Opportunity Information: Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 003 99

  • The Region 3 in the other (see text field entitled explanation of other category of funding activity for clarification) sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 3" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 97.023 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE).
  • This funding opportunity was created on May 8, 2014 and posted on May 8, 2014.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 1, 2014. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $10,400,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 52 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • Only those State agencies that the State has designated by statute or Governor s declaration as a National Flood Insurance Program State Coordinating Agency as described in 44 C.F.R. 60.25 are eligible to apply.
Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 003 99

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

The FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) for FEMA Region 3 is a discretionary cooperative agreement program (CFDA 97.023) that provides funding to designated State NFIP Coordinating Agencies to strengthen how communities participate in and carry out the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The core purpose is twofold: first, to deliver hands-on technical assistance that helps local governments understand and apply NFIP floodplain management requirements, and second, to evaluate and improve community performance in administering those requirements so flood risk and flood losses are reduced over time. In FY 2014, FEMA emphasized that the program should lean harder into compliance and enforcement, meaning the work is not only about education and support, but also about verifying that communities are actually implementing their ordinances correctly and fixing problems when violations or deficiencies are found.

A major required activity under this opportunity is conducting Community Assistance Visits (CAVs) and Community Assistance Contacts (CACs). States must carry out both types of interactions and are expected to use FEMA's risk-based prioritization approach, including the CAV Tier 1 Prioritization Tool, to focus limited staff time on the communities most likely to have significant flood risk, repeated issues, or the greatest need for oversight. While Tier 1 selection is required, Tier 2 communities can be chosen by exception as long as the State and Region document the justification in FEMA's Community Information System (CIS). The program also expects States to treat CACs as a high-value tool for early problem detection, troubleshooting, and targeted technical assistance, rather than relying only on formal visits. Just as important as the visit or contact itself is the follow-up: States are expected to help communities correct program weaknesses, address violations as far as possible, coordinate with FEMA on what corrective actions are needed, and elevate unresolved compliance problems to the FEMA Regional Office. FEMA requires that all CAVs and CACs be entered into CIS so FEMA can track performance and outcomes.

Another high-priority area is ordinance and map adoption assistance. FEMA highlights that communities must have compliant floodplain management ordinances in place, including updates tied to new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and any changes in NFIP minimum criteria. The cooperative agreement must include a performance measure tied to map adoption, and States are required to commit to a mandatory map adoption rate of 93 percent or higher. Practically, that means States are expected to push ordinance review and updates early enough that communities can adopt ordinances referencing updated FIRMs by the maps effective dates, reducing the risk that communities fall out of compliance or face NFIP sanctions due to delayed adoption.

Beyond the required items, the grant outlines several optional but strongly encouraged planning and program-improvement activities. Strategic planning is presented as an optional task that helps States evaluate the current condition of their floodplain management program, anticipate future workload, improve efficiency, and identify opportunities to expand services. FEMA and the Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) developed guidance to support that work. States may also choose to complete an annual CAP Gap Analysis using FEMA's CAP GAP tool; this analysis is framed as useful both for strategic planning and for producing data that can support future budget and staffing justifications. These planning tools are meant to help States document where capacity is strong, where communities struggle most, and what investments would make the biggest difference.

The opportunity also encourages States to keep their State model ordinances current and to monitor the broader State regulatory environment, especially where building codes intersect with floodplain management. Many States rely on statewide building codes based on model codes (such as the International Codes), and FEMA stresses that States and communities need to understand how those codes are enforced and how they interact with NFIP requirements. The program encourages coordination between the State NFIP Coordinator and State building code authorities, particularly around code interpretations that can affect flood compliance. FEMA notes that a model companion ordinance intended to align with I-Code-based building codes will be provided to the Regions, and FEMA Headquarters expertise (including the Building Science Branch) may be used for training support at Regional CAP conferences.

