Opportunity Information: Apply for CDC RFA CE13 1303

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the health sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Implementation of Essentials for Childhood Safe, Stable, Nurturing Relationships and Environments" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 93.136 Injury Prevention and Control Research and State and Community Based Programs.
  • This funding opportunity was created on May 7, 2013 and posted on May 7, 2013.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Jun 24, 2013 Letter of Intent Deadline Date May 30, 2013 (letter of intent is optional) Application Deadline Date June 24, 2013, 1159 p.m. U.S. Eastern Standard Time, on www.grants.gov. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $4,500,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $200,000.00 in funding.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 5 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • 1. Eligible Applicants State health departments or their Bona Fide Agents (this includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianna Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau). A Bona Fide Agent is an agency/organization identified by the state as eligible to submit an application under the state eligibility in lieu of a state application. If applying as a bona fide agent of a state health department, a legal, binding agreement from the state government as documentation of the status is required. 2. Special Eligibility Requirements State Health Departments or their Bona Fide Agents
Apply for CDC RFA CE13 1303

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

This grant opportunity, titled "Implementation of Essentials for Childhood Safe, Stable, Nurturing Relationships and Environments," was a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discretionary funding program designed to strengthen child maltreatment prevention through coordinated, statewide, multi-sector work. The core idea behind the funding is the CDC "Essentials for Childhood" approach, which emphasizes building the conditions that help children thrive by promoting safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments (often abbreviated as SSNRE). Rather than funding a single program or service line, the award focused on building sustainable collective impact efforts across systems, meaning the work is meant to align multiple agencies and community partners around shared goals, shared measures, and mutually reinforcing strategies.

The intended recipients were state health departments or their designated Bona Fide Agents, including U.S. states and specific territories and freely associated states listed in the announcement (such as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and several Pacific Island jurisdictions). If an organization applied as a Bona Fide Agent, it had to provide formal documentation from the state government showing it was legally authorized to apply on the state's behalf. There was no cost-sharing or matching requirement, which lowered the barrier for states to participate.

The funding mechanism was a cooperative agreement, which typically means the CDC expected to have substantial involvement beyond simply issuing funds. In practice, that usually translates into closer collaboration with the awardees on planning, implementation, performance monitoring, and reporting, as well as alignment with CDC frameworks and required evaluation or accountability practices. The program fell under CFDA 93.136, categorized as Injury Prevention and Control Research and State and Community Based Programs, signaling that the work is viewed as prevention-oriented public health infrastructure, not only social services.

In terms of what funded states were expected to do, the grant centered on five major responsibilities. First, awardees were expected to coordinate and manage both existing and new partnerships. This included traditional child maltreatment prevention organizations as well as "non-traditional" partners, which usually means sectors not always at the table for child well-being work, such as business, housing, transportation, workforce development, education, early childhood systems, health care, public safety, and faith or community organizations. The purpose of bringing in non-traditional partners was to shift from isolated interventions to broader systems change that influences the environments where families live and children grow.

Second, states were expected to work with these partners to identify strategies across sectors that promote SSNRE. This is an important point because it implies a cross-sector strategy set rather than a single evidence-based program. The strategies could include policy, systems, and environmental approaches that change the conditions associated with maltreatment risk and protective factors at the population level, such as strengthening economic supports for families, improving access to quality early childhood care, promoting positive parenting norms, and enhancing community connectedness and safe neighborhoods. The announcement language highlights identification and selection of strategies as a collaborative process, which is consistent with collective impact models where partners jointly choose actions tied to a shared agenda.

Third, awardees were responsible for identifying, coordinating, monitoring, and reporting on strategies implemented by multi-sector partners. This positions the state health department as a backbone or coordinating entity, responsible for keeping the overall effort organized and accountable. Monitoring and reporting responsibilities imply that states needed to develop performance measures, track implementation progress across partners, and provide updates to the CDC on what was being done, by whom, and with what outputs and early outcomes. It also suggests that the CDC expected measurable activity and not just coalition-building.

