Opportunity Information: Apply for PD 11 7374
Apply for PD 11 7374
- The National Science Foundation in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Systematics and Biodiversity Science" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 47.074 Biological Sciences.
- This funding opportunity was created on Mar 11, 2011 and posted on Mar 9, 2011.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 9, 2011 Full Proposal Deadline(s) July 9, Annually January 9, Annually. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $22,813,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 26 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The National Science Foundation (NSF) Systematics and Biodiversity Science (SBS) opportunity is a discretionary grant program within the Biological Sciences directorate that funds research aimed at improving what we know about the diversity of life, how organisms are classified, and how they are evolutionarily related. The central focus is organismal biodiversity in natural systems, framed by big questions such as: what organisms exist, how they are related across the tree of life, how evolutionary processes produced modern global biodiversity patterns across time and space, and how phylogenetic history can be used to interpret evolution in the natural world. NSF places particular emphasis on projects that are transformative, meaning they do more than add incremental knowledge; they introduce approaches, syntheses, datasets, or analytical strategies that significantly change how biodiversity is discovered, documented, and interpreted.
A defining feature of SBS is its preference for integrative systematics, both in research design and in training. Competitive projects typically connect multiple parts of the biodiversity pipeline rather than treating them as separate tasks. That includes combining biodiversity discovery and field or collection-based work with rigorous taxonomy, phylogenetic inference, comparative analyses, and explicit evolutionary interpretation. The program also values training outcomes that produce researchers capable of working across these components, such as students or early-career scientists who can move from collecting and vouchering specimens to building phylogenies, revising classifications, and making results broadly reusable through open data resources.
SBS is organized around two core programs that applicants must choose between when submitting: Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis, and Phylogenetic Systematics. There is also a special proposal category called Advancing Revisionary Taxonomy and Systematics, which has specific requirements referenced in NSF Dear Colleague Letter NSF 11-037, but proposals are still submitted through one of the two core programs. In practice, this means applicants should align their narrative, methods, and deliverables with the expectations of the program that best matches the project’s primary goals, while still showing integration when appropriate.
The Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis program supports expeditionary and exploratory biodiversity research intended to accelerate discovery, identification, description, classification, and cataloguing of species and other organismal diversity. Projects can focus on any group of organisms in any natural habitat, but they should be framed at the organismal level and within an evolutionary context. NSF highlights three common organizing approaches: clade-based inventories (species-level inventories for a particular taxonomic group across a region up to planetary scales), guild-based studies (organized around ecological assemblages, shared habitats, or host-symbiont systems), and geographically based efforts (focused on a specific place). A strong proposal in this track makes a convincing case that the targeted clade, guild, or area is poorly known at the species level and that the proposed work will materially close that gap. Suitable activities include fieldwork, research using existing museum or herbarium collections, taxonomic identification, revisionary classification and monographs, hypothesis testing tied to discovery efforts, and bioinformatics that enables discovery and synthesis. NSF also encourages innovative workflows such as rapid identification and description, cybertaxonomy, and automated identification tools.
Because discovery-oriented projects can generate large volumes of specimens and data, Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis proposals are expected to include detailed, practical plans for execution and long-term value. This includes fieldwork coordination and permitting, vouchering of new collections, specimen preparation, and long-term storage arrangements that are openly accessible. Proposals should also cover specimen identification and description workflows, georeferencing, data modeling and databasing, and rapid dissemination of outputs into public biodiversity databases. In other words, the work is not just about collecting or naming; it is about building an enduring, well-curated, widely usable biodiversity resource with transparent methods and accessible products.
The Phylogenetic Systematics program supports research that uses phylogenetic approaches to answer major questions about organismal evolution and to resolve relationships among species and higher taxa across the hierarchy of life. This program includes tree-building projects at any taxonomic scale, tree-based analyses of character evolution, and tree-enabled comparative biology. Examples of appropriate topics include phylogenetic studies of biogeography, timing and tempo of diversification, evolution of morphological, physiological, developmental, behavioral, or molecular traits, adaptation, and other macroevolutionary patterns. Projects that use phylogenies to produce revisionary classifications and monographs are also within scope, and NSF explicitly welcomes proposals that develop or advance phylogenetic theory, analytical methods, or comparative approaches, as long as they are clearly motivated and broadly useful.
