Mathematical Biology | Apply Online

NSF Mathematical Biology Program (PD 12 7334) - Frequently Asked Questions

What is the NSF Mathematical Biology Program (Funding Opportunity Number PD 12 7334)?

The NSF Mathematical Biology Program is a discretionary research grant opportunity that supports mathematically driven research with clear relevance to the biological sciences. The program targets projects where mathematics is not just a tool for analysis, but a central research contribution that advances applied and computational mathematics while tackling biologically meaningful questions.

What kind of work is the program trying to fund?

The program looks for projects that are mathematically innovative and biologically important. Competitive proposals are expected to introduce new mathematical theory, new modeling frameworks, or new computational/statistical approaches, and apply them to biological problems that biologists view as significant. The strongest projects show real two-way interaction: biology motivates the mathematics, and the mathematics changes what can be learned about the biology.

What does "mathematically innovative" mean in this program's context?

In this context, "mathematically innovative" means the proposal contributes something meaningfully new on the mathematics side, such as new theory, original model structures, or novel computational and statistical methods. The program is not primarily aimed at projects that only apply existing, well-established methods to biological data or systems without substantially advancing the underlying mathematics.

Are proposals that mainly apply standard methods to biology a good fit?

Generally, no. The program description draws a boundary around projects that mainly use established mathematical, statistical, or computational tools to address biological questions without pushing the mathematics forward in a significant way. Even if the biological application is compelling, proposals built primarily around off-the-shelf approaches may not meet the expectations for mathematics-oriented review tracks within the Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS).

How does this program fit within NSF's Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS)?

The Mathematical Biology Program sits within NSF's DMS and overlaps with several DMS disciplinary programs. Relevant areas can include (as examples provided) topology, probability, statistics, computation, and other branches of modern mathematics. Because of this overlap, applicants may need to decide whether their proposal should be submitted to a specific DMS disciplinary program, with Mathematical Biology involved through co-review.

If my project aligns with a DMS disciplinary program, where should I submit?

If a proposal clearly aligns with a DMS disciplinary program, NSF advises submitting it to the most relevant disciplinary program and requesting co-review by Mathematical Biology as a secondary program. NSF also suggests typically choosing the disciplinary program with the earliest deadline to improve the chance that the proposal can be included in all relevant review cycles.

What is "co-review," and why does it matter?

Co-review refers to having a proposal reviewed by more than one program (for example, a DMS disciplinary program and Mathematical Biology). It matters because the best review alignment often requires input from multiple communities, especially for interdisciplinary proposals. The opportunity notes that co-review is possible, but it depends on timing and routing so the proposal reaches all relevant programs in time for their review processes.

How important is timing for co-review?

Timing is critical. The program description emphasizes that proposals can be co-reviewed only if they arrive early enough to be included in all the relevant programs' review cycles. If the timing does not work, the proposal may be reviewed by only a subset of programs or, in some cases, returned without review.

Can a proposal be returned without review?

Yes. The description explicitly notes that if timing and routing do not work for proposals that belong in more than one place, NSF may review the proposal only in a subset of programs or potentially return it without review.

How interdisciplinary is this program?

The program is strongly interdisciplinary. Mathematical Biology interacts with all divisions in NSF's Directorate for Biological Sciences and overlaps with multiple divisions in the Directorate for Engineering. Joint reviews are described as common, reflecting the expectation that funded work meaningfully connects mathematics with biology (and sometimes engineering).

Should applicants contact program officers before submitting?

Yes. NSF explicitly encourages investigators to talk with program officers on both the mathematics side and the relevant biology or engineering side. These conversations can help determine the best submission route and whether co-review makes sense for a particular project.

What should a strong proposal narrative emphasize?

Based on the program description, a strong narrative should emphasize both (1) mathematical rigor and innovation (new theory, frameworks, or methods) and (2) biological significance (questions that matter to biologists). The program also stresses that mathematics and biology should inform each other rather than being presented as two separate tracks placed side by side.

How many awards were expected under this opportunity?

The opportunity listed an expected 30 awards.

Is cost sharing or matching required?

No. The opportunity states there is no cost sharing or matching requirement.

What is the CFDA number associated with this opportunity?

The opportunity is associated with CFDA number 47.049 (Mathematical and Physical Sciences).

Who is eligible to apply?

Eligibility is described as unrestricted (open to any type of entity), subject to any clarifications in the full announcement materials.

When was the opportunity posted, and what were the due dates?

The posting information indicates the opportunity was originally posted on May 14, 2012. It lists an annual submission window around November 1 to November 15, due by 5 p.m. local time.

Is this opportunity still open?

The historical information provided indicates it later closed and was ultimately archived on December 16, 2020.

What should applicants do if they have technical issues accessing the announcement via Grants.gov?

NSF directs users to Grants.gov support for access or technical issues. The support email provided is grantsgovsupport@nsf.gov.

How should applicants decide between submitting to Mathematical Biology versus another DMS disciplinary program?

The description suggests using scientific fit and routing logistics together. If the work clearly fits a DMS disciplinary program, NSF advises submitting there and requesting co-review by Mathematical Biology. Because review depends heavily on timing and routing, NSF also notes that choosing the program with the earliest deadline can help ensure co-review across relevant programs remains feasible.

What is the main takeaway for applicants trying to route their proposal correctly?

The main takeaway is that both content and process matter: the project should advance mathematics in a way that matters for biology, and the proposal should be submitted in the right place (and early enough) to reach the intended reviewers and to be considered for co-review where appropriate.