Aircraft Drag Reduction Program | Apply Online

Aircraft Drag Reduction Program (AFRL) - Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the Aircraft Drag Reduction Program?

The Aircraft Drag Reduction Program was an Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) research and development opportunity focused on cutting aircraft fuel burn by reducing aerodynamic drag. It targeted drag-reduction approaches that use engineered surfaces, materials, and coatings (often abbreviated as ESMC).

2. What problem was this program trying to solve?

The program aimed to reduce aircraft fuel burn by lowering aerodynamic drag. Since drag reduction can translate into meaningful fuel savings (especially at cruise), the goal was to mature technologies that could realistically be integrated onto operational aircraft.

3. What types of technologies were of interest?

The opportunity was broadly interested in any technology that could meaningfully reduce drag, with particular emphasis on engineered surfaces, materials, and coatings (ESMC) intended to reduce turbulent boundary layer skin-friction drag.

4. Why was skin-friction drag a major emphasis?

Skin-friction drag was highlighted because it is a major contributor to overall drag for many aircraft configurations, particularly at cruise conditions. The program therefore emphasized technologies that reduce turbulent boundary layer skin-friction drag.

5. What was the maturity goal for proposed concepts?

The central intent was to take promising drag-reduction concepts beyond early-stage research and advance them into more mature, flight-relevant solutions that could be transitioned to operational aircraft applications.

6. Was the program intended for legacy aircraft, future aircraft, or both?

Both. The program was designed to support solutions that could transition onto existing (legacy) aircraft as well as future platforms.

7. What testing and validation activities were contemplated?

The scope contemplated a progression of testing and validation that could include laboratory testing on small samples, wind tunnel testing at multiple scales, and flight testing. The intent was to move from controlled environments toward more realistic operational conditions.

8. What does "coupon" testing mean in this context?

Coupon testing refers to controlled laboratory studies performed on small material samples (coupons). These tests are used to measure drag-relevant performance characteristics and durability-related behavior before moving to larger-scale evaluations.

9. What kinds of wind tunnel testing were included?

The program allowed wind tunnel evaluations across a range of scales, from small-scale experiments through large-scale wind tunnel testing, to quantify drag reduction under more realistic flow conditions.

10. Was flight testing allowed or expected?

Flight testing was allowed. The program recognized that real-world operating environments and aircraft integration constraints can strongly affect performance, so flight testing was included as an option within the overall validation approach.

11. Why did the program consider real-world operating conditions important?

The opportunity explicitly recognized that factors like surface contamination, wear, and aircraft-level integration constraints can significantly affect drag-reduction performance when compared to controlled laboratory or wind tunnel settings.

12. Beyond drag reduction, what else did the program support?

In addition to demonstrating drag reduction, the program supported maturing and transitioning the technology to aircraft applications. This included activities associated with qualification testing for new coatings, materials, or engineered surface treatments.

13. What is meant by "qualification testing" in this opportunity?

Qualification testing, as described in the opportunity, typically involves verifying performance consistency and checking characteristics important for aircraft use such as environmental resistance, adhesion, maintainability, and compatibility with aircraft operations.

14. What award instruments were anticipated?

This was described as a discretionary government grant-style opportunity that could be awarded either as a cooperative agreement or a procurement contract.

15. What is the difference between a cooperative agreement and a procurement contract in this context?

Based on the description provided, the program structure reflected that the government expected active involvement and/or deliverable-focused development typical of applied defense research and development. The opportunity allowed for either cooperative agreement or procurement contract arrangements.

16. What was the funding activity category?

The funding activity category was Science and Technology and other Research and Development.

17. What CFDA number was associated with this opportunity?

The opportunity was tied to CFDA 12.800, the Air Force Defense Research Sciences Program.

18. How many awards were anticipated?

AFRL anticipated making a single award.

19. What was the estimated total funding level?

The estimated total funding level was $8,750,000.

20. Was cost sharing or matching required?

No. The opportunity did not require cost sharing or matching.

21. Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was listed as unrestricted, meaning a wide range of applicants could compete (such as companies, universities, nonprofits, or other entities), subject to any additional eligibility clarifications in the full announcement.

22. When was the opportunity posted?

The opportunity was posted on September 11, 2014.

23. What were the application closing dates?

The original closing date and the final closing date were both October 27, 2014.

24. Is this opportunity still open?

No. The opportunity was archived on November 11, 2014.

25. Who was the point of contact for access issues and assistance?

The contracting point of contact listed for access issues and assistance was Steven Brumfield, Contracting Officer, reachable at 937-713-9934.