Opportunity Information: Apply for W81XWH 16 R MSI1

  • The DOD-AMRAA in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Medical Simulation and Information Sciences" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 12.420.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Mar 28, 2016 and posted on Mar 28, 2016.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Aug 29, 2016. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $1,250,000.00 in funding.
  • Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility.
Apply for W81XWH 16 R MSI1

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

The Department of Defense, through DOD-AMRAA, offered a Medical Simulation and Information Sciences funding opportunity (W81XWH-16-R-MSI1) focused on a project called PREEMPT, short for Predictive Personality and Emotional State Performance Determinants for Training. The core aim was to build a proof-of-concept task performance assessment tool that can predict how well an individual will perform and how much stress they will experience when placed in demanding combat casualty care situations and other high-pressure, patient-care-relevant environments. Rather than only measuring performance after the fact, the program emphasizes prediction: using measurable factors about the individual to anticipate performance outcomes under stress before or during training.

The research scope for this specific solicitation narrowed in on two determinants thought to influence performance in stressful medical scenarios: personality and emotional state. In this announcement, personality is defined broadly as the non-physical characteristics that distinguish one person from another, while emotional states are described as the subjective interpretations of complex internal states in response to a person, object, or situation, which then indirectly shape behavior. Applicants were expected to investigate how these two factors relate to performance and stress, and then use that understanding to support three practical capabilities: assessing overall performance and stress levels during combat casualty care scenarios, breaking down (or deconstructing) performance into separate personality-driven and emotional-state-driven components, and recombining those components into a model that can predict overall task performance on known tasks, particularly when conditions are stressful.

A key feature of the program is its intended user population. The primary focus is on individuals preparing to become military combat medics, corpsmen, pararescuemen, or special operations combat medics, although the government allowed that other nearly equivalent populations could be considered if properly justified. The pilot effort was expected to compare participant performance against existing military entry standards for the relevant role whenever possible. If a team could not use an official entry standard, they were expected to propose an alternative benchmark that is as comparable as possible and justify it clearly, ideally with data showing how outcomes differ for people trained to a standard versus those who are not. Beyond initial selection and prediction, the solicitation also noted that the resulting assessment tools might later support sustainment and refresher training by tracking task performance and stress over time.

From a study design perspective, the opportunity emphasized methodological clarity and control. Applicants needed to clearly define the tasks being assessed, explain and define task difficulty, and provide evaluation criteria along with descriptions of the measurement instruments used. Importantly, task difficulty and conditions were expected to be held constant within the proposed project so that differences in performance could be more credibly attributed to the individual determinants under study (personality and emotional state), rather than shifting scenario complexity or inconsistent testing environments. The anticipated integration approach was practical and incremental: components would be brought together for initial, laboratory-based testing to see how well the combined system functions as a coherent assessment and prediction tool.

Overall, the program frames task performance as the visible end result of interacting determinants at a specific time and place: personality, emotional state, and task difficulty. PREEMPT’s larger goal is to identify which personality and emotional-state factors meaningfully drive performance under stress, and then use those insights to improve how the military selects individuals for specific medical tasks and environments, and how it designs training to boost performance across different scenarios. In funding terms, the opportunity was listed under CFDA 12.420 (military medical research and development-related), open eligibility (unrestricted), and offered multiple award instruments (cooperative agreement, grant, or procurement contract). The posted dates indicate it was created and posted on March 28, 2016, with an application closing date of August 29, 2016, and an award ceiling listed at $1,250,000.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the name of this funding opportunity?

This opportunity was a Department of Defense (DoD) Medical Simulation and Information Sciences funding solicitation identified as W81XWH-16-R-MSI1. It centered on a project called PREEMPT, short for Predictive Personality and Emotional State Performance Determinants for Training.

Which organization offered the opportunity?

The opportunity was offered by the Department of Defense through DOD-AMRAA.

What is PREEMPT trying to accomplish?

PREEMPT aimed to build a proof-of-concept task performance assessment tool designed to predict (not just measure after the fact) how well an individual will perform and how much stress they will experience in demanding combat casualty care situations and other high-pressure, patient-care-relevant environments.

How is this program different from typical performance assessment approaches?

Instead of only evaluating performance after training events, the program emphasized prediction by using measurable factors about an individual to anticipate performance outcomes under stress before or during training.

What determinants were the focus of this specific solicitation?

The research scope narrowed to two determinants believed to influence performance in stressful medical scenarios: personality and emotional state.

How does the solicitation define "personality"?

In this announcement, personality was defined broadly as the non-physical characteristics that distinguish one person from another.

How does the solicitation describe "emotional state"?

Emotional states were described as subjective interpretations of complex internal states in response to a person, object, or situation, which then indirectly shape behavior.

What were applicants expected to study about personality and emotional state?

Applicants were expected to investigate how personality and emotional state relate to performance and stress in demanding medical scenarios, and to use that understanding to support assessment and prediction capabilities within the PREEMPT concept.

What practical capabilities was the resulting tool expected to support?

The solicitation described three practical capabilities: (1) assessing overall performance and stress levels during combat casualty care scenarios, (2) deconstructing performance into separate personality-driven and emotional-state-driven components, and (3) recombining those components into a model that can predict overall task performance on known tasks, particularly when conditions are stressful.

Who was the primary intended user population?

The primary focus was on individuals preparing to become military combat medics, corpsmen, pararescuemen, or special operations combat medics.

Could applicants propose a different population to study?

Yes. The government indicated that other nearly equivalent populations could be considered if the choice was properly justified.

