Opportunity Information: Apply for RFA DP09 91201SUPP10

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the health sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009Supplemental Funding to Support Enhanced Evaluation within ARRA Funded Obesity Communities" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 93.724 ARRA Prevention and Wellness Communities Putting Prevention to Work Funding Opportunities Announcement (FOA).
  • This funding opportunity was created on Jul 20, 2010 and posted on Jul 20, 2010.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Aug 20, 2010. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $10,000,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $2,000,000.00 in funding.
  • The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 6 candidate(s).
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • Eligibility is limited to current CPPW grantees who are implementing the nutritional and physical activity MAPPS strategies that are expected to drive changes in height and weight (to calculate BMI) and, where applicable, other biometric and related measurements and observational measures such as data on physical activity and/or nutrition/dietary intake under DP09 912 ARRA09 and that have the necessary infrastructure in place and experience to perform the measurement activities required, and have some degree of height and weight and, where applicable, other biometric or related measurement activities currently ongoing in their community.. Competition is limited to the 25 CPPW grantee communities funded through cooperative agreement DP09 912ARRA09 for obesity prevention as follows Boston Public Health Commission, Massachusetts Cherokee Nation Health Service Group, Oklahoma Cook County (Cook County Department of Public Health/Public Health County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health, California County of San Diego Health Human Services Agency, California Douglas County Health Department, Nebraska Hamilton County General Health District, Ohio Hawaii State of Hawaii Department of Health (Kauai and Maui) Indiana Indiana State Department of Health (Bartholomew County and Vanderburgh County) Jefferson County Department of Health, Alabama Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Maine (Healthy Lakes and Portland) Miami Dade County Health Department, Florida Minnesota Minnesota Department of Health (Olmstead County and Minneapolis) Multnomah County Health Department, Oregon Nashville/Davidson County Metro Public Health Department, Tennessee New York City (Fund for Public Health in New York, Inc.), New York Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Pennsylvania Pima County, Arizona Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico San Antonio Metropolitan Health District, Texas Seattle King County Department of Public Health, Washington Tri County Health Department, Colorado West Virginia West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (Mid Ohio Valley) Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Health Services (LaCrosse County and Wood County)
Apply for RFA DP09 91201SUPP10

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

This grant opportunity, titled "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 Supplemental Funding to Support Enhanced Evaluation within ARRA Funded Obesity Communities" (Funding Opportunity Number RFA DP09 91201SUPP10), was a CDC discretionary funding announcement designed to strengthen evaluation activities in communities already funded for obesity prevention under the Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) initiative. The central goal was not to start new obesity prevention programs, but to add resources so existing CPPW sites could collect better, more consistent individual-level measurement data and pair that data with stronger documentation of local policy and environmental changes tied to nutrition and physical activity.

The focus of the supplemental funding was expanding the collection and evaluation of individual-level height and weight data so communities could calculate body mass index (BMI) and more clearly assess whether their interventions were associated with measurable changes in obesity-related outcomes. Where applicable, CDC also encouraged collecting other biometric and related measures beyond height and weight, depending on what was feasible and already underway in the community. The intent was to improve the quality and usefulness of evaluation data in places already implementing obesity prevention strategies, particularly those expected to influence weight-related outcomes over time.

A major feature of the opportunity was the expectation that awardees would also add or expand observational measures that capture policy or environmental changes, so evaluation would not rely on individual measurements alone. In practice, this means supplementing BMI and biometric information with structured ways to observe and document changes in the community context, such as modifications to food environments, physical activity supports, institutional policies, or other built-environment conditions. The announcement specifically referenced observational measures related to policy and environmental change and also noted examples such as data tied to physical activity and/or nutrition or dietary intake. The underlying idea was to connect changes in local systems and environments to changes in individual outcomes, creating a more complete picture of what interventions were implemented and how they may have influenced health.

Eligibility was narrowly limited. Only current CPPW grantees funded through cooperative agreement DP09 912ARRA09 could apply, and even among those grantees, applicants needed to be implementing the nutrition and physical activity MAPPS strategies (a set of approaches commonly framed as Media, Access, Point of decision information, Price, and Social support/services) that were expected to drive changes in height and weight or related measures. Applicants also had to demonstrate that they already had the infrastructure and experience to perform the required measurement activities and that they had at least some measurement work already ongoing in their community. In other words, this was not meant for communities starting from scratch; it was meant to scale up and strengthen evaluation capacity where measurement systems were already in place.