Phylogenetic Systematics proposals are expected to be methodologically explicit and well-justified in terms of sampling and analytical strategy. Applicants should clearly explain the phylogenetic methods to be used, why the chosen taxa are the right system for the question, and how data will be sampled (for example, taxon coverage, character or sequence sampling, and how missing data or uncertainty will be handled). If comparative methods are used, they should be justified and described in a way that shows the applicant understands assumptions and limitations. For proposals centered mainly on comparative biology, NSF expects a sufficient phylogeny component to ensure the tree used is strongly supported and appropriate for the proposed inferences. That may mean generating new phylogenetic data, or substantially improving and expanding existing published trees, including sampling that matches the scope of the biological question.
Both programs share similar expectations when fieldwork or new specimen collection is involved. Applicants should address permitting, coordination, vouchering, preparation, long-term specimen storage in accessible repositories, identifications and descriptions, georeferencing, data management, and rapid public release of data into biodiversity databases. This emphasis reflects NSF’s interest in making SBS-funded work durable and broadly reusable, not only through publications but through specimens, curated collections, and discoverable datasets.
NSF also notes that organismal biodiversity and evolution research is funded across multiple programs in the Biological Sciences Directorate, and SBS commonly co-reviews proposals with other clusters. Applicants are cautioned that some topics may fit better elsewhere, including projects focused primarily on demography or evolutionary processes below the species level, studies centered on genes and genomes without an organismal, phylogenetic, or comparative framing, form-and-function research that lacks a phylogenetic or organismal focus, or ecosystem-level functional diversity work. When a project sits near these boundaries, NSF encourages investigators to consult the BIO directorate program listings and contact a program officer to confirm the best fit before submission.
Administrative details in the opportunity listing indicate it is an NSF grant (CFDA 47.074, Biological Sciences) with no cost sharing requirement and unrestricted eligibility, meaning it is broadly open to applicant organizations, subject to any clarifications NSF provides in the full solicitation. The listing reported an estimated total funding level of $22,813,000 and an expected 26 awards. At the time of the posting (March 2011), the annual full proposal deadlines were set as July 9 and January 9 each year. The agency is the National Science Foundation, and logistical support for accessing the opportunity through Grants.gov is provided through NSF’s Grants.gov support contact.
NSF Systematics and Biodiversity Science (SBS) Grant - Frequently Asked Questions
1) What is the NSF Systematics and Biodiversity Science (SBS) program?
SBS is a discretionary grant program within the NSF Biological Sciences directorate that supports research to improve what we know about the diversity of life, how organisms are classified (systematics and taxonomy), and how they are evolutionarily related across the tree of life.
2) What kinds of research questions does SBS emphasize?
SBS centers on organismal biodiversity in natural systems and is framed by broad questions such as: what organisms exist, how they are related, how evolutionary processes generated modern biodiversity patterns across time and space, and how phylogenetic history can be used to interpret evolution in the natural world.
3) What does NSF mean by "transformative" in SBS?
NSF places particular emphasis on projects that go beyond incremental advances. A transformative SBS project introduces approaches, syntheses, datasets, or analytical strategies that significantly change how biodiversity is discovered, documented, and interpreted.
4) What is "integrative systematics" and why does SBS prefer it?
SBS prefers integrative systematics in both research design and training. Competitive projects often connect multiple parts of the biodiversity pipeline (for example, discovery and collecting plus taxonomy plus phylogenetic inference plus comparative analysis plus evolutionary interpretation) rather than treating these as separate, disconnected tasks.
5) How does SBS view training and workforce development?
The program values training outcomes that produce researchers able to work across the biodiversity pipeline. Examples include students or early-career scientists who can collect and voucher specimens, build phylogenies, revise classifications, and make results broadly reusable through open data resources.
6) What are the two core SBS programs an applicant must choose between?
Applicants must submit to one of two core programs: (1) Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis, or (2) Phylogenetic Systematics. Proposals should align their narrative, methods, and deliverables with the chosen program's expectations.
7) Is there a special SBS proposal category for revisionary taxonomy?
Yes. SBS includes a special proposal category called Advancing Revisionary Taxonomy and Systematics, with specific requirements referenced in NSF Dear Colleague Letter NSF 11-037. Even for this category, proposals are still submitted through one of the two core programs.
8) What does the Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis program support?
This program supports expeditionary and exploratory biodiversity research intended to accelerate discovery, identification, description, classification, and cataloguing of species and other organismal diversity. Projects can focus on any group of organisms in any natural habitat, but should be framed at the organismal level and within an evolutionary context.
