Opportunity Information: Apply for 26CS06
Apply for 26CS06
- The National Institute of Corrections in the other sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Community Reentry Settings Initiative" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 16.602.
- This funding opportunity was created on 2026-03-05.
- Applicants must submit their applications by 2026-05-04. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $100,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Community Reentry Settings Initiative is a National Institute of Corrections (NIC) cooperative agreement focused on improving how prisons decide which residents are released to halfway houses and how that transition is managed. The central idea is that release decisions are not just administrative steps; they directly shape public safety outcomes and reentry success. NIC wants a close, systematic look at the real-world decision-making process that moves someone from a prison setting into a halfway house, with attention to whether decisions align with evidence-based Risk, Needs, and Responsivity (RNR) principles and broader community safety considerations.
A major emphasis of the opportunity is a process evaluation of current practice. NIC is looking for an applicant that can map and analyze how eligibility and placement decisions are actually made, not just how policies say they should be made. The work is meant to explore practical questions across the full decision chain: what criteria are used (risk assessments, protective factors, case history, and other indicators), how case managers plan with residents for halfway house placement, what the operational "hand-off" looks like between prison staff and halfway house providers, and how outside partners (employers, schools, community-based organizations, nonprofits, and other service systems) are engaged during the transition. It also asks what supports are realistically available during the halfway house period, such as employment help, life skills programming, mental health care, and substance use treatment, and whether there is a coherent continuum of care rather than fragmented services.
One of the core problems NIC wants examined is the tension between discretion and standardization. On paper, release to halfway houses is shaped by legal mandates, statutes, zoning requirements, timelines, and written procedures. In practice, the final decision often rests with people who have significant discretionary authority, such as wardens, community corrections managers, and case managers. Because individuals and units can interpret guidance differently, discretion can lead to variation in who is considered eligible, how criteria are weighted, and whether policies are applied consistently across teams or locations. NIC specifically highlights the risk that informal norms or unwritten rules may drive outcomes more than formal policy, and that subjective judgment can produce inconsistencies, deviations from program design, or uneven application of rules. The evaluation is intended to surface where those gaps occur and why, and to clarify the perceived trade-offs staff face between strict compliance and flexibility for individualized case management.
The end goal is practical improvement, not theory. NIC wants findings that illuminate operational realities and bottlenecks so decision points can be strengthened and placement implementation can be improved. By focusing on the "why" and "how" behind current practices, the initiative aims to identify actionable opportunities to make the release-to-halfway-house pipeline more consistent, fair, evidence-informed, and supportive of successful reentry outcomes.
This is explicitly not funding to create, expand, renovate, staff, or operate a halfway house. It is funding for evaluation and examination of decision-making and transition processes connected to halfway house placement, with the intent of informing transformational changes in how systems use halfway houses as a reentry setting.
Administrative details: the opportunity is offered as a cooperative agreement (meaning NIC will likely have substantial involvement during the project). The funding opportunity number is 26CS06 under CFDA 16.602. NIC expects to make one award, with a ceiling of $100,000. The original closing date is May 4, 2026, and the opportunity was created on March 5, 2026.
Eligibility includes nonprofit organizations (including faith-based, community, and tribal organizations), for-profit organizations (including tribal for-profits), and institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions). For-profit recipients must waive any profit or fee for services. Foreign governments and international organizations are not eligible. Proof of 501(c)(3) status or an authorizing tribal resolution is required. Partnerships are allowed and encouraged, but one eligible entity must serve as the primary applicant and others must be included as subrecipients. Only one application may be submitted per organization.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): Community Reentry Settings Initiative (NIC)
What is the Community Reentry Settings Initiative?
The Community Reentry Settings Initiative is a National Institute of Corrections (NIC) cooperative agreement focused on improving how prisons decide which residents are released to halfway houses and how that transition is managed. The initiative treats release-to-halfway-house decisions as a public safety and reentry success issue, not just an administrative step.
What is NIC trying to improve through this initiative?
NIC is aiming for practical improvements in the real-world decision-making and transition process that moves a person from prison into a halfway house. The goal is to identify operational bottlenecks and decision points that can be strengthened so placements are more consistent, fair, evidence-informed, and supportive of successful reentry outcomes.
What type of work is funded under this opportunity?
This opportunity funds evaluation and examination of decision-making and transition processes connected to halfway house placement. A major emphasis is a process evaluation that maps and analyzes how eligibility and placement decisions are actually made in practice, not only how written policies describe the process.
Is this funding intended to operate or expand a halfway house?
No. This is explicitly not funding to create, expand, renovate, staff, or operate a halfway house. It is funding for evaluation and examination work intended to inform transformational changes in how systems use halfway houses as a reentry setting.
What parts of the release-to-halfway-house pipeline does NIC want examined?