Fourth, states were required to coordinate improvement processes for partners, including approaches like continuous quality improvement (CQI). This expectation goes beyond tracking progress and moves into actively refining strategies based on data and feedback loops. CQI usually involves setting aims, testing changes, reviewing data on a regular cadence, learning what is working (and what is not), and then adjusting implementation. For multi-sector efforts, this can include strengthening referral pathways between agencies, improving the fidelity or reach of partner-led strategies, and removing barriers that prevent families from accessing supportive resources.

Fifth, the program required states to establish state-level impact of the collective efforts. This is a higher bar than documenting activities. It points to demonstrating changes at the state level that reflect improvements in conditions linked to SSNRE and, potentially, reductions in risk factors for child maltreatment over time. While the summary text does not list specific required indicators, the phrase "state-level impact" implies the need for a shared measurement approach and some level of evaluation design, even if the grant amount suggests a focus on practical, feasible measures rather than large-scale research.

Administratively, the CDC anticipated making five awards, with an estimated total funding amount of $4.5 million. Individual awards ranged from a floor of $155,000 to a ceiling of $200,000. The opportunity was posted May 7, 2013, with an optional letter of intent due May 30, 2013, and applications due June 24, 2013 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time through Grants.gov. The archived date was July 24, 2013, indicating the competition is no longer active and is presented as historical record. For applicants who had trouble accessing the full announcement, the CDC Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section (TIMS) was listed as the contact point, with a phone number provided.

Overall, this opportunity was structured to help state health departments play a convening and coordinating role in a statewide prevention agenda, using a collective impact model to align diverse partners around strategies that improve family and community conditions. The emphasis was less on funding direct services and more on building durable cross-sector infrastructure, selecting and managing aligned strategies, using continuous improvement, and demonstrating measurable state-level progress toward safer, more stable, and more nurturing relationships and environments for children.

FAQs: Implementation of Essentials for Childhood Safe, Stable, Nurturing Relationships and Environments (CDC)

1) What is the title of this grant opportunity?

The opportunity is titled "Implementation of Essentials for Childhood Safe, Stable, Nurturing Relationships and Environments."

2) Which federal agency offered this funding?

This was a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discretionary funding program.

3) What is the main purpose of the funding?

The purpose was to strengthen child maltreatment prevention through coordinated, statewide, multi-sector work aligned with the CDC "Essentials for Childhood" approach, emphasizing safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments (SSNRE).

4) What does SSNRE stand for in this opportunity?

SSNRE refers to safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments.

5) Is this grant meant to fund one specific program or direct service line?

No. The award emphasized building sustainable collective impact efforts across systems rather than funding a single program or service line.

6) What kind of approach does the opportunity promote?

It promotes the CDC "Essentials for Childhood" approach and uses a collective impact model, aligning multiple agencies and partners around shared goals, shared measures, and mutually reinforcing strategies.

7) Who was eligible to apply?

Eligible applicants were state health departments or their designated Bona Fide Agents, including U.S. states and specified territories and freely associated states listed in the announcement (such as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and several Pacific Island jurisdictions).

8) What is a Bona Fide Agent in the context of this opportunity?

A Bona Fide Agent is an organization designated to apply on a state's behalf. If applying as a Bona Fide Agent, the applicant needed formal documentation from the state government showing legal authorization to apply for the state.

9) Was cost-sharing or matching required?

No. The opportunity stated there was no cost-sharing or matching requirement.

10) What funding mechanism was used?

The mechanism was a cooperative agreement.

11) What does a cooperative agreement imply for how CDC works with awardees?

In this opportunity, the cooperative agreement structure meant CDC expected substantial involvement beyond issuing funds, including closer collaboration on planning, implementation, performance monitoring, reporting, and alignment with CDC frameworks and evaluation/accountability practices.

