaluations of how well communities implement NFIP floodplain management standards. FEMA frames the underlying goal as flood loss reduction.
3) What was FEMA emphasizing for FY 2014?
For FY 2014, FEMA emphasized compliance and enforcement. FEMA stated that credible compliance and enforcement are essential to achieving measurable reductions in flood damage over time, even while other activities (like map adoption support, disaster-related assistance, and training) remain important.
4) Who decides the level of effort for different activities?
FEMA Regional Offices are expected to set the level of effort for each activity and ensure performance metrics are met. Some requirements are mandatory, and other activities are encouraged as optional enhancements based on State capacity and regional priorities.
5) Who is eligible to apply?
Eligibility is limited to the State agency designated by statute or the Governor's declaration as the NFIP State Coordinating Agency under 44 CFR 60.25.
6) Is cost sharing or matching required?
Yes. The opportunity states that cost sharing or matching is required.
7) How much funding was available, and how many awards were expected?
The estimated total funding was $10.4 million, with 52 expected awards.
8) What were the award floor and ceiling?
The award floor and ceiling were both listed as $0. This reflects that award amounts are determined through FEMA-State negotiation rather than a fixed grant size.
9) What were the key dates for this opportunity?
The opportunity was posted May 8, 2014. The application closing date was July 1, 2014. The archive date was July 31, 2014.
10) What are Community Assistance Visits (CAVs) and Community Assistance Contacts (CACs), and are they required?
CAVs and CACs are central required components. States must complete CAVs and CACs as part of the cooperative agreement and use them to evaluate community NFIP implementation and provide technical assistance.
11) How must States select communities for CAVs?
States must use a risk-based approach and follow NFIP guidance for conducting CAVs and CACs. Tier 1 prioritization is required for CAV selection using the CAV Tier 1 Prioritization Tool.
12) Can Tier 2 communities be selected for CAVs?
Yes, but only in limited cases and with documentation. Regions and States may choose Tier 2 communities if they document justification in the Community Information System (CIS).
13) Are States encouraged to use CACs even beyond formal visits?
Yes. FEMA encourages strong use of CACs and other routine touchpoints to identify potential compliance issues early and direct technical assistance where it is most needed.
14) What system must be used to record CAVs and CACs?
All CAVs and CACs must be entered into the Community Information System (CIS) so FEMA can track and monitor the work.
15) What follow-up is expected after CAVs and CACs?
States are expected to provide follow-up assistance to correct deficiencies and remedy violations as much as possible, and to elevate unresolved compliance problems to the FEMA Regional Office.
16) What is ordinance assistance, and why is it a priority?
Ordinance assistance is a major priority, especially tied to flood map updates. States are expected to help communities review and revise floodplain management ordinances to remain compliant with NFIP minimum standards and incorporate new FEMA hazard data before updated Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) become effective.
17) Is there a required performance measure related to map adoption?
Yes. Cooperative agreements must include a map adoption performance measure tracking the percentage of participating communities that adopt an ordinance referencing the updated map by the FIRM effective date.
18) What is the required map adoption benchmark?
The announcement specifies a mandatory map adoption rate of 93 percent or higher.
19) Are strategic planning and CAP Gap Analysis required?
No. Strategic planning is presented as an optional task, and an annual CAP Gap Analysis using FEMA's CAP GAP tool is also optional. Both are described as useful planning and program-improvement tools.
20) What resources are mentioned for strategic planning?
FEMA and the Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) developed a strategic planning guidance document for States to assess program maturity and effectiveness, prepare for future workload, find efficiencies, and identify ways to expand services.
21) How can CAP GAP analysis results be used?
FEMA notes that GAP analysis results have supported budget justifications for program funding. States that refine or update their analysis may submit revised results to the Region for consideration in future years. FEMA also notes GAP analysis can support and inform strategic planning.
22) What is the expectation around State model floodplain management ordinances?
States are encouraged to keep State model floodplain management ordinances up to date and to monitor the broader State regulatory environment affecting floodplain management, including alignment with NFIP minimum requirements in 44 CFR 60.3 and, where possible, promoting higher regulatory standards.
23) Why does FEMA highlight coordination with State building codes?
FEMA expects States to understand how building code adoption and enforcement affects local floodplain regulation and to help communities navigate how building codes and floodplain ordinances interact in practice. Many States use building codes based on International Code Council (I-Codes) or National Fire Protection Association models, which can contain NFIP-consistent provisions unless modified.
24) What support resources are mentioned for building code and ordinance coordination?
FEMA references a model companion ordinance intended to coordinate with I-Code-based building codes. FEMA also notes that FEMA Headquarters' Building Science Branch can provide training on flood provisions of the International Codes at Regional CAP conferences if requested.
25) What types of training and outreach are encouraged under CAP SSSE?
States are encouraged to deliver workshops and training for local officials and key partners who influence floodplain outcomes, including insurance agents, lenders, adjusters, realtors, land surveyors, and design professionals. The intent is to support consistent implementation and enforcement, improve hazard identification and risk communication, and strengthen NFIP insurance knowledge and planning coordination.
26) Does FEMA require coordination of training schedules?
Yes. Training schedules and locations are expected to be coordinated with the FEMA Region to avoid duplication and align with regional strategies.
27) Can CAP SSSE funds support ASFPM Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) credentialing?
Yes. CAP SSSE funds may cover the initial CFM exam and biennial renewal fees for State floodplain staff involved in floodplain management work. States are encouraged to sponsor and proctor CFM exams in coordination with ASFPM.
28) Are ASFPM membership fees allowable under this funding?
No. The announcement states the funding cannot reimburse individual ASFPM membership fees.
29) What travel may be allowable under CAP SSSE?