Training and outreach are another central component. States are encouraged to provide workshops and outreach for local officials and a broad set of stakeholders who influence floodplain outcomes, including insurance agents, lenders, adjusters, realtors, surveyors, and design professionals. The emphasis is on supporting real-world implementation and enforcement of local floodplain regulations, improving hazard identification and risk understanding, and strengthening NFIP-related knowledge in the field. The program also explicitly supports professional development through ASFPM, encouraging State staff to obtain and maintain Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) credentials. CAP SSSE funds may cover CFM exam and renewal fees for State employees involved in floodplain management, and States are encouraged to sponsor and proctor CFM exams. However, the funding cannot be used to reimburse individual ASFPM membership dues. Travel costs for State floodplain staff to attend the ASFPM National Conference, FEMA CAP coordination meetings, and State Silver Jackets meetings may be reimbursed, and other relevant meetings may be allowable with advance Regional approval. In some cases, and with Regional discretion and negotiation, limited funding may also support local officials participation in an ASFPM annual conference held within their State.

Several additional support functions are included as eligible activities, reflecting the day-to-day reality of State NFIP coordination. States may provide general technical assistance to communities and individuals on NFIP floodplain management questions, help non-participating communities enroll in the NFIP by guiding them through minimum eligibility steps, and support communities that want to join or improve within the Community Rating System (CRS). CRS-related support can include technical assistance, entry CAVs, and help with activities that earn CRS credit, which can lower flood insurance premiums for residents when communities adopt stronger practices.

The grant also expects coordination with FEMA mapping efforts, specifically Flood Map Modernization and the Risk MAP initiative. States must work with FEMA Regions to set mapping priorities and participate in community meetings tied to mapping. FEMA makes a clear boundary around the use of funds: CAP SSSE and Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) Program Management funding must be planned separately but coordinated to avoid duplication, and neither program's funds can be used to conduct floodplain studies or to develop flood maps. Even so, certain activities overlap and can be supported through either program, such as map adoption support, training, and outreach, so States are expected to coordinate closely to ensure resources are complementary.

Coordination is also encouraged across other State programs and agencies that affect floodplains and mitigation outcomes. FEMA points specifically to Hazard Mitigation Assistance programs (including HMGP, PDM, and FMA), and also to State dam safety, land use, building code, and water resources programs, plus agencies that regularly operate in floodplains like transportation departments or port authorities. The intent is to align floodplain management enforcement and technical assistance with the broader ecosystem of mitigation planning, infrastructure decisions, and State-level regulatory actions, including executive orders and regulations tied to NFIP responsibilities.

While disaster-related work is not typically baked into the annual CAP SSSE agreement, the opportunity anticipates that States may need to provide post-disaster support to NFIP communities. Examples include assistance with substantial damage determinations and use of FEMA tools like Substantial Damage Estimating Software, promoting and advising on Increased Cost of Compliance coverage, and helping communities connect to mitigation funding opportunities. If a disaster occurs, these tasks can be negotiated and added, but the cooperative agreement must be formally modified to reflect the changes.

For FY 2014, FEMA also calls out specific compliance problem areas that deserve extra attention during CAVs: mechanical, electrical, and utility equipment installed below the Base Flood Elevation, and flood openings that do not meet the requirements in 44 CFR 60.3(c)(5). FEMA cites NFIP evaluation findings showing these issues made up about half of observed violations in the quantitative compliance assessment, so reviewers are expected to look closely at these details when checking permits, inspections, and as-built outcomes. Finally, FEMA notes that Regional Offices may sometimes conduct a CAV of the State floodplain management program itself, and may request the State's help with coordination, information gathering, and preparation.

Administratively, this opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number DHS-14-MT-023-003-99) was posted May 8, 2014, with an application deadline of July 1, 2014, and an estimated total funding amount of $10.4 million across an expected 52 awards. There is a cost share or matching requirement, and eligible applicants are limited to State agencies formally designated by statute or the Governor as the NFIP State Coordinating Agency under 44 CFR 60.25. The Region 3 contact listed for access issues and coordination is Kathryn Lipiecki in the FEMA Region 3 Mitigation Division (215-931-5655, Kathryn.Lipiecki@fema.dhs.gov).

FAQs: FY 2014 CAP SSSE (FEMA Region 3) - DHS-14-MT-023-003-99

What is this grant opportunity?

The FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) for FEMA Region 3 is a discretionary cooperative agreement program (CFDA 97.023) that funds designated State NFIP Coordinating Agencies to strengthen how communities participate in and carry out the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

What is the main purpose of CAP SSSE funding?

The purpose is twofold: (1) provide hands-on technical assistance so local governments understand and apply NFIP floodplain management requirements, and (2) evaluate and improve community performance administering those requirements to reduce flood risk and flood losses over time.

What did FEMA emphasize for FY 2014?

FEMA emphasized stronger compliance and enforcement in FY 2014. The work is not only education and support, but also verifying that communities are implementing their floodplain ordinances correctly and fixing problems when violations or deficiencies are identified.

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants are limited to State agencies that are formally designated by statute or the Governor as the NFIP State Coordinating Agency under 44 CFR 60.25.

Is this a discretionary program or a formula program?

It is described as a discretionary cooperative agreement program.

What is the CFDA number for this opportunity?

The CFDA number provided is 97.023.

What is the Funding Opportunity Number?

The Funding Opportunity Number is DHS-14-MT-023-003-99.

When was the opportunity posted and when was the application due?

It was posted May 8, 2014, and the application deadline was July 1, 2014.

How much total funding was estimated to be available?

The estimated total funding amount was $10.4 million.

How many awards were expected?

The opportunity anticipated approximately 52 awards.

Is there a cost share or match requirement?

Yes. The opportunity states there is a cost share or matching requirement.

What required activities must States carry out under this agreement?

A major required activity is conducting both Community Assistance Visits (CAVs) and Community Assistance Contacts (CACs), using FEMA's risk-based prioritization approach. States are also expected to support ordinance and map adoption assistance, including meeting a mandatory map adoption rate.

What are Community Assistance Visits (CAVs)?

CAVs are formal interactions where the State reviews and evaluates a community's implementation of NFIP floodplain management requirements and works with the community on correcting weaknesses, addressing violations, and improving administration and enforcement.

What are Community Assistance Contacts (CACs)?

CACs are interactions used as a high-value tool for early problem detection, troubleshooting, and targeted technical assistance. The program encourages using CACs proactively rather than relying only on formal CAVs.

How are States expected to choose which communities get CAVs or CACs?

States are expected to use FEMA's risk-based prioritization approach, including the CAV Tier 1 Prioritization Tool, to focus staff time on communities with significant flood risk, repeated issues, or the greatest oversight needs.

Is Tier 1 prioritization required?

Yes. Tier 1 selection is required under FEMA's prioritization approach.

Can Tier 2 communities be selected?

Yes, Tier 2 communities may be selected by exception as long as the State and FEMA Region document the justification in FEMA's Community Information System (CIS).

What follow-up is expected after a CAV or CAC?

Follow-up is a key expectation. States are expected to help communities correct program weaknesses, address violations as far as possible, coordinate with FEMA on corrective actions, and elevate unresolved compliance problems to the FEMA Regional Office.

Do CAVs and CACs have to be reported to FEMA?

Yes. FEMA requires that all CAVs and CACs be entered into CIS so FEMA can track performance and outcomes.

What is CIS in this context?

CIS refers to FEMA's Community Information System, where States must enter records of CAVs and CACs and where Tier 2 exception justifications are documented.

What is the map and ordinance adoption assistance requirement?

The program prioritizes ensuring communities have compliant floodplain management ordinances, including updates tied to new Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and changes in NFIP minimum criteria. The cooperative agreement must include a performance measure tied to map adoption.

What map adoption rate must States commit to?

States are required to commit to a mandatory map adoption rate of 93 percent or higher.

Why does FEMA focus on early ordinance review and adoption?

Because communities need to adopt ordinances referencing updated FIRMs by the maps' effective dates. Early action reduces the risk communities fall out of compliance or face NFIP sanctions due to delayed adoption.

Are strategic planning activities allowed under the grant?

Yes. Strategic planning is described as optional but strongly encouraged to help States evaluate program condition, anticipate workload, improve efficiency, and identify opportunities to expand services. FEMA and ASFPM guidance is referenced as support for this work.

