Opportunity Information: Apply for MP MPC 11 002

  • The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health in the health sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "FY11 Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Project (MYTEP)" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 93.004 Cooperative Agreements to Improve the Health Status of Minority Populations.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Jun 23, 2011 and posted on Jun 2, 2011.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 1, 2011 No Explanation. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $250,000.00 in funding.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 5 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • none
Apply for MP MPC 11 002

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

The FY11 Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Project (MYTEP) was a discretionary federal funding opportunity offered as a cooperative agreement by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. Its central goal was to demonstrate, in real community settings, how well evidence-based tobacco prevention and cessation strategies can work for populations that have historically faced disproportionate tobacco-related harms or gaps in tailored programming. The program specifically targeted racial and ethnic minority youth, including African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and American Indian and Alaska Native youth, as well as low socioeconomic status young women. The intended age range for the young women focus was 13 to 26, reflecting an emphasis on adolescence through young adulthood, when tobacco initiation and progression can be heavily influenced by social environment, targeted marketing, stress, and access to prevention and quitting resources.

MYTEP was structured around two connected components designed to work together. Component 1, the Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Demonstration, was intended for organizations that would directly implement tobacco prevention and cessation activities in their local areas. Up to four grantees were expected to be selected for this demonstration component. These grantees were responsible for identifying the specific needs of their local target populations and putting strategies into practice that reflect those needs. A key expectation was that implementation would not be generic; it would be guided by evidence and adapted for the cultural, linguistic, and practical realities of the communities being served. Component 1 awardees were also expected to rely on expert guidance and recommendations produced through Component 2, making the project a coordinated effort rather than a set of isolated local initiatives.

Component 2, the MYTEP Program Support and Evaluation Center, was designed as the technical backbone of the entire effort and was limited to a single awardee. The Component 2 grantee was expected to convene and work with a panel of tobacco prevention and cessation experts who had knowledge of, and experience with, the needs of racial and ethnic minority populations. This Center would review existing tobacco prevention and cessation reports, research, and guidelines, then translate that information into practical recommendations for tailoring strategies to the targeted communities. In effect, Component 2 served as a centralized support and evaluation hub, helping ensure that the demonstration sites in Component 1 were using approaches grounded in evidence while also being meaningfully adapted to local contexts.

From an administrative standpoint, the opportunity was posted on June 2, 2011, with an application closing date of July 1, 2011, and an archive date of July 31, 2011. The program anticipated making a total of five awards across both components (up to four for the demonstration sites and one for the support and evaluation center). Individual awards were expected to fall between $175,000 (floor) and $250,000 (ceiling). There was no cost sharing or matching requirement, lowering the barrier for organizations that might have strong community reach but limited ability to provide matching funds. The funding was associated with CFDA number 93.004, Cooperative Agreements to Improve the Health Status of Minority Populations, and fell under the Health activity category.

Eligibility was listed broadly as "Others" with a note to consult additional eligibility information in the full announcement, and the synopsis text itself did not spell out further restrictions. The announcement also included a standard access note directing applicants who had trouble obtaining the full posting to the Grants.gov Contact Center, including phone, hours, and email. Overall, MYTEP can be read as a two-tiered demonstration-and-support model intended to prove not just whether evidence-based tobacco interventions work, but whether they can be scaled and adapted effectively for minority youth and low socioeconomic status young women in diverse real-world settings.

FY11 Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Project (MYTEP) - FAQs

What is the FY11 Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Project (MYTEP)?

MYTEP was a discretionary federal funding opportunity offered as a cooperative agreement by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. The focus was on demonstrating, in real community settings, how effective evidence-based tobacco prevention and cessation strategies can be when they are tailored for populations that have experienced disproportionate tobacco-related harms or gaps in culturally appropriate programming.

What was the main goal of MYTEP?

The central goal was to demonstrate how well evidence-based tobacco prevention and cessation approaches work in real-world communities when they are adapted to meet the cultural, linguistic, and practical needs of the targeted populations.