Competition was confined to the 25 named CPPW grantee communities funded for obesity prevention under the ARRA-supported cooperative agreement. These included large city and county health departments as well as state and tribal entities, such as Boston Public Health Commission (MA); Cherokee Nation Health Service Group (OK); Cook County Department of Public Health (IL); Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (CA); San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (CA); Douglas County Health Department (NE); Hamilton County General Health District (OH); the State of Hawaii Department of Health (Kauai and Maui); Indiana State Department of Health (Bartholomew and Vanderburgh Counties); Jefferson County Department of Health (AL); Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (KY); Maine Department of Health and Human Services (Healthy Lakes and Portland); Miami-Dade County Health Department (FL); Minnesota Department of Health (Olmstead County and Minneapolis); Multnomah County Health Department (OR); Nashville/Davidson County Metro Public Health Department (TN); New York City (Fund for Public Health in New York, Inc.) (NY); Philadelphia Department of Public Health (PA); Pima County (AZ); Pueblo of Jemez (NM); San Antonio Metropolitan Health District (TX); Seattle-King County Department of Public Health (WA); Tri-County Health Department (CO); West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (Mid-Ohio Valley); and Wisconsin Department of Health Services (LaCrosse and Wood Counties). This limitation reflects that the supplement was intended to enhance evaluation within an existing, time-limited ARRA investment rather than broaden CPPW to new jurisdictions.

In terms of funding details, CDC anticipated making about 6 awards, with an estimated total funding amount of $10,000,000. Individual awards could range from a floor of $50,000 up to a ceiling of $2,000,000, and there was no cost sharing or matching requirement. The program is associated with CFDA 93.724 under ARRA and the CPPW program area. The announcement was posted and created on July 20, 2010, with an original and current closing date of August 20, 2010, and it was later archived on September 19, 2010. The funding instrument type was listed as "Other," and the activity category was Health, consistent with CDC public health evaluation support.

For applicants needing assistance with the announcement, the listed contact was the CDC Procurement and Grants Office, reachable by phone at 770-488-2700 or by email at pgotim@cdc.gov. Overall, the opportunity can be summed up as a targeted ARRA-era supplement meant to help a small set of already-funded obesity prevention communities improve the rigor and breadth of their evaluation by increasing direct measurement of BMI-related outcomes and strengthening observational tracking of policy and environmental changes that could plausibly drive those outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the official title of this grant opportunity?

The opportunity is titled "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 Supplemental Funding to Support Enhanced Evaluation within ARRA Funded Obesity Communities."

2. What is the Funding Opportunity Number (FON)?

The Funding Opportunity Number is RFA DP09 91201SUPP10.

3. Which federal agency offered this funding opportunity?

This was a CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) discretionary funding announcement.

4. What was the purpose of this supplemental funding?

The purpose was to strengthen and enhance evaluation activities in communities that were already funded for obesity prevention under the Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) initiative, specifically those supported by ARRA funds.

5. Was this funding intended to start new obesity prevention programs?

No. The central goal was not to start new obesity prevention programs, but to add resources so existing CPPW sites could collect better and more consistent evaluation data and improve documentation of policy and environmental changes.

6. What kinds of data collection were emphasized?

The supplemental funding focused on expanding the collection and evaluation of individual-level height and weight data so communities could calculate BMI (body mass index) and better assess whether interventions were associated with measurable changes in obesity-related outcomes.

7. Why was BMI data a key focus?

By increasing the collection of individual-level height and weight measurements, communities could calculate BMI and more clearly evaluate whether obesity prevention strategies were linked to changes in weight-related outcomes over time.

8. Were applicants encouraged to collect measures beyond height and weight?

Yes. Where applicable, CDC encouraged collecting other biometric and related measures beyond height and weight, depending on what was feasible and already underway in the community.

9. Did the opportunity require evaluation beyond individual measurements?

Yes. A major feature was the expectation that awardees would add or expand observational measures that capture policy or environmental changes, so evaluation would not rely on individual measurements alone.