NIC wants a close look across the full decision chain, including: the criteria used for eligibility and placement (such as risk assessments, protective factors, case history, and other indicators); how case managers plan with residents for halfway house placement; what the operational hand-off looks like between prison staff and halfway house providers; how outside partners are engaged during transition; and what supports are realistically available during the halfway house period.
What does NIC mean by a “process evaluation of current practice”?
It means documenting and analyzing what actually happens on the ground when release-to-halfway-house decisions are made, including how staff interpret policies, how criteria are weighed, and where informal norms or unwritten rules may shape outcomes. The intent is to surface gaps between policy and practice and explain why those gaps occur.
What decision criteria might be examined in this initiative?
Based on the opportunity description, NIC is interested in criteria such as risk assessments, protective factors, case history, and other indicators that influence eligibility and placement decisions, along with how those criteria are weighted and applied in practice.
What are RNR principles, and how are they relevant here?
NIC references evidence-based Risk, Needs, and Responsivity (RNR) principles as an important lens for examining whether release and placement decisions align with evidence-informed practices and broader community safety considerations.
Why is NIC focused on “discretion versus standardization”?
NIC highlights that, while formal rules (legal mandates, statutes, zoning requirements, timelines, and written procedures) shape halfway house release decisions on paper, the final decision often involves significant staff discretion (for example, wardens, community corrections managers, and case managers). Different interpretations and informal norms can lead to variation and inconsistency. The evaluation is intended to identify where these gaps occur, why they happen, and what trade-offs staff perceive between strict compliance and individualized flexibility.
What kinds of transition “hand-off” issues does NIC want explored?
NIC wants the applicant to examine what the operational hand-off looks like between prison staff and halfway house providers during placement and transition, including how coordination occurs in real practice rather than only in written procedures.
Does the initiative include examining community partnerships during transition?
Yes. The opportunity specifically mentions examining how outside partners are engaged during the transition, including employers, schools, community-based organizations, nonprofits, and other service systems.
What types of supports during the halfway house period are included in the evaluation scope?
NIC asks what supports are realistically available during the halfway house period and whether there is a coherent continuum of care. Examples mentioned include employment help, life skills programming, mental health care, and substance use treatment.
What does NIC mean by “continuum of care” in this context?
In the context of this opportunity, NIC is looking at whether services and supports during the halfway house period connect in a coherent way (a continuum of care) rather than being fragmented across providers or systems.
What is the desired outcome of the evaluation work?
The desired outcome is actionable findings that reveal operational realities and bottlenecks so the decision points and placement implementation can be improved. The work is intended to support improvements that make the release-to-halfway-house process more consistent, fair, evidence-informed, and supportive of successful reentry outcomes.
What type of award is this?
This opportunity is offered as a cooperative agreement. That means NIC will likely have substantial involvement during the project.
What is the funding opportunity number and CFDA listing?
The funding opportunity number is 26CS06 under CFDA 16.602.
How many awards does NIC expect to make?
NIC expects to make one award.
What is the maximum award amount (ceiling)?
The ceiling for the award is $100,000.
What is the application closing date?
The original closing date is May 4, 2026.
When was the opportunity created?
The opportunity was created on March 5, 2026.
Who is eligible to apply?
Eligibility includes nonprofit organizations (including faith-based, community, and tribal organizations), for-profit organizations (including tribal for-profits), and institutions of higher education (including tribal institutions).
Are for-profit organizations allowed to apply?
Yes. For-profit organizations (including tribal for-profits) are eligible. However, for-profit recipients must waive any profit or fee for services.
Are foreign governments or international organizations eligible?
No. Foreign governments and international organizations are not eligible.
What documentation is required to demonstrate eligibility?
The opportunity requires proof of 501(c)(3) status for nonprofit organizations or an authorizing tribal resolution for tribal entities, as applicable.
Are partnerships or collaborations allowed?
Yes. Partnerships are allowed and encouraged. One eligible entity must serve as the primary applicant, and partners must be included as subrecipients.
Can multiple organizations submit a joint application?
The opportunity allows partnerships, but it specifies that one eligible organization must be the primary applicant and other participating organizations must be included as subrecipients.
How many applications can an organization submit?
Only one application may be submitted per organization.
Does NIC want the evaluation to focus on written policy or actual practice?
NIC emphasizes examining actual practice. The evaluation should map and analyze how decisions are really made and implemented, and identify where informal norms or unwritten rules may influence outcomes more than formal policy.
What kinds of staff decision-makers are mentioned as having discretionary authority?
The opportunity notes that decisions often rest with individuals who have significant discretionary authority, such as wardens, community corrections managers, and case managers.
What kinds of formal constraints can influence halfway house release decisions?