Which populations did MYTEP specifically target?

MYTEP specifically targeted racial and ethnic minority youth, including African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and American Indian and Alaska Native youth. It also targeted low socioeconomic status young women.

What age range was emphasized for the young women focus?

The intended age range for the low socioeconomic status young women focus was 13 to 26, reflecting an emphasis on adolescence through young adulthood.

Why did MYTEP emphasize ages 13 to 26 for young women?

The program emphasized this life stage because tobacco initiation and progression can be strongly influenced during adolescence and young adulthood by factors such as social environment, targeted marketing, stress, and access to prevention and quitting resources.

How was MYTEP structured?

MYTEP was structured around two connected components designed to operate together: (1) the Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Demonstration (local implementation sites) and (2) the MYTEP Program Support and Evaluation Center (centralized technical support and evaluation).

What was Component 1 (the Minority Youth Tobacco Elimination Demonstration)?

Component 1 supported organizations that would directly implement tobacco prevention and cessation activities in their local areas. These grantees were expected to identify the needs of their local target populations and implement strategies that were evidence-based and adapted to local community realities.

How many awards were anticipated for Component 1?

Up to four grantees were expected to be selected for the Component 1 demonstration sites.

What was expected of Component 1 awardees in terms of program design?

Component 1 awardees were expected to avoid generic, one-size-fits-all implementation. Strategies were expected to be guided by evidence and adapted for the cultural, linguistic, and practical realities of the communities being served.

How were Component 1 and Component 2 intended to work together?

Component 1 awardees were expected to rely on expert guidance and recommendations produced through Component 2, making MYTEP a coordinated model rather than a collection of isolated local projects.

What was Component 2 (the MYTEP Program Support and Evaluation Center)?

Component 2 was designed as the technical backbone of the initiative and served as a centralized support and evaluation hub for the overall MYTEP effort.

How many awards were anticipated for Component 2?

Component 2 was limited to a single awardee.

What were the responsibilities of the Component 2 awardee?

The Component 2 grantee was expected to convene and work with a panel of tobacco prevention and cessation experts with knowledge of the needs of racial and ethnic minority populations, review existing reports/research/guidelines, and translate that evidence into practical recommendations for tailoring strategies to the targeted communities.

What role did expert input play in MYTEP?

Expert input was central to Component 2. The Support and Evaluation Center was expected to convene a panel of experts and use their knowledge to help translate existing evidence into actionable recommendations for tailoring interventions for the intended populations.

How many total awards were anticipated across MYTEP?

The program anticipated making a total of five awards across both components (up to four for Component 1 and one for Component 2).

What type of funding mechanism was used?

The opportunity was offered as a cooperative agreement, reflecting an approach where the federally funded effort is designed to be coordinated and supported through a central technical and evaluation function (Component 2) alongside local demonstration implementation (Component 1).

What was the anticipated award size?

Individual awards were expected to range from $175,000 (floor) to $250,000 (ceiling).

Was cost sharing or matching required?

No. The synopsis stated there was no cost sharing or matching requirement.

When was the opportunity posted and when were applications due?

The opportunity was posted on June 2, 2011, and the application closing date was July 1, 2011.

What was the archive date?

The archive date was July 31, 2011.

Which federal office offered this funding opportunity?

The funding opportunity was offered by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health.

What was the CFDA number associated with MYTEP?

The funding was associated with CFDA number 93.004, Cooperative Agreements to Improve the Health Status of Minority Populations.

What activity category did the opportunity fall under?

The opportunity fell under the Health activity category.

Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was listed broadly as "Others," with a note to consult additional eligibility information in the full announcement. The synopsis itself did not provide further restrictions.

Where could applicants get help if they had trouble accessing the full posting?

The announcement included a standard access note directing applicants with trouble obtaining the full posting to the Grants.gov Contact Center, including phone support, hours, and email.

What makes MYTEP different from a typical local tobacco program?

