Opportunity Information: Apply for F15AS00225
Apply for F15AS00225
- The Fish and Wildlife Service in the environment natural resources regional development science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Develop climate change synthesis" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.669 Cooperative Landscape Conservation.
- This funding opportunity was created on May 27, 2015 and posted on May 14, 2015.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jul 13, 2015 Close date July 13, 2015. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $185,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $185,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted (i.e., open to any type of entity above), subject to any clarification in text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Develop climate change synthesis grant opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number F15AS00225) was a Fiscal Year 2015 discretionary funding announcement from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Pacific Region, issued in support of the Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative (PICCC). The overall purpose was to fund the creation of comprehensive, science-based syntheses describing how climate change may affect the terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems of the main Hawaiian Islands. Rather than producing a single generic statewide report, the project was designed to generate island-specific syntheses, recognizing that each island has distinct species, habitats, management contexts, and conservation pressures that require tailored analysis and recommendations.
A central expectation of the project was that the syntheses would translate existing climate change science into practical decision-support products for conservation planning and on-the-ground management. Proposals were expected to draw from available climate data, peer-reviewed literature, and other credible scientific sources to describe both observed trends and plausible future conditions. The scope specifically called for coverage of key climate variables such as temperature, winds, rainfall patterns, and sea level, and it emphasized that projections should address uncertainty appropriately. In other words, the work was not just about listing predicted changes, but about communicating ranges, confidence levels, and where important knowledge gaps remain, so land managers can make risk-informed decisions.
Beyond describing future climate conditions, the grant required applicants to assess how those climatic changes could affect ecosystems and native species, both currently and in the future. This included considering impacts to ecological processes and habitat conditions relevant to terrestrial and freshwater systems, as well as consequences for species persistence. The syntheses were also expected to connect these impacts directly to conservation lands by explaining what the projected changes mean for protected areas, priority habitats, and management units, and by highlighting vulnerabilities or management challenges that may become more acute under changing conditions.
An important deliverable theme was identifying opportunities to reduce climate-related losses of natural resources and the conservation and cultural values tied to those resources. The announcement pointed toward management strategies and public-private collaboration as key avenues for adaptation, implying that the final products should not only diagnose problems but also outline realistic response options. This could include, for example, approaches that support resilience, reduce non-climate stressors, improve connectivity, protect climate refugia, or adjust management to anticipated hydrologic and ecosystem shifts, while also acknowledging the cultural importance of Hawaiian landscapes and freshwater resources.
The project was structured to be highly collaborative with land managers. Consultation was expected at multiple stages, with the clear intent that agency staff and local practitioners would help shape the questions being addressed, the format of outputs, and how information would be organized so it is directly usable in planning processes. FWS personnel were expected to be substantially involved in assisting with various aspects of the work, which aligns with the funding instrument type being a Cooperative Agreement rather than a more hands-off grant mechanism. This cooperative structure generally indicates ongoing federal involvement, coordination, and shared responsibility in execution and refinement of deliverables.
In terms of funding details, the opportunity anticipated a single award with an estimated total funding amount of $185,000. The award ceiling was $185,000 and the award floor was $100,000, and there was no cost-sharing or matching requirement. The program was categorized under Environment, Natural Resources, Regional Development, and Science and Technology/Research and Development, and it was associated with CFDA number 15.669 (Cooperative Landscape Conservation). Eligibility was listed as unrestricted, meaning it was open to a broad range of applicant types, subject to any additional eligibility clarifications in the full announcement.
Key dates show the opportunity was posted on May 14, 2015, with an original closing date of June 14, 2015, later extended to a current closing date of July 13, 2015. The archive date was July 14, 2015. Applicants were directed to find the full announcement and submission details through Grants.gov. For access issues or assistance, the listed contact was Connie Sauer (503-872-2826, ConnieSauer@fws.gov).
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the "Develop climate change synthesis" opportunity (F15AS00225)?
It was a Fiscal Year 2015 discretionary funding opportunity from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Pacific Region, issued to support the Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative (PICCC). The project focused on developing comprehensive, science-based climate change syntheses for the main Hawaiian Islands.
What was the main purpose of the funding?
The purpose was to fund the creation of practical, decision-support syntheses describing how climate change may affect terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems of the main Hawaiian Islands, with content intended to be useful for conservation planning and on-the-ground management.
