Opportunity Information: Apply for RFA 114 13 000001
Apply for RFA 114 13 000001
- The Georgia USAID Tbilisi in the environment sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Georgia Waste Management Project" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas.
- This funding opportunity was created on Oct 17, 2012 and posted on Oct 17, 2012.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Dec 14, 2012. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $4,500,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $4,500,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- Local Georgian Non government Organizations only
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Georgia Waste Management Project was a USAID Tbilisi cooperative agreement designed to strengthen waste management systems in two priority regions of Georgia, Kakheti and Adjara. The central aim was to provide professional, hands-on technical services that help regional and municipal authorities move from ad hoc waste handling toward more organized, modern waste management. The opportunity emphasized practical system development and sector support, not just planning, with a clear focus on improving how waste is collected, managed, and ultimately reduced through recycling and better public behavior.
The scope of work centered on developing the waste management sector across several connected areas. A major component was improving waste collection services in targeted municipalities, which typically involves helping local governments assess needs, upgrade collection approaches, and align operations with better standards. Another key priority was enabling the recycling business environment. That implies support for the conditions that make recycling viable, such as identifying recyclable streams, improving sorting and collection practices, linking municipalities with recyclers, and helping establish the basic operational and market relationships that allow recycling activities to scale. Alongside these operational elements, the project also stressed public awareness and engagement, recognizing that long-term improvements depend on residents understanding waste issues and participating in new systems.
Environmental and public health outcomes were explicitly built into the purpose of the award. The project sought to minimize pollution of natural resources caused by landfills, improve air quality, and reduce harmful impacts associated with poor disposal practices. This points to technical assistance that could include better landfill-related management practices, reduced open burning and uncontrolled dumping, and improved handling processes that limit contamination of soil and water. The intended result was a cleaner environment in the targeted regions, with waste handled in ways that reduce pollution and related community risks.
A defining feature of the opportunity was its emphasis on public participation in decision making and system design. That means the implementing organization was expected to support inclusive processes so that community members and stakeholders have a voice as waste management improvements are planned and rolled out. In practice, that can involve consultations, public information campaigns, feedback mechanisms, and collaboration with local institutions to ensure that system changes are understood and accepted, which is often crucial for compliance with collection schedules, separation practices, and fee systems where applicable.
From an administrative standpoint, this was a discretionary funding opportunity issued as a cooperative agreement, meaning USAID anticipated substantial involvement during implementation rather than a fully hands-off grant. The program fell under the Environment activity category and was funded through CFDA 98.001 (USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas). USAID expected to make one award with an estimated total funding amount up to USD 4,500,000, with the award ceiling set at USD 4,500,000 and no stated minimum award floor. There was no cost sharing or matching requirement.
Eligibility was limited to local Georgian non-governmental organizations only, indicating the program was structured to build local capacity and ensure the work was led by organizations based in Georgia with local knowledge and relationships. The funding opportunity number was RFA 114 13 000001. It was posted on October 17, 2012, with an application deadline of December 14, 2012, and it was later archived on January 13, 2013. For applicant support related to accessing the full announcement, the point of contact listed was Elizabeth Colarik, Contracting Agreement Specialist, reachable by phone at 202-216-6272.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the Georgia Waste Management Project?
The Georgia Waste Management Project was a USAID Tbilisi cooperative agreement intended to strengthen waste management systems in two priority regions of Georgia: Kakheti and Adjara. Its focus was on practical, hands-on technical support to help regional and municipal authorities move from ad hoc waste handling toward more organized and modern waste management.
Which regions of Georgia were targeted?
The opportunity specifically targeted two regions: Kakheti and Adjara.
What was the main purpose of this funding opportunity?
The central aim was to provide professional, hands-on technical services to improve how waste is collected, managed, and reduced through recycling and improved public behavior. The emphasis was on building and strengthening systems and sector operations, not only producing plans.
What kind of work did the scope of work emphasize?