NIC notes that release decisions may be shaped by legal mandates, statutes, zoning requirements, timelines, and written procedures.
What problems can arise when discretion is high?
NIC points to risks such as variation in eligibility determinations, differences in how criteria are weighted, inconsistent policy application across teams or locations, deviations from program design, and uneven application of rules when subjective judgment or informal norms drive outcomes.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Other
Next opportunity: CONSORTIUM FOR NUCLEAR FORENSICS
Previous opportunity: FY 2026 American Film Showcase
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for 26CS06
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (26CS06) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| FY 2026 John McCain Study of the U.S. Institute for Student Leaders on the Rule of Law and Public Service Apply for DFOP0017914 Funding Number: DFOP0017914 Agency: Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs Category: Other Funding Amount: $400,000 |
| FY 2027 Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Program Apply for DFOP0017910 Funding Number: DFOP0017910 Agency: Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs Category: Other Funding Amount: $10,250,000 |
| Mission Nigeria’s Alumni Engagement Innovation Fund Apply for PDS AEIF FY26 01 Funding Number: PDS AEIF FY26 01 Agency: U.S. Mission to Nigeria Category: Other Funding Amount: $35,000 |
| FY 2026 Study of the U.S. Institutes for Scholars Apply for DFOP0017918 Funding Number: DFOP0017918 Agency: Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs Category: Other Funding Amount: $1,500,000 |
| New Jail Planning Initiative Apply for 26JD06 Funding Number: 26JD06 Agency: National Institute of Corrections Category: Other Funding Amount: $350,000 |
| Structured Decision-Making Framework Implementation Project Apply for 26CS04 Funding Number: 26CS04 Agency: National Institute of Corrections Category: Other Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| Sustaining Implementation of Organizational Resources to Support Behavior Change Apply for 26CS05 Funding Number: 26CS05 Agency: National Institute of Corrections Category: Other Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| Freedom 250: Kazakhstan Youth Leadership Camp Apply for DOS KAZ AST PDS 26 001 Funding Number: DOS KAZ AST PDS 26 001 Agency: U.S. Mission to Kazakhstan Category: Other Funding Amount: $80,000 |
| FY 2026 U.S. Leadership in Education, Advanced Manufacturing, and Digital Skills (U.S. LEADS) Program Apply for DFOP0017930 Funding Number: DFOP0017930 Agency: Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs Category: Other Funding Amount: $2,500,000 |
| FY 2026 Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) Academic Fellows Program Apply for DFOP0017934 Funding Number: DFOP0017934 Agency: Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs Category: Other Funding Amount: $4,300,000 |
| Managing Restrictive Housing Populations Training Apply for 26JD04 Funding Number: 26JD04 Agency: National Institute of Corrections Category: Other Funding Amount: $186,000 |
| Alumni Engagement Innovation Fund Apply for DOS PDS FY26 01 Funding Number: DOS PDS FY26 01 Agency: U.S. Mission to Uganda Category: Other Funding Amount: $35,000 |
| OIA Technical Assistance Program 2026 Apply for OIA TAP 2026 Funding Number: OIA TAP 2026 Agency: Department of the Interior Category: Other Funding Amount: $22,500,000 |
| OIA Maintenance Assistance Program 2026 Apply for OIA MAP 2026 Funding Number: OIA MAP 2026 Agency: Department of the Interior Category: Other Funding Amount: $4,375,000 |
| OIA Brown Treesnake Program 2026 Apply for OIA BTS 2026 Funding Number: OIA BTS 2026 Agency: Department of the Interior Category: Other Funding Amount: $4,000,000 |
| Grants for Adaptive Sports Programs for Disabled Veterans and Disabled Members of the Armed Forces Apply for VA SPORTS 26 Funding Number: VA SPORTS 26 Agency: National Veterans Sports Programs Category: Other Funding Amount: $750,000 |
| FY 2026 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Small Shipyard Grants Apply for DTMASSG26 Funding Number: DTMASSG26 Agency: Maritime Administration Category: Other Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| U.S. Embassy Cotonou AEIF FY2026 Notice of Funding Opportunity Apply for OFOP0002524 Funding Number: OFOP0002524 Agency: U.S. Mission to Benin Category: Other Funding Amount: $35,000 |
| 2026 Alumni Engagement Innovation Fund (AEIF) Apply for PDS KIGALI FY26 001 Funding Number: PDS KIGALI FY26 001 Agency: U.S. Mission to Rwanda Category: Other Funding Amount: $35,000 |
| U.S. Embassy Bishkek Public Diplomacy Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Apply for STATE BISHKEK PDS 26 0003 Funding Number: STATE BISHKEK PDS 26 0003 Agency: U.S. Mission to Kyrgyzstan Category: Other Funding Amount: $50,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "26CS06", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.