Travel support may be allowable for State floodplain personnel to attend the ASFPM National Conference, FEMA Regional CAP SSSE coordination meetings, and in-State Silver Jackets coordination meetings. Other related meetings may be eligible if pre-approved by the Region.
30) Can local officials receive support to attend ASFPM conferences?
In some cases and at regional discretion, limited funding may be negotiated to help local officials attend or assist with an ASFPM conference held within their State.
31) What kinds of general technical assistance are eligible?
Eligible activities include providing technical assistance to communities and individuals on NFIP-related floodplain management issues.
32) Can CAP SSSE help communities join the NFIP?
Yes. The eligible activity list includes assistance with enrolling communities into the NFIP by helping them meet minimum eligibility requirements.
33) Does CAP SSSE support the Community Rating System (CRS)?
Yes. CRS support can include helping communities pursue CRS entry, providing general CRS technical assistance, conducting entry CAVs, and supporting activities that receive CRS credit.
34) What mapping-related work is included, and what is not allowed?
States may provide mapping coordination assistance tied to FEMA's Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP initiatives, such as working with Regions to set mapping priorities and participating in community meetings connected to the mapping process. However, CAP SSSE (and CTP Program Management funds) cannot be used to conduct floodplain studies or to develop floodplain maps.
35) How does CAP SSSE relate to the Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) program?
CAP SSSE and CTP Program Management funds must be planned separately but coordinated carefully. Some overlapping support activities (like map adoption, training, and outreach) may be allowable under both, but coordination is required to prevent duplication of effort.
36) What other State programs and agencies should CAP SSSE coordinate with?
FEMA encourages coordination with other State programs and agencies affecting floodplain management, including Hazard Mitigation Assistance programs (Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, Pre-Disaster Mitigation, Flood Mitigation Assistance), dam safety, land use, building code authorities, water resources programs, transportation agencies, port authorities, and other entities active in floodplains. Coordination around State executive orders and regulations that support NFIP requirements is also encouraged.
37) Are disaster-related activities part of the standard CAP SSSE agreement?
Generally, no. FEMA describes disaster-related assistance as flexible and situational, typically not part of the standard annual CAP SSSE agreement. These activities can be negotiated when disasters occur, and the agreement may be modified accordingly.
38) What are examples of disaster-related assistance that may be negotiated?
Examples include assisting with substantial damage determinations (including use of FEMA's Substantial Damage Estimating Software), providing NFIP technical assistance during recovery, promoting and supporting Increased Cost of Compliance coverage, and connecting communities to hazard mitigation assistance options.
39) What specific compliance issues does FEMA want emphasized during CAVs?
FEMA highlights extra scrutiny for (1) mechanical, electrical, and utility equipment located below the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), and (2) flood openings that do not meet the requirements at 44 CFR 60.3(c)(5). FEMA cites evaluation findings that these two issues made up about half of observed violations in sampled assessments.
40) Who was the listed FEMA Region 2 contact for this opportunity?
The announcement lists Kim Rizzo (FEMA Region 2 Mitigation Division CAP SSSE Coordinator) as the program contact, with contact information provided in the funding notice.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Next opportunity: Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 10
Previous opportunity: FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 1
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 002 99
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (DHS 14 MT 023 002 99) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 10 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 010 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 010 99 Agency: Region 10 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 3 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 003 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 003 99 Agency: Region 3 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 4 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 004 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 004 99 Agency: Region 4 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 9 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 009 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 009 99 Agency: Region 9 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 8 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 008 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 008 99 Agency: Region 8 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 5 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 005 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 005 99 Agency: Region 5 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 7 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 007 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 007 99 Agency: Region 7 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 6 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 006 99 Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 006 99 Agency: Region 6 Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Schuylkill River Greenway National Heritage Area Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0057 Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0057 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $30,000 |
| 2014 Strategic Planning for the Champlain Heritage Partnership Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0059 Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0059 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $296,500 |
| New Jersey Pinelands Long term Environmental and Economic Monitoring Program under Cooperative Agreement P13AC00554 between the New Jersey Pinelands Commission and the NPS. Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0086 Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0086 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $284,100 |
| Capt. John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail and Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0093 Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0093 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $492,701 |
| Place Based Education Partnership, at March Billings Rockefeller National Historical Park in Woodstock, VT Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0094 Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0094 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $58,050 |
| The Town of Provincetown Race Point/MacMillan Pier Bicycle Connection Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0099 Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0099 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $119,600 |
| IMRO Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant Program Apply for NPS IMRO JACS2015 Funding Number: NPS IMRO JACS2015 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| U.S. Mission to the European Union Funding Opportunity Apply for SBE300 15 CA 001 EUR 060315 Funding Number: SBE300 15 CA 001 EUR 060315 Agency: Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $60,000 |
| Connecting Yakutat Youth and Elders to Wrangell St. Elias National Park and Preserve Apply for NPS NOIP15AC000430 Funding Number: NPS NOIP15AC000430 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $15,000 |
| Civilian Conservation Corps Era Dry Stone Wall Restoration Training Apply for NPS 2015GRTE0015 Funding Number: NPS 2015GRTE0015 Agency: National Park Service Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $250,000 |
| CONFLICT MITIGATION AND RECONCILIATION PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WITH POSSIBLE MULTIPLE AWARDS Apply for USAID M OAA DCHA DOFDA 08 319 APS Funding Number: USAID M OAA DCHA DOFDA 08 319 APS Agency: Agency for International Development Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $35,000,000 |
| Request for Egypt Proposals Apply for DRL 09 EGYPT PROP 051309 Funding Number: DRL 09 EGYPT PROP 051309 Agency: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification) Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "DHS 14 MT 023 002 99", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
