Opportunity Information: Apply for PD 11 1393
Apply for PD 11 1393
- The National Science Foundation in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Integrative Paleoanthropology Grants (IPG)" and is now available to receive applicants.
- This funding opportunity was created on Dec 30, 2010 and posted on Dec 30, 2010.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Apr 15, 2011 Please note that proposals should be submitted to either the Physical Anthropology (PD 98 1392) or the Archaeology (PD 98 1391) program. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $1,000,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The National Science Foundation (NSF) Integrative Paleoanthropology Grants (IPG) opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number PD 11 1393) was a discretionary, research-focused grant competition run through NSF's Physical Anthropology and Archaeology Programs. Its central purpose was to push the field toward genuinely innovative, boundary-crossing work that helps explain the underlying principles shaping hominin biological and behavioral evolution across deep time. In other words, the program was not just looking for another interdisciplinary paleoanthropology project; it was explicitly trying to incentivize ambitious syntheses that connect ideas, data, and methods in ways that substantially exceed what is considered typical practice in the field.
Funding was structured around a single expected award, contingent on the availability of funds. The planned award in 2011 had a maximum ceiling of $1,000,000 total, supporting a multi-year project of up to five years in duration. NSF also signaled that, depending on how strong the response was and how funding conditions evolved, the agency might turn this into a longer-term, annually recurring competition in future years. There was no cost sharing or matching requirement stated for applicants, and eligibility was listed as unrestricted, meaning proposals could come from any type of entity permitted under NSF's general rules (subject to any clarifications that might appear in the full program text).
A defining feature of IPG was its strict emphasis on integration and innovation as a review-critical requirement. The intellectual target area was relatively focused: proposals needed to address fundamental questions about hominin evolution over deep time, including biological and behavioral dimensions. However, the program deliberately placed few limits on the approaches investigators could use. NSF explicitly noted that tools and perspectives from outside the traditional paleoanthropology toolkit could be directly relevant, naming examples such as cognitive science, genetics, and mathematical modeling. Integration could take multiple forms: it could mean crossing disciplinary lines (for example, linking archaeological evidence with genetic inference and computational models), but it could also mean building broader comparative frameworks across regions or time periods, or developing synthetic approaches that unite multiple scales of analysis.
Because paleoanthropology often already involves interdisciplinary collaboration, NSF acknowledged that "integrative" can be hard to define. To address this, IPG required applicants to make the case plainly and specifically in the project description. Proposals were expected to devote up to two pages (within the standard 15-page project description limit) to explain (1) how the work is integrative and innovative beyond current norms, and (2) why the research could not be accomplished without the proposed integrative design. Reviewers and NSF program officials were instructed to place significant weight on this justification, making it a central differentiator between competitive and noncompetitive submissions.
Administrative instructions were straightforward but important. Applicants had to submit their proposal by April 15, 2011, and submit it to either the Physical Anthropology Program (PD 98 1392) or the Archaeology Program (PD 98 1391), following the standard guidelines of those programs except for the special IPG target date. Proposals needed to be clearly labeled by adding the "IPG" prefix to the application title. The competition used both external (ad hoc) review and a specially constituted panel, and standard NSF merit review criteria also applied in addition to the IPG-specific emphasis on innovation and integration.
Finally, the solicitation highlighted two NSF-wide compliance requirements that applicants needed to build into their submission package. Any proposal requesting postdoctoral support had to include a Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan. Separately, starting January 18, 2011, NSF required all proposals to include a Data Management Plan. Both documents were to be uploaded in FastLane under Supplementary Documents. These requirements were not optional add-ons; they were presented as proposal components that needed to be properly included for the submission to be compliant and review-ready.
Integrative Paleoanthropology Grants (IPG) - FAQs
What is the NSF Integrative Paleoanthropology Grants (IPG) opportunity?
The Integrative Paleoanthropology Grants (IPG) opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number PD 11 1393) was a discretionary, research-focused NSF grant competition run through NSF's Physical Anthropology and Archaeology Programs. Its purpose was to drive genuinely innovative, boundary-crossing research that helps explain the underlying principles shaping hominin biological and behavioral evolution across deep time.
What was the main goal of IPG?
IPG aimed to incentivize ambitious syntheses that connect ideas, data, and methods in ways that substantially exceed typical practice in paleoanthropology. It was not simply seeking standard interdisciplinary projects; it emphasized integration and innovation as central, review-critical requirements.
Was this program focused on a specific scientific topic area?
Yes. Proposals needed to address fundamental questions about hominin evolution over deep time, including both biological and behavioral dimensions. Within that focus, NSF deliberately placed few limits on the approaches investigators could use.
How much funding was available, and how many awards were expected?
Funding was structured around a single expected award, contingent on the availability of funds. The planned 2011 award had a maximum ceiling of $1,000,000 total.
How long could an IPG project last?
The award was intended to support a multi-year project of up to five years in duration.
Was the IPG competition expected to continue in future years?
NSF indicated that, depending on the strength of the response and funding conditions, the agency might turn IPG into a longer-term, annually recurring competition in future years.
Was cost sharing or matching required?
No cost sharing or matching requirement was stated for applicants.
Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was listed as unrestricted, meaning proposals could come from any type of entity permitted under NSF's general rules (subject to any clarifications that might appear in the full program text).
What did NSF mean by "integration" in this program?
Integration could take several forms. It could mean crossing disciplinary lines (for example, linking archaeological evidence with genetic inference and computational models), building broader comparative frameworks across regions or time periods, or developing synthetic approaches that unite multiple scales of analysis. NSF also recognized that paleoanthropology is often interdisciplinary already, so applicants had to define and justify integration clearly and specifically.