Is a CAP Gap Analysis allowed or encouraged?

Yes. States may choose to complete an annual CAP Gap Analysis using FEMA's CAP GAP tool. It is framed as useful for strategic planning and for generating data that can support future budget and staffing justifications.

Does the grant encourage updating State model ordinances?

Yes. The opportunity encourages States to keep State model ordinances current and to monitor the broader State regulatory environment, especially where building codes intersect with floodplain management.

How does FEMA expect States to handle building codes and floodplain management overlaps?

FEMA stresses that States and communities should understand how statewide building codes (often based on model codes such as the International Codes) are enforced and how they interact with NFIP requirements. Coordination between the State NFIP Coordinator and State building code authorities is encouraged, particularly around code interpretations that affect flood compliance.

Is any FEMA training support mentioned related to building codes?

Yes. FEMA notes that a model companion ordinance intended to align with I-Code-based building codes will be provided to Regions, and FEMA Headquarters expertise (including the Building Science Branch) may support training at Regional CAP conferences.

What kinds of training and outreach does the program encourage?

States are encouraged to provide workshops and outreach for local officials and stakeholders who influence floodplain outcomes, including insurance agents, lenders, adjusters, realtors, surveyors, and design professionals. The emphasis is on improving real-world implementation and enforcement, hazard identification, risk understanding, and NFIP knowledge.

Can CAP SSSE funds support Certified Floodplain Manager (CFM) credentials?

Yes. CAP SSSE funds may cover CFM exam and renewal fees for State employees involved in floodplain management. States are also encouraged to sponsor and proctor CFM exams.

Can CAP SSSE funds reimburse ASFPM membership dues?

No. The opportunity explicitly states funding cannot be used to reimburse individual ASFPM membership dues.

What travel costs are described as reimbursable?

Travel costs for State floodplain staff to attend the ASFPM National Conference, FEMA CAP coordination meetings, and State Silver Jackets meetings may be reimbursed. Other relevant meetings may be allowable with advance Regional approval.

Can local officials receive support to attend ASFPM conferences?

In some cases, and with Regional discretion and negotiation, limited funding may support local officials participation in an ASFPM annual conference held within their State.

What general technical assistance activities are eligible?

Eligible activities include general technical assistance to communities and individuals on NFIP floodplain management questions, helping non-participating communities enroll in the NFIP by guiding them through minimum eligibility steps, and supporting communities participating in or seeking to improve within the Community Rating System (CRS).

What CRS-related activities are supported?

CRS support may include technical assistance, entry CAVs, and help with activities that earn CRS credit, which can lower flood insurance premiums for residents when communities adopt stronger practices.

How does this program coordinate with FEMA mapping efforts like Risk MAP?

States must work with FEMA Regions to set mapping priorities and participate in community meetings tied to mapping, including Flood Map Modernization and the Risk MAP initiative.

Can CAP SSSE funds be used to conduct floodplain studies or develop flood maps?

No. FEMA states that CAP SSSE and Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) Program Management funding must be planned separately but coordinated to avoid duplication, and neither program's funds can be used to conduct floodplain studies or develop flood maps.

Are there activities that overlap with the CTP program?

Yes. FEMA notes that some activities can overlap and may be supported through either program, such as map adoption support, training, and outreach. The key expectation is close coordination so resources are complementary and not duplicative.

What other State programs and agencies does FEMA encourage coordination with?

FEMA encourages coordination across Hazard Mitigation Assistance programs (including HMGP, PDM, and FMA) and with State dam safety, land use, building code, and water resources programs, as well as agencies that operate in floodplains (such as transportation departments or port authorities).

Is post-disaster support included in the agreement?

Not typically as part of the annual agreement, but the opportunity anticipates that post-disaster NFIP support may be needed. If a disaster occurs, these tasks can be negotiated and added, but the cooperative agreement must be formally modified.

What kinds of post-disaster tasks are mentioned?