12) What CFDA number was associated with this program?

The program was listed under CFDA 93.136.

13) How was the program categorized?

It was categorized as "Injury Prevention and Control Research and State and Community Based Programs," reflecting a prevention-oriented public health infrastructure focus.

14) What were the major responsibilities for funded states?

The announcement described five major responsibilities: (1) coordinate and manage partnerships; (2) work with partners to identify strategies across sectors that promote SSNRE; (3) identify, coordinate, monitor, and report on partner-implemented strategies; (4) coordinate improvement processes such as continuous quality improvement (CQI); and (5) establish state-level impact of the collective efforts.

15) What kinds of partners were states expected to engage?

Awardees were expected to coordinate both traditional child maltreatment prevention organizations and "non-traditional" partners. Examples of non-traditional sectors mentioned include business, housing, transportation, workforce development, education, early childhood systems, health care, public safety, and faith or community organizations.

16) Why did the opportunity emphasize non-traditional partners?

The goal was to move from isolated interventions to broader systems change that influences the environments where families live and children grow.

17) What types of strategies were states expected to identify and select?

States were expected to work with partners to identify cross-sector strategies that promote SSNRE, including policy, systems, and environmental approaches that change conditions associated with maltreatment risk and protective factors at the population level.

18) What are examples of cross-sector strategies referenced in the opportunity description?

Examples mentioned include strengthening economic supports for families, improving access to quality early childhood care, promoting positive parenting norms, and enhancing community connectedness and safe neighborhoods.

19) What was the state's role in implementation once strategies were chosen?

The state was positioned as a backbone or coordinating entity responsible for identifying, coordinating, monitoring, and reporting on strategies implemented by multi-sector partners, helping keep the effort organized and accountable.

20) What did monitoring and reporting generally involve under this opportunity?

It implied developing performance measures, tracking implementation progress across partners, and providing updates to CDC on what was being done, by whom, and what outputs and early outcomes were being observed.

21) What is CQI and how did it relate to this grant?

CQI refers to continuous quality improvement. Under this opportunity, states were expected to coordinate improvement processes for partners, using data and feedback loops to refine strategies over time.

22) What kinds of improvements might CQI support in a multi-sector effort?

Examples described include strengthening referral pathways between agencies, improving the fidelity or reach of partner-led strategies, and removing barriers that prevent families from accessing supportive resources.

23) What does "state-level impact" mean in this opportunity?

The opportunity required states to establish state-level impact of collective efforts, which goes beyond documenting activities and points toward demonstrating measurable changes in conditions linked to SSNRE and potentially reductions in risk factors for child maltreatment over time.

24) Did the description list specific required indicators for impact?

No specific required indicators were listed in the provided summary. However, the requirement to demonstrate state-level impact implies the need for shared measurement and some form of practical evaluation approach.

25) How many awards did CDC anticipate making?

CDC anticipated making five awards.

26) What was the estimated total funding amount?

The estimated total funding amount was $4.5 million.

27) What was the expected award size per recipient?

Individual awards were expected to range from $155,000 (floor) to $200,000 (ceiling).

28) When was the opportunity posted?

The opportunity was posted on May 7, 2013.

29) Was a letter of intent required?

The letter of intent was optional.

30) When was the optional letter of intent due?

The optional letter of intent was due May 30, 2013.

31) When were applications due?

Applications were due June 24, 2013 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.

32) How were applications submitted?

Applications were submitted through Grants.gov.

33) Is this funding opportunity still active?

No. The opportunity was archived on July 24, 2013, indicating the competition is no longer active and is presented as a historical record.

34) Who was listed as a contact for issues accessing the full announcement?

For applicants who had trouble accessing the full announcement, the CDC Procurement and Grants Office Technical Information Management Section (TIMS) was listed as the contact point, with a phone number provided in the announcement.

35) What is the overall emphasis of this opportunity in terms of use of funds?