The scope of work emphasized developing the waste management sector across multiple connected areas, including improving municipal waste collection services, enabling a recycling business environment, and increasing public awareness and engagement.
What did "improving waste collection services" generally involve under this project?
Improving waste collection services in targeted municipalities generally meant helping local governments assess collection needs, upgrade collection approaches, and align operations with better standards to make collection more organized and effective.
What does "enabling the recycling business environment" mean in this opportunity?
Enabling the recycling business environment refers to supporting the conditions needed for recycling to be viable and scalable. Based on the opportunity description, this could include identifying recyclable waste streams, improving sorting and collection practices, linking municipalities with recyclers, and helping establish basic operational and market relationships that allow recycling activities to grow.
Was public awareness and engagement part of the project?
Yes. Public awareness and engagement were emphasized because long-term improvements depend on residents understanding waste issues and participating in improved waste management systems.
What environmental outcomes was the project intended to achieve?
The project aimed to minimize pollution of natural resources caused by landfills, improve air quality, and reduce harmful impacts associated with poor disposal practices. The intended result was a cleaner environment in the targeted regions through better waste handling and reduced pollution.
What public health outcomes were tied to the project goals?
Public health outcomes were part of the stated purpose through reducing harmful impacts linked to poor disposal practices. By improving collection and handling and reducing uncontrolled dumping or burning, the project intended to lower community risks associated with mismanaged waste.
Did the project include landfill-related improvements?
The purpose and outcomes described point to assistance that could include improved landfill-related management practices and better handling processes to limit contamination of soil and water and reduce air impacts associated with poor disposal practices.
How important was public participation in this opportunity?
Public participation was described as a defining feature. The implementing organization was expected to support inclusive processes so community members and stakeholders could participate in decision making and system design as improvements were planned and rolled out.
What are examples of public participation activities mentioned or implied in the opportunity?
The description suggests activities such as consultations, public information campaigns, feedback mechanisms, and collaboration with local institutions to help ensure changes are understood and accepted, which supports compliance with collection schedules and separation practices.
What type of USAID award was this?
This was a discretionary funding opportunity issued as a cooperative agreement.
What does it mean that the award was a cooperative agreement?
A cooperative agreement means USAID anticipated substantial involvement during implementation, rather than providing a fully hands-off grant.
What was the activity category for this opportunity?
The program fell under the Environment activity category.
What was the CFDA number associated with this opportunity?
The opportunity was funded through CFDA 98.001 (USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas).
How many awards did USAID expect to make?
USAID expected to make one award.
What was the estimated total funding amount?
The estimated total funding amount was up to USD 4,500,000.
What was the award ceiling?
The award ceiling was USD 4,500,000.
Was there a minimum award amount listed?
No. There was no stated minimum award floor.
Was cost sharing or matching required?
No. The opportunity stated there was no cost sharing or matching requirement.
Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was limited to local Georgian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) only.
Did the eligibility rules allow non-Georgian or international organizations to apply?
Based on the eligibility statement provided, the opportunity was limited to local Georgian NGOs only.
What was the funding opportunity number?
The funding opportunity number was RFA 114 13 000001.
When was the opportunity posted?
The opportunity was posted on October 17, 2012.
What was the application deadline?
The application deadline was December 14, 2012.
When was the opportunity archived?
The opportunity was archived on January 13, 2013.
Who was the point of contact for applicant support related to accessing the full announcement?
The listed point of contact was Elizabeth Colarik, Contracting Agreement Specialist.
How could applicants contact the point of contact?
Applicants could reach the point of contact by phone at 202-216-6272.
What was the overall approach emphasized by the opportunity?
The opportunity emphasized practical system development and sector support rather than planning alone, with a focus on improving waste collection, enabling recycling, and encouraging better public behavior to reduce waste impacts.
Why did the opportunity emphasize public behavior and awareness?