What kind of product or deliverable was expected?
The expected outputs were comprehensive, science-based syntheses that translate existing climate science into usable products for land managers and conservation practitioners, including interpretation of observed trends and plausible future conditions and what those changes mean for management.
Was the project supposed to produce one statewide report for Hawaii?
No. The opportunity specifically emphasized island-specific syntheses rather than a single generic statewide report, recognizing that each island has different species, habitats, management contexts, and conservation pressures.
Which ecosystems were the focus of the syntheses?
The syntheses were focused on terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems of the main Hawaiian Islands.
What climate variables were expected to be addressed?
The scope called for coverage of key climate variables including temperature, winds, rainfall patterns, and sea level.
What sources of information were proposals expected to use?
Proposals were expected to draw from available climate data, peer-reviewed literature, and other credible scientific sources.
Did the opportunity require discussion of uncertainty in climate projections?
Yes. The announcement emphasized that projections should address uncertainty appropriately, including communicating ranges, confidence levels, and where important knowledge gaps remain.
Beyond climate conditions, what impacts were applicants expected to assess?
Applicants were expected to assess how climatic changes could affect ecosystems and native species, now and in the future. This included impacts on ecological processes, habitat conditions relevant to terrestrial and freshwater systems, and consequences for species persistence.
How were conservation lands and management units supposed to be incorporated?
The syntheses were expected to connect projected climate impacts directly to conservation lands by explaining implications for protected areas, priority habitats, and management units, and by highlighting vulnerabilities or management challenges that may intensify under changing conditions.
Were adaptation or response options part of the expected content?
Yes. A key theme was identifying opportunities to reduce climate-related losses of natural resources and the conservation and cultural values tied to those resources. The announcement pointed toward management strategies and public-private collaboration as important avenues for adaptation.
What types of adaptation approaches were mentioned or implied?
The description indicated that response options could include strategies to support resilience, reduce non-climate stressors, improve connectivity, protect climate refugia, or adjust management in anticipation of hydrologic and ecosystem shifts, while acknowledging cultural importance of Hawaiian landscapes and freshwater resources.
Was collaboration with land managers required?
Yes. The project was designed to be highly collaborative. Consultation with land managers was expected at multiple stages so the questions, format of outputs, and organization of information would be directly usable in planning processes.
Why was the funding instrument a Cooperative Agreement instead of a standard grant?
The opportunity notes that FWS personnel were expected to be substantially involved in assisting with various aspects of the work. That level of ongoing federal involvement aligns with a Cooperative Agreement structure.
How much funding was available?
The opportunity anticipated a single award with an estimated total funding amount of $185,000.
What were the award ceiling and award floor?
The award ceiling was $185,000 and the award floor was $100,000.
Was cost sharing or matching required?
No. The announcement stated there was no cost-sharing or matching requirement.
How many awards were expected?
The opportunity anticipated a single award.
Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was listed as unrestricted, meaning it was open to a broad range of applicant types, subject to any additional eligibility clarifications in the full announcement.
Which agency issued the opportunity?
The opportunity was issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Pacific Region, in support of the Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative (PICCC).
What CFDA number was associated with this opportunity?
The opportunity was associated with CFDA number 15.669 (Cooperative Landscape Conservation).
What program categories were associated with the opportunity?
The opportunity was categorized under Environment, Natural Resources, Regional Development, and Science and Technology/Research and Development.
When was the opportunity posted?
It was posted on May 14, 2015.
What was the application deadline?
The original closing date was June 14, 2015, and it was later extended to a current closing date of July 13, 2015.
When was the opportunity archived?
The archive date was July 14, 2015.
Where were applicants directed to find the full announcement and submission instructions?
Applicants were directed to Grants.gov for the full announcement and submission details.
Who was the point of contact for access issues or assistance?
The listed contact was Connie Sauer at 503-872-2826 or ConnieSauer@fws.gov.
Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Fish and Wildlife Service
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Environment Natural Resources Regional Development Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: ROSES 2015 New (Early Career) Investigator Program in Earth Science
Previous opportunity: PPHF 2015 Tobacco Use Prevention Public Health Approaches for Ensuring Quitline Capacity financed solely by 2015 Prevention and Public Health Funds
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for F15AS00225
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "F15AS00225", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.