Examples include help with substantial damage determinations, use of FEMA tools like Substantial Damage Estimating Software, promoting and advising on Increased Cost of Compliance coverage, and helping communities connect to mitigation funding opportunities.

What compliance problem areas did FEMA highlight for extra attention in FY 2014?

FEMA specifically highlighted (1) mechanical, electrical, and utility equipment installed below the Base Flood Elevation, and (2) flood openings that do not meet the requirements in 44 CFR 60.3(c)(5). These were cited as making up about half of observed violations in NFIP quantitative compliance assessment findings.

Can FEMA review the State program itself?

Yes. FEMA notes that Regional Offices may sometimes conduct a CAV of the State floodplain management program and may request the State's help with coordination, information gathering, and preparation.

Who is the FEMA Region 3 contact for access issues and coordination?

The listed Region 3 contact is Kathryn Lipiecki, FEMA Region 3 Mitigation Division, 215-931-5655, Kathryn.Lipiecki@fema.dhs.gov.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Region 3

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)

Next opportunity: FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 4

Previous opportunity: Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 10

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 003 99

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (DHS 14 MT 023 003 99) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 4 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 004 99

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 004 99
Agency: Region 4
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 9 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 009 99

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 009 99
Agency: Region 9
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 8 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 008 99

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 008 99
Agency: Region 8
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 5 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 005 99

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 005 99
Agency: Region 5
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element (CAP SSSE) Region 7 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 007 99

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 007 99
Agency: Region 7
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
FY 2014 Community Assistance Program State Support Services Element Region 6 Apply for DHS 14 MT 023 006 99

Funding Number: DHS 14 MT 023 006 99
Agency: Region 6
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Schuylkill River Greenway National Heritage Area Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0057

Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0057
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $30,000
2014 Strategic Planning for the Champlain Heritage Partnership Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0059

Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0059
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $296,500
New Jersey Pinelands Long term Environmental and Economic Monitoring Program under Cooperative Agreement P13AC00554 between the New Jersey Pinelands Commission and the NPS. Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0086

Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0086
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $284,100
Capt. John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail and Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0093

Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0093
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $492,701
Place Based Education Partnership, at March Billings Rockefeller National Historical Park in Woodstock, VT Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0094

Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0094
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $58,050
The Town of Provincetown Race Point/MacMillan Pier Bicycle Connection Apply for NPS 14 NERO 0099

Funding Number: NPS 14 NERO 0099
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $119,600
IMRO Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant Program Apply for NPS IMRO JACS2015

Funding Number: NPS IMRO JACS2015
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
U.S. Mission to the European Union Funding Opportunity Apply for SBE300 15 CA 001 EUR 060315

Funding Number: SBE300 15 CA 001 EUR 060315
Agency: Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $60,000
Connecting Yakutat Youth and Elders to Wrangell St. Elias National Park and Preserve Apply for NPS NOIP15AC000430

Funding Number: NPS NOIP15AC000430
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $15,000
Civilian Conservation Corps Era Dry Stone Wall Restoration Training Apply for NPS 2015GRTE0015

Funding Number: NPS 2015GRTE0015
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $250,000
CONFLICT MITIGATION AND RECONCILIATION PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WITH POSSIBLE MULTIPLE AWARDS Apply for USAID M OAA DCHA DOFDA 08 319 APS

Funding Number: USAID M OAA DCHA DOFDA 08 319 APS
Agency: Agency for International Development
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $35,000,000
Request for Egypt Proposals Apply for DRL 09 EGYPT PROP 051309

Funding Number: DRL 09 EGYPT PROP 051309
Agency: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $1,000,000
Forensic Assistance Programs in AF, EAP, and SCA Apply for DRL 08 FORENSIC 051509

Funding Number: DRL 08 FORENSIC 051509
Agency: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $1,500,000
Request for Elections Related Initiatives in Iraq Apply for DRL 09 IRAQ PROP 090710

Funding Number: DRL 09 IRAQ PROP 090710
Agency: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
Category: Other (see text field entitled Explanation of Other Category of Funding Activity for clarification)
Funding Amount: $12,000,000

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "DHS 14 MT 023 003 99", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.