The description indicates that long-term improvements depend on residents understanding waste issues and participating in new systems, which is why public awareness and engagement were included as a core component.
Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Georgia USAID Tbilisi
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Environment
Next opportunity: Collaborative Forest Restoration Program
Previous opportunity: Fiscal Year 2013 Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Program (YIP)
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for RFA 114 13 000001
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (RFA 114 13 000001) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Design Technical Assistance and Trinity Management Council (TMC) Support Apply for R13AS20002 Funding Number: R13AS20002 Agency: Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region Category: Environment Funding Amount: $210,850 |
| San Juan River Channel and Floodplain Restoration, Phase 2 Apply for R13SS40005 Funding Number: R13SS40005 Agency: Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Category: Environment Funding Amount: $390,000 |
| Tribal Support for the National Environmental Information Exchange Network Apply for EPA OEI OIC 12 02 Funding Number: EPA OEI OIC 12 02 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $160,000 |
| Baird Creek Property Acquisition Apply for F13AS00005 Funding Number: F13AS00005 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Community based Forest management Programs for REDD Readiness in Zambia Apply for AID 611 A DRAFT PD Funding Number: AID 611 A DRAFT PD Agency: Zambia USAID Lusaka Category: Environment Funding Amount: $11,000,000 |
| FY 2013 Request for Proposals from Indian Tribes and Intertribal Consortia for Nonpoint Source Management Grants Under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 319 Apply for EPA OW OWOW 13 01 Funding Number: EPA OW OWOW 13 01 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $150,000 |
| Request for Proposals (RFP) Increasing Community Awareness and Use of Environmental Information through Education and Outreach Apply for EPA OEI EAD 2012 001 Funding Number: EPA OEI EAD 2012 001 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| Great Lakes Areas of Concern Land Acquisition Grants Apply for NOAA NOS OCRM 2013 2003507 Funding Number: NOAA NOS OCRM 2013 2003507 Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Category: Environment Funding Amount: $800,000 |
| Establish Sage Grouse Advisory Committee Apply for F13AS00031 Funding Number: F13AS00031 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $40,000 |
| Research and data collection for sage grouse habitat Apply for F13AS00032 Funding Number: F13AS00032 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Water Conservation Field Services Program Apply for R13SF40007 Funding Number: R13SF40007 Agency: Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado Region Category: Environment Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Research Grants (Generic Apply for FWS R4 13 002 Funding Number: FWS R4 13 002 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $75,000 |
| NOAA Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Regional Partnership Grants Apply for NOAA NMFS HCPO 2013 2003590 Funding Number: NOAA NMFS HCPO 2013 2003590 Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Category: Environment Funding Amount: $10,000,000 |
| Estuary Habitat Restoration Program Project Solicitation Apply for USACE EHR 001 Funding Number: USACE EHR 001 Agency: Dept. of the Army Corps of Engineers Category: Environment Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| Source Reduction Assistance Grant Program Apply for EPA HQ OPPT 2013 002 Funding Number: EPA HQ OPPT 2013 002 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $147,000 |
| Implementation of actions under the CAP Gila River Basin Native Fish Conservation Program Apply for F09AC00084 Funding Number: F09AC00084 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $375,600 |
| US Decision Makers Course Apply for WWB LAC13 ICCF Funding Number: WWB LAC13 ICCF Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Funding Amount: $25,457 |
| FY 2013 National Network for Environmental Management Studies Fellowship Program Apply for EPA EED 13 01 Funding Number: EPA EED 13 01 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $10,000 |
| Environmental Studies Program Apply for M13AS00002 Funding Number: M13AS00002 Agency: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Category: Environment Funding Amount: $847,000 |
| IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPLIANCE/PREVENTION UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM AND THE CLEANUP OF LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK PROGRAM Apply for EPA OSWER OUST 13 01 Funding Number: EPA OSWER OUST 13 01 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Category: Environment Funding Amount: $6,000,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "RFA 114 13 000001", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.