9) What are common organizing approaches for Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis projects?
NSF highlights three common approaches: (1) clade-based inventories (species-level inventories for a taxonomic group across a region up to planetary scales), (2) guild-based studies (ecological assemblages, shared habitats, or host-symbiont systems), and (3) geographically based efforts (focused on a specific place).
10) What makes a strong Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis proposal?
A strong proposal makes a convincing case that the targeted clade, guild, or area is poorly known at the species level and that the proposed work will materially close that gap. It also demonstrates practical, detailed plans to generate enduring, curated, widely usable biodiversity resources.
11) What activities are considered suitable in Biodiversity Discovery and Analysis?
Suitable activities include fieldwork, research using existing museum or herbarium collections, taxonomic identification, revisionary classification and monographs, hypothesis testing tied to discovery efforts, and bioinformatics that enables discovery and synthesis. NSF also encourages innovative workflows such as rapid identification and description, cybertaxonomy, and automated identification tools.
12) What planning details are expected for discovery-oriented projects that generate many specimens or data?
Proposals are expected to include detailed, practical plans covering fieldwork coordination and permitting, vouchering of new collections, specimen preparation, and long-term storage arrangements that are openly accessible. They should also address identification and description workflows, georeferencing, data modeling and databasing, and rapid dissemination of outputs into public biodiversity databases.
13) What does the Phylogenetic Systematics program support?
This program supports research that uses phylogenetic approaches to resolve relationships among species and higher taxa and to answer major questions about organismal evolution. It includes tree-building projects at any taxonomic scale, tree-based analyses of character evolution, and tree-enabled comparative biology.
14) What are examples of topics that fit within Phylogenetic Systematics?
Examples include phylogenetic studies of biogeography, timing and tempo of diversification, evolution of morphological, physiological, developmental, behavioral, or molecular traits, adaptation, and other macroevolutionary patterns. Projects using phylogenies to produce revisionary classifications and monographs are also within scope.
15) Does Phylogenetic Systematics support theory or methods development?
Yes. NSF welcomes proposals that develop or advance phylogenetic theory, analytical methods, or comparative approaches, as long as they are clearly motivated and broadly useful.
16) What level of methodological detail is expected for Phylogenetic Systematics proposals?
Proposals are expected to be methodologically explicit and well-justified. Applicants should explain the phylogenetic methods to be used, why the chosen taxa are appropriate for the question, how data will be sampled (taxon coverage and character/sequence sampling), and how missing data or uncertainty will be handled.
17) What if a proposal is mainly about comparative biology rather than building a tree?
For proposals centered mainly on comparative biology, NSF expects a sufficient phylogeny component to ensure the tree used is strongly supported and appropriate for the intended inferences. This may require generating new phylogenetic data or substantially improving and expanding existing published trees, including sampling that matches the biological question.
18) What specimen and data expectations apply across both SBS programs when fieldwork or new collecting is involved?
Both programs share expectations for permitting and coordination, vouchering, specimen preparation, long-term storage in accessible repositories, identifications and descriptions, georeferencing, data management, and rapid public release of data into biodiversity databases. NSF emphasizes durable and broadly reusable outputs, including specimens, curated collections, and discoverable datasets.
19) Are SBS proposals ever co-reviewed with other NSF BIO programs?
Yes. NSF notes that organismal biodiversity and evolution research is funded across multiple programs in the Biological Sciences Directorate, and SBS commonly co-reviews proposals with other clusters.
20) What types of projects might fit better outside SBS?
NSF cautions that some topics may be better aligned elsewhere, including projects focused primarily on demography or evolutionary processes below the species level; studies centered on genes and genomes without an organismal, phylogenetic, or comparative framing; form-and-function research that lacks a phylogenetic or organismal focus; or ecosystem-level functional diversity work.
21) What should investigators do if they are unsure whether SBS is the best fit?
When a project sits near program boundaries, NSF encourages investigators to consult the BIO directorate program listings and contact a program officer to confirm the best fit before submission.
22) What agency sponsors this opportunity and what is the CFDA number?
The sponsoring agency is the National Science Foundation (NSF). The listing identifies CFDA 47.074 (Biological Sciences).
23) Is cost sharing required for this SBS opportunity?
No cost sharing requirement is indicated in the opportunity listing.