What kinds of tools or disciplines did NSF explicitly name as relevant?
NSF noted that tools and perspectives from outside the traditional paleoanthropology toolkit could be directly relevant, giving examples such as cognitive science, genetics, and mathematical modeling.
What was the most review-critical requirement for IPG proposals?
A defining feature of IPG was its strict emphasis on integration and innovation. Reviewers and NSF program officials were instructed to place significant weight on the proposal's justification for being integrative and innovative beyond current norms.
How were applicants expected to justify that their project was truly integrative and innovative?
Within the standard 15-page project description limit, proposals were expected to devote up to two pages to explain: (1) how the work is integrative and innovative beyond current norms, and (2) why the research could not be accomplished without the proposed integrative design.
What was the submission deadline for this opportunity?
Applicants had to submit their proposal by April 15, 2011.
Where did applicants submit the proposal within NSF?
Applicants had to submit to either the Physical Anthropology Program (PD 98 1392) or the Archaeology Program (PD 98 1391), following the standard guidelines of those programs except for the special IPG target date.
Were there any special labeling or title requirements for the proposal?
Yes. Proposals needed to be clearly labeled by adding the "IPG" prefix to the application title.
How were proposals reviewed?
The competition used both external (ad hoc) review and a specially constituted panel. Standard NSF merit review criteria applied, in addition to the IPG-specific emphasis on innovation and integration.
Did IPG proposals still need to meet standard NSF merit review criteria?
Yes. Standard NSF merit review criteria applied alongside the IPG-specific expectations.
What compliance documents were highlighted as required components of the proposal?
The solicitation highlighted two NSF-wide requirements that applicants needed to include in their submission package: a Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (if requesting postdoctoral support) and a Data Management Plan (required for all proposals as of January 18, 2011).
When was the NSF Data Management Plan requirement effective for this competition?
Starting January 18, 2011, NSF required all proposals to include a Data Management Plan.
When is a Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan required?
Any proposal requesting postdoctoral support had to include a Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan.
Where were the Data Management Plan and Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan uploaded?
Both documents were to be uploaded in FastLane under Supplementary Documents.
Were the Data Management Plan and Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan optional?
No. They were presented as proposal components that needed to be properly included for the submission to be compliant and review-ready.
What proposal format constraints were mentioned for the integrative justification?
The integrative and innovative justification was expected to fit within the standard 15-page project description limit, with up to two pages devoted specifically to the integration/innovation justification and necessity of the integrative design.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: OVC FY 11 2012 NCVRW Resource Guide
Previous opportunity: Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program, Fire Prevention and Safety Grants
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for PD 11 1393
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (PD 11 1393) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| ROSES 2010 Advanced Component Technology Apply for NNH10ZDA001N ACT Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N ACT Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2010 Strategic Astrophysics Technology Apply for NNH10ZDA001N SAT Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N SAT Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Precision Measurement Grants Program Apply for 2011 PMGP 01 Funding Number: 2011 PMGP 01 Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Engineering Design and Innovation Apply for PD 11 1464 Funding Number: PD 11 1464 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2011 Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) NIST GAITHERSBURG Apply for SURF G 2011 01 Funding Number: SURF G 2011 01 Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2011 Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) NIST BOULDER Apply for SURF B 2011 01 Funding Number: SURF B 2011 01 Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2010 Heliophysics Research Solar and Heliospheric Science Apply for NNH10ZDA001N SHP Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N SHP Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2010 Airborne Science UAS Enabled Earth Science Apply for NNH10ZDA001N UAS Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N UAS Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Mathematics of Sensing, Exploitation, and Execution (MSEE) Apply for DARPA BAA 11 28 Funding Number: DARPA BAA 11 28 Agency: DARPA Defense Sciences Office Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology Apply for 11 520 Funding Number: 11 520 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $5,000,000 |
| Geomorphology and Land Use Dynamics Apply for 09 537 Funding Number: 09 537 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $500,000 |
| Collider Detector Research and Development Program Apply for DE FOA 0000438 Funding Number: DE FOA 0000438 Agency: Chicago Service Center Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences Postdoctoral Research Fellowships Apply for 11 521 Funding Number: 11 521 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Science, Technology, Engineering Mathematics (STEM) with Focus on Robotics Apply for KYPTBAA 11 0001 Funding Number: KYPTBAA 11 0001 Agency: NUWC Division Keyport Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $80,000 |
| 2011 DHS Scientific Leadership Bridge Awards for Minority Serving Institutions Granting Two Year Associate Degrees Apply for DHS 11 ST 062 001 Funding Number: DHS 11 ST 062 001 Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $250,000 |
| 2011 DHS Scientific Leadership Awards for Minority Serving Institutions Granting Graduate Degrees Apply for DHS 11 ST 062 003 Funding Number: DHS 11 ST 062 003 Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $400,000 |
| Automated Extraction of Grade Crossing Features from LIDAR Data Phase 2 Apply for FR RRD 11 001 Funding Number: FR RRD 11 001 Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| Electronics, Photonics, and Magnetic Devices Apply for PD 11 1517 Funding Number: PD 11 1517 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Communications, Circuits, and Sensing Systems Apply for PD 11 7564 Funding Number: PD 11 7564 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Direct Digital to High Power Analog Conversion Technology (PowerDAC) Apply for DARPA BAA 11 12 Funding Number: DARPA BAA 11 12 Agency: DARPA Microsystems Technology Office Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "PD 11 1393", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