10. What are "observational measures" in this context?

Observational measures refer to structured ways to observe and document changes in the community context, such as changes to food environments, physical activity supports, institutional policies, or other built-environment conditions.

11. What kinds of community changes were intended to be documented?

The announcement referenced policy and environmental change measures and noted examples such as data tied to physical activity and/or nutrition or dietary intake, with the broader aim of linking local system/environment changes to individual outcomes.

12. How does this supplement relate to the CPPW initiative?

It was designed specifically to enhance evaluation within already-funded CPPW obesity prevention communities, improving measurement rigor and strengthening the connection between interventions, environmental or policy change, and outcomes.

13. Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was narrowly limited to current CPPW grantees funded through cooperative agreement DP09 912ARRA09.

14. Were all CPPW grantees eligible?

No. Applicants also needed to be implementing the nutrition and physical activity MAPPS strategies that were expected to drive changes in height and weight or related measures.

15. What are MAPPS strategies?

MAPPS refers to approaches commonly framed as Media, Access, Point of decision information, Price, and Social support/services. In this opportunity, MAPPS strategies needed to be those expected to influence height/weight or related measures.

16. Did applicants need to already have measurement activities underway?

Yes. Applicants had to demonstrate they already had infrastructure and experience to perform the required measurement activities and that at least some measurement work was already ongoing in the community.

17. Could a community "starting from scratch" apply for this supplement?

No. The supplement was intended to scale up and strengthen evaluation capacity where measurement systems were already in place, not to build brand-new measurement systems from the ground up.

18. How many communities could compete for this funding?

Competition was confined to 25 named CPPW grantee communities funded for obesity prevention under the ARRA-supported cooperative agreement.

19. Approximately how many awards did CDC anticipate making?

CDC anticipated making about 6 awards.

20. What was the estimated total funding amount?

The estimated total funding amount was $10,000,000.

21. What was the expected award size range?

Individual awards could range from a minimum (floor) of $50,000 up to a maximum (ceiling) of $2,000,000.

22. Was cost sharing or matching required?

No. There was no cost sharing or matching requirement.

23. What CFDA number is associated with this opportunity?

The opportunity is associated with CFDA 93.724 under ARRA and the CPPW program area.

24. What was the activity category for this opportunity?

The activity category was Health.

25. What was the funding instrument type?

The funding instrument type was listed as "Other."

26. When was the announcement posted?

The announcement was posted (and created) on July 20, 2010.

27. What was the application closing date?

The original and current closing date was August 20, 2010.

28. When was the opportunity archived?

The opportunity was later archived on September 19, 2010.

29. Why was eligibility limited to specific CPPW communities?

The limitation reflected that the supplement was intended to enhance evaluation within an existing, time-limited ARRA investment rather than broaden CPPW to new jurisdictions.

30. Which CPPW grantees were named as the eligible communities?

The 25 named communities/entities included: Boston Public Health Commission (MA); Cherokee Nation Health Service Group (OK); Cook County Department of Public Health (IL); Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (CA); San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (CA); Douglas County Health Department (NE); Hamilton County General Health District (OH); State of Hawaii Department of Health (Kauai and Maui); Indiana State Department of Health (Bartholomew and Vanderburgh Counties); Jefferson County Department of Health (AL); Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (KY); Maine Department of Health and Human Services (Healthy Lakes and Portland); Miami-Dade County Health Department (FL); Minnesota Department of Health (Olmstead County and Minneapolis); Multnomah County Health Department (OR); Nashville/Davidson County Metro Public Health Department (TN); New York City (Fund for Public Health in New York, Inc.) (NY); Philadelphia Department of Public Health (PA); Pima County (AZ); Pueblo of Jemez (NM); San Antonio Metropolitan Health District (TX); Seattle-King County Department of Public Health (WA); Tri-County Health Department (CO); West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (Mid-Ohio Valley); Wisconsin Department of Health Services (LaCrosse and Wood Counties).

31. What kind of applicants were represented among the eligible communities?

The eligible group included large city and county health departments as well as state and tribal entities.

32. What was the main evaluation improvement this funding was trying to achieve?

The goal was to improve the rigor, consistency, and usefulness of evaluation data by increasing direct individual measurement (BMI and potentially other biometrics) and strengthening observational tracking of policy and environmental changes related to nutrition and physical activity.

