Opportunity Information: Apply for 15 591
Apply for 15 591
- The National Science Foundation in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Ideas Lab Measuring Big G Challenge" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 47.049 Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
- This funding opportunity was created on Jul 29, 2015 and posted on Jul 29, 2015.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jan 14, 2016. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $2,000,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 5 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The NSF "Ideas Lab Measuring Big G Challenge" (Funding Opportunity 15-591) was a Physics Division opportunity under the Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate aimed at tackling a long-standing and surprisingly practical problem in fundamental physics: we still do not have an agreed-upon high-precision value for Newton's gravitational constant, G. G sets the strength of gravity, and while it is one of the core constants used across physics, it is also notoriously hard to measure accurately because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other fundamental forces. What makes this solicitation notable is that it was not just looking for incremental improvements to existing setups; it was structured as an "Ideas Lab," meaning an intensive, workshop-style program designed to push participants toward unconventional thinking and cross-disciplinary experiment designs that could finally narrow the gap between conflicting measurements.
The scientific motivation behind the program was straightforward but high impact. Even after hundreds of measurements over roughly 250 years, modern experiments have produced values that disagree by about 0.05, which the announcement describes as around 40 times the uncertainty claimed by the best single experiment. That mismatch signals that some experiments are being limited by hard-to-detect systematic errors, or that different methods are sensitive to different subtle effects. NSF framed this as a grand challenge because resolving it is important on two fronts. First, any future theory that successfully unifies gravity with quantum physics (including quantum electrodynamics) might be able to predict G, and a reliable experimental value would become a serious benchmark for testing that theory. Second, the metrology and instrumentation lessons learned from measuring such a tiny force with absolute accuracy have spillover benefits for many other areas, including precision force measurements relevant to the Casimir effect, calibration of spring constants in atomic force microscopy cantilevers, and even force scales involved in biological and molecular systems such as intermolecular forces in DNA.
The central goal of the Ideas Lab was to catalyze brand-new experimental approaches capable of measuring G with relative uncertainties approaching, or even surpassing, 1 part in 100,000 (about 10^-5). NSF explicitly emphasized that mixing researchers from diverse scientific backgrounds was expected to produce fresh perspectives and innovative strategies, rather than relying only on the traditional small circle of groups that have historically performed G measurements. The intended output was not merely discussion; the Ideas Lab was meant to generate multidisciplinary concepts that could mature into full research proposals for NSF support, ultimately leading to next-generation experiments that could validate, reconcile, or improve upon current calculations and measurement techniques.
From an applicant and administrative standpoint, this was a discretionary grant opportunity in the science and technology research and development category. NSF anticipated making about 5 awards, with an estimated total funding level of $2,000,000. There was no cost sharing requirement listed. Eligibility was described as unrestricted (open to any type of entity), with the usual caveat that applicants should follow any clarifications in the solicitation text. Participation started with preliminary proposals submitted by US researchers, and submission for those preliminary proposals was only through NSF FastLane, reflecting the Ideas Lab format where the initial selection is about identifying promising participants and ideas for the in-person intensive. The opportunity was posted July 29, 2015, and the closing date for submissions was January 14, 2016, with the program later archived on February 13, 2016. The CFDA listing was 47.049 (Mathematical and Physical Sciences), and the publication reference was NSF 15-591.
In practical terms, the opportunity can be summarized as NSF trying to "reset the playing field" for one of the most stubborn precision-measurement problems in physics by convening a focused, competitive, and collaborative idea-generation environment. Instead of funding only standard proposals from the start, NSF used the Ideas Lab mechanism to recruit a mix of expertise, pressure-test concepts in real time, and accelerate the formation of teams and experimental plans that could plausibly overcome the systematic limits that have kept G measurements from converging.
NSF Ideas Lab: Measuring Big G Challenge (NSF 15-591) - FAQs
What is the NSF "Ideas Lab Measuring Big G Challenge" (NSF 15-591)?
It was a National Science Foundation (NSF) Physics Division funding opportunity under the Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate focused on developing new experimental approaches to measure Newton's gravitational constant, G, with much higher precision than current results allow.
What scientific problem was this opportunity trying to solve?
The program targeted the long-standing issue that the scientific community still does not have an agreed-upon high-precision value for Newton's gravitational constant, G, even after hundreds of measurements over roughly 250 years.
Why is measuring G so difficult?
G is notoriously hard to measure accurately because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other fundamental forces, making experiments highly sensitive to subtle and hard-to-detect systematic errors.
How inconsistent are current measurements of G?
According to the opportunity description, modern experiments produced values that disagree by about 0.05, which was described as around 40 times the uncertainty claimed by the best single experiment.
What did NSF mean by calling this a "grand challenge"?
NSF framed it as a grand challenge because resolving the discrepancy would both improve fundamental physics benchmarks and drive advances in precision metrology and instrumentation that can benefit other fields.
What was the main technical goal for new measurements of G?
The central goal was to catalyze brand-new experimental approaches capable of measuring G with relative uncertainties approaching, or even surpassing, 1 part in 100,000 (about 10^-5).
Was this solicitation looking for incremental improvements to existing G experiments?
No. It explicitly emphasized unconventional thinking and cross-disciplinary experimental designs, rather than incremental improvements to existing setups.
What is an NSF "Ideas Lab" and how is it different from a standard solicitation?
