Recovery Act Implement Boise Travel Plan Utilizing Youth Groups | Apply Online

FAQs: Recovery Act - Implement Boise Travel Plan Utilizing Youth Groups (BLM ID RFA 09 1600)

1) What is the title of this grant opportunity?

The opportunity is titled "Recovery Act - Implement Boise Travel Plan Utilizing Youth Groups."

2) What is the Funding Opportunity Number?

The Funding Opportunity Number is BLM ID RFA 09 1600.

3) Which federal agency offered this funding?

This was a U.S. Department of the Interior opportunity administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

4) What type of funding opportunity was it?

It was a discretionary funding announcement issued under the Recovery Act.

5) What was the main purpose of the grant?

The purpose was to support on-the-ground conservation and land management work in the BLM Boise District by implementing actions aligned with travel management decisions, while incorporating youth groups as part of the implementation approach.

6) Where would the funded work take place?

The work was intended for the BLM Boise District, specifically within areas covered by the Murphy and Wilson Travel Management Plans.

7) Which travel management plans were referenced?

The opportunity specifically referenced the Murphy and Wilson Travel Management Plans.

8) What activities were included in the project scope?

The scope focused on rehabilitating approximately five acres of hillside areas and completing fence modifications within the designated plan areas.

9) How many acres of hillside rehabilitation were anticipated?

Approximately five acres of hillside areas were expected to be rehabilitated.

10) What does "hillside rehabilitation" generally mean in this context?

In practical terms, hillside rehabilitation typically involves repairing and stabilizing disturbed or eroding slopes, reestablishing vegetation, and reducing resource damage linked to travel impacts such as off-highway vehicle use or unofficial route creation.

11) What were "fence modifications" expected to accomplish?

Fence modifications generally aim to improve management outcomes, such as protecting restoration sites, directing or restricting access, reducing conflicts among users, and supporting wildlife and livestock management objectives.

12) How did the grant connect to travel management decisions?

By tying the work to the Murphy and Wilson Travel Management Plans, the project emphasized compliance with established route networks and implementation of mitigation actions intended to protect soils, vegetation, wildlife habitat, and other public-land resources.

13) What funding instrument was used (grant vs. cooperative agreement)?

Funding was offered through a cooperative agreement.

14) What does it mean that the award was a cooperative agreement?

A cooperative agreement typically indicates that BLM expected substantial involvement in the project, rather than issuing a pass-through award with minimal agency participation.

15) How many awards were expected?

The announcement anticipated a single award.

16) What was the estimated total funding amount?

The estimated total funding amount was $25,000.

17) What was the award ceiling?

The award ceiling was $25,000.

18) What was the award floor?

The award floor was $0.

19) Was cost sharing or matching required?

No. There was no cost sharing or matching requirement, meaning applicants were not required to provide cash or in-kind match as a condition of receiving funds.

20) What CFDA program was this associated with?

This opportunity was associated with CFDA 15.231, Fish, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Resource Management.

21) Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was listed as unrestricted, meaning it was open to any type of entity, subject to any additional eligibility language that may have been included in the full announcement on Grants.gov.

22) When was the opportunity posted?

The posting date was August 31, 2009 (the creation date was also August 31, 2009).

23) What was the application deadline?

The original and current closing date was September 7, 2009.

24) How long was the application window?

Based on the dates provided, the application window ran from August 31, 2009 to September 7, 2009.

25) Is this opportunity still open?

No. The opportunity was later archived on October 4, 2009.

26) Where were applicants directed to find full details and instructions?

Applicants were directed to the full announcement on Grants.gov for complete details and instructions.

27) Who was the point of contact for access issues?

The point of contact listed for access issues was Christine K. Shaver (cshaver@blm.gov).

28) What was distinctive about this project compared to broader conservation grants?

It was described as a small, targeted Recovery Act project focused on translating travel management planning into on-the-ground improvements in the Boise District, combining restoration work (hillside rehabilitation) with practical infrastructure changes (fence modifications), and leveraging youth groups to help accomplish those tasks.