33. Who was listed as the contact for help with the announcement?

The listed contact was the CDC Procurement and Grants Office.

34. How could applicants contact the CDC Procurement and Grants Office?

They could be reached by phone at 770-488-2700 or by email at pgotim@cdc.gov.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Health

Next opportunity: National Park Service Improve Archives Accountability and Access for Colorado National Monument

Previous opportunity: National Park Service Catalog Archeology Project Archives for ten parks in the Intermountain Region

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for RFA DP09 91201SUPP10

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (RFA DP09 91201SUPP10) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
A Public Campaign to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance Apply for CDC RFA CI10 1008E

Funding Number: CDC RFA CI10 1008E
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $100,000
Fiscal Year 2010 Directed Source Award Apply for HHS 2010 ONC EV 001

Funding Number: HHS 2010 ONC EV 001
Agency: Office of the National Coordinator
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $400,000
Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers (OAICs) (P30) Apply for RFA AG 11 002

Funding Number: RFA AG 11 002
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $800,000
Affordable Care Act (ACA) Consumer Assistance Program Grants Apply for CA CAP 10 002

Funding Number: CA CAP 10 002
Agency: CMS Consumer Information Insurance Oversight
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $3,400,000
NCMHD Health Disparities Research (R01) Apply for RFA MD 11 001

Funding Number: RFA MD 11 001
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $250,000
FY11 Announcement of Anticipated Availability of Funds for Family Planning Services Grants (Alabama, North Carolina areas). Apply for PA FPH 11 001

Funding Number: PA FPH 11 001
Agency: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $7,135,343
Patient Care Coordination Demonstration Project Apply for RFA DP07 70301SUPP10

Funding Number: RFA DP07 70301SUPP10
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Most at Risk Population Prevention Program in Angola Apply for 674 10 00058

Funding Number: 674 10 00058
Agency: South Africa USAID Pretoria
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $5,600,000
Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Grant Demonstration Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act Section 2403 Apply for CMS 1LI 11 001

Funding Number: CMS 1LI 11 001
Agency: Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $22,500,000
FY11 Announcement of Anticipated Availability of Funds for Family Planning Services Grants (Florida, Greater Miami area). Apply for PA FPH 11 002

Funding Number: PA FPH 11 002
Agency: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $554,000
Genomics of Transplantation Cooperative Research Program (U01, U19) Apply for RFA AI 10 019

Funding Number: RFA AI 10 019
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Ancillary Studies to the ACCORD Clinical Trial or the ACCORD Follow on Study (R01) Apply for PAR 10 238

Funding Number: PAR 10 238
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Mind/Body Research Program (R01) Apply for RFA DP 10 010

Funding Number: RFA DP 10 010
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Directed Source Apply for RFA DD10 1018E

Funding Number: RFA DD10 1018E
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Minority AIDS Initiative ProjectTargeting Youth at Highest Risk for HIV, Other STD, and Teen PregnancyAmong Cooperative Agreement Recipients of RFA DP08 801 Improving Health and Educational Outcomes of Young People Apply for RFA DP08 80101SUPP10

Funding Number: RFA DP08 80101SUPP10
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Viral and Host Genetic Factors Regulating HIV Associated CNS Disease (R01) Apply for RFA MH 11 020

Funding Number: RFA MH 11 020
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Viral and Host Genetic Factors Regulating HIV Associated CNS Disease (R21) Apply for RFA MH 11 021

Funding Number: RFA MH 11 021
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $200,000
Biomedical Prevention of HIV Research Education (R25) Apply for RFA AI 10 027

Funding Number: RFA AI 10 027
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
State Planning and Establishment Grants for the Affordable Care Acts Exchanges Apply for IE HBE 10 001

Funding Number: IE HBE 10 001
Agency: CMS Consumer Information Insurance Oversight
Category: Health
Funding Amount: $1,000,000
Integrated Preclinical/Clinical Program for HIV Topical Microbicides (IPCP HTM) (U19) Apply for RFA AI 10 006

Funding Number: RFA AI 10 006
Agency: National Institutes of Health
Category: Health
Funding Amount: Case Dependent

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "RFA DP09 91201SUPP10", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.