An Ideas Lab is an intensive, workshop-style program intended to push participants toward unconventional approaches and collaborative, cross-disciplinary designs. In this model, the initial phase emphasizes selecting promising participants and ideas, with the expectation that concepts developed through the Ideas Lab can mature into full NSF research proposals.
What was the intended outcome of participating in the Ideas Lab?
The intended output was to generate multidisciplinary concepts that could mature into full research proposals for NSF support, leading to next-generation experiments that could validate, reconcile, or improve current measurement techniques and results.
Why did NSF emphasize cross-disciplinary participation?
NSF expected that mixing researchers from diverse scientific backgrounds would produce fresh perspectives and innovative strategies, expanding beyond the traditional small circle of groups that have historically performed G measurements.
How could an improved value of G help fundamental physics?
The solicitation noted that any future theory unifying gravity with quantum physics (including quantum electrodynamics) might be able to predict G, and a reliable experimental value would serve as a serious benchmark to test such a theory.
What spillover benefits did NSF cite from improved G measurement capabilities?
NSF highlighted metrology and instrumentation benefits for other precision force measurements, including work related to the Casimir effect, calibration of spring constants in atomic force microscopy (AFM) cantilevers, and force scales relevant to biological and molecular systems such as intermolecular forces in DNA.
Which NSF unit sponsored this opportunity?
It was a Physics Division opportunity under NSF's Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate.
What kind of grant opportunity was this from an administrative standpoint?
It was described as a discretionary grant opportunity in the science and technology research and development category.
How much funding was anticipated and how many awards were expected?
NSF anticipated making about 5 awards, with an estimated total funding level of $2,000,000.
Was cost sharing required?
No cost sharing requirement was listed for this opportunity.
Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was described as unrestricted (open to any type of entity), with the note that applicants should follow any clarifications in the solicitation text.
Who could submit the preliminary proposals?
The opportunity specified that participation started with preliminary proposals submitted by U.S. researchers.
How were preliminary proposals submitted?
Submission for preliminary proposals was only through NSF FastLane.
Why did the solicitation use preliminary proposals?
Because of the Ideas Lab format: the initial selection stage is about identifying promising participants and ideas for an in-person intensive, rather than funding standard proposals immediately.
What were the key dates for this funding opportunity?
The opportunity was posted on July 29, 2015, with a submission closing date of January 14, 2016, and it was later archived on February 13, 2016.
What is the CFDA number associated with this opportunity?
The CFDA listing provided was 47.049 (Mathematical and Physical Sciences).
What is the NSF publication reference number?
The publication reference was NSF 15-591.
In plain terms, what was NSF trying to do with this program?
NSF aimed to "reset the playing field" for one of the most stubborn precision-measurement problems in physics by convening a focused, competitive, collaborative idea-generation environment designed to surface new teams and experimental concepts capable of overcoming systematic limits that have prevented G measurements from converging.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: Advancing Informal STEM Learning
Previous opportunity: Discovery Research PreK 12
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for 15 591
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (15 591) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Advancing Informal STEM Learning Apply for 15 593 Funding Number: 15 593 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $6,000,000 |
| Developing and Updating the Protected Areas Database of the Unived States (PAD US) for the State of Tennessee Apply for USGS 15 FA 0360 Funding Number: USGS 15 FA 0360 Agency: Geological Survey Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation Apply for 15 594 Funding Number: 15 594 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| Early Career Research Program Apply for DE FOA 0001386 Funding Number: DE FOA 0001386 Agency: Office of Science Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $750,000 |
| Long Term Ecological Research Apply for 15 596 Funding Number: 15 596 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience Apply for 15 595 Funding Number: 15 595 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Information Innovation Office (I2O) Office wide Apply for DARPA BAA 15 54 Funding Number: DARPA BAA 15 54 Agency: DARPA Information Innovation Office Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Vegetation Plot Data Harvest and Analysis in Support of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification Apply for USGS 15 FA 0423 Funding Number: USGS 15 FA 0423 Agency: Geological Survey Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $80,000 |
| Archeology, History, and Museum Collections Cultural Resource Program Apply for P15AS00264 Funding Number: P15AS00264 Agency: National Park Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| Data Collection and Data Sharing Apply for USGS FA 11 0546 Funding Number: USGS FA 11 0546 Agency: Geological Survey Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $56,000 |
| Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure Apply for 15 598 Funding Number: 15 598 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Developing and Assisting the Protected Areas Database of the Unied States (PAD US) Apply for USGS 15 FA 0361 Funding Number: USGS 15 FA 0361 Agency: Geological Survey Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Appalachian State University Cooperative Agreement Apply for F15AS00408 Funding Number: F15AS00408 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers Apply for 15 599 Funding Number: 15 599 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Science Advisor to the Director, NPS Apply for P15AS00283 Funding Number: P15AS00283 Agency: National Park Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $210,000 |
| Automation for UxV based Mine Countermeasures Apply for N00014 15 R SN11 Funding Number: N00014 15 R SN11 Agency: Office of Naval Research Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Global Chemical Security Effectiveness Study Apply for ISN ISNCTR 15 007 Funding Number: ISN ISNCTR 15 007 Agency: Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferat Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $215,000 |
| Innovative Vacuum Electronics Science and Technology (INVEST) Apply for DARPA BAA 15 40 Funding Number: DARPA BAA 15 40 Agency: DARPA Microsystems Technology Office Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD Polymer Preservation Techniques Apply for P15AS00301 Funding Number: P15AS00301 Agency: National Park Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Integrated Earth Systems Apply for 15 600 Funding Number: 15 600 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $3,000,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "15 591", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
