The Prevention and Control of Unintentional Injury and Violence Prevention Through the World Health Organization | Apply Online

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1) What is the title of this grant opportunity?

The opportunity is titled "The Prevention and Control of Unintentional Injury and Violence Prevention Through the World Health Organization."

2) What is the Funding Opportunity Number (FON)?

The Funding Opportunity Number is CDC RFA CE16-1601.

3) Which agency is offering this funding?

This is a discretionary funding opportunity from HHS/CDC (the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

4) What funding mechanism is used?

The award is a cooperative agreement, which generally means the recipient should expect ongoing collaboration with CDC during the project period rather than a fully hands-off grant relationship.

5) What is the program’s CFDA number?

The CFDA number associated with this program is 93.136.

6) What is the overall purpose of the opportunity?

The purpose is to reduce the global burden of violence and unintentional injuries, with a particular emphasis on low- and middle-income countries, by strengthening surveillance and indicators, building prevention capacity, supporting implementation and evaluation of prevention strategies, and disseminating practical tools and knowledge.

7) Is the work domestic or international in scope?

The work is international in scope, with particular emphasis on low- and middle-income countries.

8) How does this opportunity connect to Healthy People 2020?

Even though the work is global, it is framed to support the Healthy People 2020 priority area focused on preventing injury and violence.

9) What kinds of public health problems does the grant focus on?

The focus is on violence and unintentional injuries, with an emphasis on prevention and control through stronger public health systems and partnerships.

10) What are the main program activities emphasized in the summary?

The summary emphasizes four major activity areas: (1) improving data, indicators, and monitoring/surveillance; (2) capacity building through training and education; (3) implementation and evaluation of comprehensive prevention strategies; and (4) dissemination of tools, resources, and expertise, along with partnership development.

11) Why is surveillance and monitoring such a central focus?

Because clear, comparable data is treated as foundational for identifying the biggest injury and violence problems, targeting interventions, tracking trends over time, and evaluating whether prevention strategies are working.

12) What does “improving data and monitoring” include?

It includes supporting the development and use of indicators and surveillance systems, helping establish or strengthen reporting systems, improving the quality and consistency of injury and violence data, and making sure the information collected is useful for decision-making.

13) What is meant by “indicators” in this opportunity?

Indicators refer to measurable metrics used to reliably measure injuries and violence and track trends over time, supported through the development and use of surveillance systems.

14) What is meant by “surveillance systems” in this context?

Surveillance systems are the reporting and monitoring mechanisms used to collect and analyze injury and violence data in a consistent way over time so trends can be tracked and programs can be guided by evidence.

15) What types of capacity building does the opportunity support?

Capacity building includes training and education for professionals and institutions involved in injury and violence prevention, such as developing educational materials, conducting workshops, offering technical trainings, and building long-term expertise within public health systems and partner organizations.

16) Is the training expected to be one-time or long-term?

The intent is not just one-time training. The emphasis is on strengthening the ability of local and national partners to design, implement, and sustain prevention efforts over time.

17) What does the opportunity say about prevention strategies to be implemented?

It supports implementation and evaluation of comprehensive prevention strategies, emphasizing broader, coordinated approaches rather than isolated projects.

18) What does “comprehensive prevention strategies” imply here?

It points to coordinated, broader approaches to preventing and controlling injuries and violence, rather than a collection of unrelated or stand-alone activities.

19) Is evaluation required or optional?

Evaluation is positioned as a key requirement. The recipient is expected to assess effectiveness by defining measurable outcomes, monitoring implementation quality, and documenting results.

20) Why is evaluation emphasized?

Because evaluation helps translate prevention work into evidence that can guide policy, funding decisions, and program improvements, and supports adaptation or scaling of successful approaches.

21) What is meant by “dissemination” in this opportunity?

Dissemination is a central deliverable focused on spreading information, tools, and expertise that practitioners can use in real-world settings to support injury and violence prevention.

22) What kinds of dissemination products are mentioned?

Examples include guidance documents, toolkits, protocols, technical resources, and communication products that translate technical knowledge into practical steps.

23) Who is the intended audience for the disseminated tools and resources?

The materials are intended to be accessible and usable for practitioners and public health partners working on injury and violence prevention.

24) What role do partnerships play in this opportunity?

Partnership development is highlighted as part of the work. The recipient is expected to build and maintain relationships across stakeholders such as international bodies, government agencies, public health programs, and other organizations involved in injury and violence prevention.

25) How many awards were expected?

The opportunity anticipated a single award (Expected Awards: 1).

26) What was the posting date for the opportunity?

The posting date was February 22, 2016.

27) What was the creation date for the opportunity?

The creation date was February 22, 2016.

28) What was the application closing date?

The closing date was June 1, 2016.

29) Was an award ceiling listed?

The listing shows an award ceiling of 0, which typically indicates the ceiling was not specified in the public summary or depended on details described in the full announcement.

30) Who was eligible to apply based on the summary?

Eligibility is categorized as "Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification)," meaning the detailed eligibility rules were provided in the full funding announcement rather than in the brief summary.

31) Does the summary specify exactly which organizations qualify under “Others”?

No. The summary points to an "Additional Information on Eligibility" section in the full announcement for clarification, but those details are not included in the provided summary.

32) What practical outcomes is this program aiming to achieve?

The end goal is practical impact: stronger systems and partnerships that give practitioners and public health programs the data, skills, tools, and evidence needed to reduce injury and violence, especially in settings where the burden is high and prevention infrastructure may be limited.