24) Who is eligible to apply?
The listing indicates unrestricted eligibility, meaning it is broadly open to applicant organizations, subject to any clarifications NSF provides in the full solicitation.
25) What is the estimated total funding and expected number of awards?
The listing reported an estimated total funding level of $22,813,000 and an expected 26 awards.
26) What were the full proposal deadlines listed for SBS at the time of posting?
At the time of the posting (March 2011), the annual full proposal deadlines were listed as July 9 and January 9 each year.
27) Where do applicants get logistical help for accessing the opportunity through Grants.gov?
The opportunity listing notes that logistical support for accessing the opportunity through Grants.gov is provided through NSF's Grants.gov support contact.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: Cooperative Agreement for a Prescriber s Clinical Support System for the Appropriate Use of Opioids in the Treatment of Pain and Opioid related Addiction
Previous opportunity: Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Field Initiated Projects CFDA Number 84.133G 2 (Development)
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for PD 11 7374
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (PD 11 7374) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Department of Defense Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) (previously referred to as Joint Service EOD) Apply for ONRBAA11 019 Funding Number: ONRBAA11 019 Agency: Office of Naval Research Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Advanced Fossil Energy Research Novel Developments in Sensors and Controls for Fossil Energy Power Generation and Fuel Production Technologies Apply for DE FOA 0000518 Funding Number: DE FOA 0000518 Agency: National Energy Technology Laboratory Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| EONS 2011 Summer 2011 Minority Student Education Forum Apply for NNH11ZHA002C MSEF Funding Number: NNH11ZHA002C MSEF Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| DoD FY11 Gulf War Illness Clinical Trial Award Apply for W81XWH 11 GWIRP CTA Funding Number: W81XWH 11 GWIRP CTA Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| DoD FY11 Gulf War Illness Innovative Treatment Evaluation Award Apply for W81XWH 11 GWIRP ITEA Funding Number: W81XWH 11 GWIRP ITEA Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| DoD FY11 Prostate Cancer Research Program Laboratory Clinical Transition Award Apply for W81XWH 11 PCRP LCTA Funding Number: W81XWH 11 PCRP LCTA Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| DoD Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial Award Rehabilitation Apply for W81XWH 11 SCIRP CTA R Funding Number: W81XWH 11 SCIRP CTA R Agency: Dept. of the Army USAMRAA Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| EarthCube: Apply for 16 514 Funding Number: 16 514 Agency: NSF Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Systems Biology Enabled Research on the Roles of Microbial Communities in Carbon Cycle Processes Apply for DE FOA 0001458 Funding Number: DE FOA 0001458 Agency: PAMS-SC Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $1,250,000 |
| Earth System Modeling Apply for DE FOA 0001482 Funding Number: DE FOA 0001482 Agency: PAMS-SC Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $350,000 |
| Condensed Matter and Materials Theory Apply for PD 09 1765 Funding Number: PD 09 1765 Agency: NSF Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2015: Land-Cover/Land-Use Change Apply for NNH15ZDA001N LCLUC Funding Number: NNH15ZDA001N LCLUC Agency: NASA-HQ Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes Apply for 16 519 Funding Number: 16 519 Agency: NSF Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| SBIR/STTR FY 2016 Phase II Release 1 Apply for DE FOA 0001405 Funding Number: DE FOA 0001405 Agency: PAMS-SC Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $1,510,000 |
| Engineering for Natural Hazards Apply for PD 16 014Y Funding Number: PD 16 014Y Agency: NSF Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development (DWPR) Fiscal Year 2016 Research Apply for R16 FOA DO 009 Funding Number: R16 FOA DO 009 Agency: DOI-BOR Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $150,000 |
| Service, Manufacturing and Operations Research Apply for PD 16 006Y Funding Number: PD 16 006Y Agency: NSF Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Medical Countermeasure Systems Broad Agency Announcement Apply for MCS BAA 15 01 Funding Number: MCS BAA 15 01 Agency: DOD-AMC-ACCAPGD Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Reverse Osmosis Concentrate Management through Halophyte Farming Apply for R16 NOI DO 006 Funding Number: R16 NOI DO 006 Agency: DOI-BOR Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $75,000 |
| Manufacturing Innovation Institutes Apply for RFI AFRL RQKM 2016 0009 Funding Number: RFI AFRL RQKM 2016 0009 Agency: DOD-AFRL Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "PD 11 7374", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