The overall emphasis was on helping state health departments convene and coordinate a statewide prevention agenda, align diverse partners, manage and improve aligned strategies, and demonstrate measurable progress toward safer, more stable, and more nurturing relationships and environments for children.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Health

Next opportunity: FY 2013 Funding Opportunity Announcement for NGO Programs Benefiting Sri Lankan Refugees in Tamil Nadu, India

Previous opportunity: Applied Science Grants and Cooperative Agreements for the Desert Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for CDC RFA CE13 1303

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (CDC RFA CE13 1303) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
Grants for Injury Control Research Centers Apply for RFA CE 14 001

Funding Number: RFA CE 14 001
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $900,000
Grants to States to Support Health Insurance Rate Review and Increase Transparency in Health Care Pricing, Cycle III Apply for PR PRP 13 001

Funding Number: PR PRP 13 001
Agency: CMS Consumer Information Insurance Oversight
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $5,000,000
National Cooperative Reprogrammed Cell Research Groups (NCRCRG) to Study Mental Illness (U19) Apply for PAR 13 225

Funding Number: PAR 13 225
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Improvement of Animal Models and Development of Technologies for Stem Cell Based Regenerative Medicine (SBIR)(R43/R44) Apply for PA 13 223

Funding Number: PA 13 223
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Improvement of Animal Models and Development of Technologies for Stem Cell Based Regenerative Medicine (STTR)(R41/R42) Apply for PA 13 224

Funding Number: PA 13 224
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Limited Competition Mental Health Research Network II (U19) Apply for RFA MH 14 110

Funding Number: RFA MH 14 110
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
National Innovative Partnerships for Addressing Obesity through Environmental Supports for Nutrition and Physical Activity Apply for CDC RFA DP13 1304

Funding Number: CDC RFA DP13 1304
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $200,000
Limited Competition Enhancing Investments in Comparative Effectiveness Research Resources (R01) Apply for RFA HS 13 011

Funding Number: RFA HS 13 011
Agency: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $750,000
National Technical Assistance Resource Center for the Prevention of Sexual Violence Apply for CDC RFA CE13 1306

Funding Number: CDC RFA CE13 1306
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $1,500,000
SLEEP AND SLEEP DISORDER Apply for CDC RFA DP13 1306

Funding Number: CDC RFA DP13 1306
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $250,000
It Takes a Village Building State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Partnerships for Community Preparedness and Response Apply for CDC RFA CE13 1308

Funding Number: CDC RFA CE13 1308
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $200,000
Functional Glycomics in HIV Vaccine Design (R01) Apply for RFA AI 12 056

Funding Number: RFA AI 12 056
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Making Disasters Less Disastrous Public Health, Healthcare Executives, and Emergency Management Working Together Apply for CDC RFA CE13 1309

Funding Number: CDC RFA CE13 1309
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $200,000
Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Building Capacity and Networks to Address Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Americas Apply for CDC RFA CK13 1301

Funding Number: CDC RFA CK13 1301
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Tribal Public Health Capacity Building and Quality Improvement Apply for CDC RFA OT13 1303

Funding Number: CDC RFA OT13 1303
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $100,000
Coordinating Center for Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Apply for HRSA 13 203

Funding Number: HRSA 13 203
Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Agreements for State sponsored Youth Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention (Short Title State and Tribal Youth Suicide Prevention Grants) Apply for SM 13 010

Funding Number: SM 13 010
Agency: Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Adminis.
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $440,000
STD Laboratory based Surveillance and Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) Apply for CDC RFA PS14 1401

Funding Number: CDC RFA PS14 1401
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $500,000
Fistual Prevention and Repair Project Apply for SOL OAA 13 000079

Funding Number: SOL OAA 13 000079
Agency: USAID
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $75,000,000
Health Care Innovation Awards Round Two Apply for CMS 1C1 14 001

Funding Number: CMS 1C1 14 001
Agency: Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $30,000,000

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "CDC RFA CE13 1303", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.