MYTEP was designed as a two-tier demonstration-and-support model. Local sites implemented tailored, evidence-based strategies (Component 1), while a centralized Support and Evaluation Center (Component 2) synthesized evidence and expert input into practical tailoring guidance and helped support coordinated implementation and evaluation.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Health

Next opportunity: Boston African American National Historic Site Program

Previous opportunity: John H. Prescott Marine Mammal Rescue Assistance Grant Program (Prescott Grant Program) for Fiscal Year 2012

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for MP MPC 11 002

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (MP MPC 11 002) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
Epidemiology Program for American Indian/Alaska Native Tribes and Urban Indian Communities Apply for HHS 2011 IHS EPI 0001

Funding Number: HHS 2011 IHS EPI 0001
Agency: Indian Health Service
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $1,000,000
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Regional Training Centers Apply for CDC RFA DD11 1107

Funding Number: CDC RFA DD11 1107
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $300,000
Enhancing Capacity for Environmental and Public Health Surveillance of Unregulated Drinking Water Apply for CDC RFA EH11 1108

Funding Number: CDC RFA EH11 1108
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $70,000
State Based Perinatal Quality Collaboratives Apply for CDC RFA DP11 1110

Funding Number: CDC RFA DP11 1110
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $350,000
National Organizations for State and Local Officials (NOSLO) Apply for HRSA 11 169

Funding Number: HRSA 11 169
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Scaling up HIV/AIDs Prevention Activities for Most at Risk Populations, People living with HIV/AIDs and Orphans and Vulnerable Children in Ghana Apply for APS 641 11 000003

Funding Number: APS 641 11 000003
Agency: Ghana USAID Accra
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $1,200,000
Enhancing Breast Cancer Genomic Practices through Education, Surveillance, and Policy Apply for CDC RFA DP11 1114

Funding Number: CDC RFA DP11 1114
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $300,000
FY11 United States Mexico Border Health Commission Border Health Improvement Initiative Apply for GH GHS 11 001

Funding Number: GH GHS 11 001
Agency: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $1,300,000
Prevention and Public Health Fund Coordinated Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Program Apply for CDC RFA DP09 9010301PPHF11

Funding Number: CDC RFA DP09 9010301PPHF11
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Prevention and Public Health Fund Pacific Islands Coordinated Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Program Apply for CDC RFA DP09 9020303PPHF11

Funding Number: CDC RFA DP09 9020303PPHF11
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Biomarker Study (U01) Apply for RFA NS 12 004

Funding Number: RFA NS 12 004
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Integrated Preclinical/Clinical Program for HIV Topical Microbicides (IPCP HTM) (U19) Apply for RFA AI 11 031

Funding Number: RFA AI 11 031
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Healthy Women of Ukraine Program (HWUP) Apply for RFA 121 11 000002

Funding Number: RFA 121 11 000002
Agency: Ukraine USAID Kiev
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $8,200,000
Small Business Innovation Research on Rare Musculoskeletal, Rheumatic and Skin Diseases (R43) Apply for RFA AR 12 006

Funding Number: RFA AR 12 006
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $300,000
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HIV/AIDS PREVENTION PROGRAM INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HIV/AIDS CONFERENCE Apply for DHAPP BAA11 005

Funding Number: DHAPP BAA11 005
Agency: Naval Supply Systems Command
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $700,000
Academic Administrative Units in Primary Care Primary Care Training and Enhancement Apply for HRSA 11 153

Funding Number: HRSA 11 153
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Physician Faculty Development in Primary Care Program Primary Care Training and Enhancement Apply for HRSA 11 154

Funding Number: HRSA 11 154
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Pre Doctoral Training in Primary Care Apply for HRSA 11 155

Funding Number: HRSA 11 155
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Residency Training in Primary Care Program Apply for HRSA 11 156

Funding Number: HRSA 11 156
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Physician Assistant Training in Primary Care Apply for HRSA 11 162

Funding Number: HRSA 11 162
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "MP MPC 11 002", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.