Was the project expected to compare performance to military entry standards?

Yes. The pilot effort was expected to compare participant performance against existing military entry standards for the relevant role whenever possible.

What if a team could not use an official military entry standard?

If an official entry standard could not be used, teams were expected to propose an alternative benchmark that was as comparable as possible and justify it clearly. The solicitation also indicated that justification would ideally include data showing how outcomes differ for people trained to a standard versus those who are not.

Did the solicitation mention any longer-term uses beyond initial selection and prediction?

Yes. It noted that the assessment tools might later support sustainment and refresher training by tracking task performance and stress over time.

What study design expectations were highlighted?

The opportunity emphasized methodological clarity and control. Applicants were expected to clearly define the tasks being assessed, explain and define task difficulty, and provide evaluation criteria along with descriptions of measurement instruments used.

Why was holding task difficulty and conditions constant important?

The solicitation expected task difficulty and conditions to be held constant within the proposed project so that differences in performance could be more credibly attributed to the individual determinants under study (personality and emotional state), rather than changing scenario complexity or inconsistent testing environments.

What integration approach was anticipated for the proof-of-concept?

The integration approach was described as practical and incremental, with components brought together for initial, laboratory-based testing to evaluate how well the combined system functioned as a coherent assessment and prediction tool.

How does the program frame task performance conceptually?

The program framed task performance as the visible end result of interacting determinants at a specific time and place, specifically personality, emotional state, and task difficulty.

What larger goal did PREEMPT emphasize for the military?

PREEMPT aimed to identify which personality and emotional-state factors meaningfully drive performance under stress and use those insights to improve how the military selects individuals for specific medical tasks and environments and how it designs training to boost performance across scenarios.

What CFDA number was associated with this opportunity?

The opportunity was listed under CFDA 12.420, described as military medical research and development-related.

Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was listed as open (unrestricted).

What award instruments were offered?

The opportunity offered multiple award instruments: a cooperative agreement, grant, or procurement contract.

What were the key posted dates for the opportunity?

The opportunity was created and posted on March 28, 2016. The application closing date was August 29, 2016.

What was the maximum award amount listed?

The award ceiling listed for the opportunity was $1,250,000.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: DOD-AMRAA

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development

Next opportunity: NeuroNEXT Clinical Trials (U01)

Previous opportunity: National Park Service: An assessment of informal trails and visitor created sites in Rocky Mountain National Park

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for W81XWH 16 R MSI1

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (W81XWH 16 R MSI1) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement Program Track-1: Apply for 16 557

Funding Number: 16 557
Agency: NSF
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $28,000,000
Tectonics Apply for 16 556

Funding Number: 16 556
Agency: NSF
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $500,000
Notice of Intent to Award Apply for USGS FA 16 0099

Funding Number: USGS FA 16 0099
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $66,752
Assessment of Larval Silver Carp Predator-prey Dynamic and Habitat Associations Apply for USGS FA 16 0098

Funding Number: USGS FA 16 0098
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $20,222
Targeted Neuroplasticity Training (TNT) Apply for DARPA BAA 16 24

Funding Number: DARPA BAA 16 24
Agency: DOD-DARPA-BTO
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Rivers CESU Apply for G16AS00048

Funding Number: G16AS00048
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $26,500
Sustainable Ammonia Synthesis Apply for DE FOA 0001569

Funding Number: DE FOA 0001569
Agency: PAMS-SC
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $600,000
Health Information Technologies and Informatics Hands-Free Apply for W81XWH 16 R MSI4

Funding Number: W81XWH 16 R MSI4
Agency: DOD-AMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $2,000,000
Health Information Technologies and Informatics Apply for W81XWH 16 R MSI3

Funding Number: W81XWH 16 R MSI3
Agency: DOD-AMRAA
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $2,000,000
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Gulf Coast CESU Apply for G16AS00047

Funding Number: G16AS00047
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $158,885
Notice of Intent to Award - Nutrient Runoff/Soil and Crop Condition, Black Creek Watershed Apply for USGS FA 16 0109

Funding Number: USGS FA 16 0109
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $31,500
Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program Apply for HHS 2016 ACL CIP ATTF 0164

Funding Number: HHS 2016 ACL CIP ATTF 0164
Agency: HHS-ACL
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $700,000
Small Spacecraft Technology Program Smallsat Technology Partnerships Appendix Apply for NNH16ZOA001N 16STP E1

Funding Number: NNH16ZOA001N 16STP E1
Agency: NASA-HQ
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for G16AS00053

Funding Number: G16AS00053
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $25,000
ROSES 2016: Planetary Data Archiving, Restoration, and Tools Apply for NNH16ZDA001N PDART

Funding Number: NNH16ZDA001N PDART
Agency: NASA-HQ
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Californian CESU Apply for G16AS00050

Funding Number: G16AS00050
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $21,312
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU Apply for G16AS00052

Funding Number: G16AS00052
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $40,998
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Great Lakes Northern Forests CESU Apply for G16AS00051

Funding Number: G16AS00051
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $6,051
NOI - GAP ANALYSIS PROGRAM - FRAMEWORK FOR PAD SUPPORT Apply for USGS 16 FA 6405

Funding Number: USGS 16 FA 6405
Agency: DOI-USGS1
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $75,000
ROSES 2016: Astrophysics Theory Program Apply for NNH16ZDA001N ATP

Funding Number: NNH16ZDA001N ATP
Agency: NASA-HQ
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "W81XWH 16 R MSI1", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.