Opportunity Information: Apply for FWS R6 ARIZONACRUCIALHABITATS
Apply for FWS R6 ARIZONACRUCIALHABITATS
- The Fish and Wildlife Service in the environment natural resources sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "SRLCC State of Arizona Decision Support System Development for Crucial Habitats and Corridors" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.664 Fish and Wildlife Coordination and Assistance Programs.
- This funding opportunity was created on Oct 4, 2011 and posted on Oct 4, 2011.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Oct 5, 2011. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $95,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $95,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- This is a notice of intent to award this agreement to Arizona Game and Fish Department under the Fish and Wildlife Land Conservation Cooperatives. See attached competition and selection process document.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The SRLCC State of Arizona Decision Support System Development for Crucial Habitats and Corridors grant opportunity was a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) discretionary grant aimed at strengthening Arizona's ability to manage, organize, and share conservation-relevant geospatial information across state and regional partners. The project centered on building or enhancing a decision support system (DSS) focused on "crucial habitats and corridors," meaning habitat areas and wildlife movement pathways that are especially important for conservation planning, connectivity, and landscape-scale management. The effort was designed to align Arizona's work with broader western states approaches, so that the resulting data and tools would not sit in isolation but instead contribute to coordinated, multi-state conservation decision-making.
The core work described in the announcement emphasized project oversight and strong coordination across technical and partnership channels. The recipient was expected to manage the project in collaboration with an in-house GIS technical team to handle the technical execution, while also coordinating with the Western Governors Association (WGA) on shared western states protocols, the collective needs of decision support systems, and general development considerations. A regular cadence of coordination was built in, including participation in monthly phone conferences, reflecting that the grant was as much about interoperability and shared standards as it was about producing Arizona-specific GIS outputs.
A major technical deliverable involved updating and standardizing GIS datasets that would be centralized for the project. In practical terms, that meant cleaning up, harmonizing, and preparing spatial data layers so they could be combined consistently and used for analysis without mismatched formats, inconsistent attributes, or incompatible metadata. The announcement also highlighted the development of an organizational structure for how data would be housed, such as a centralized geodatabase. This points to an emphasis on durable data management: not just creating maps, but building a structured, maintainable repository that supports ongoing updates, multi-user access, and consistent downstream analysis.
Interstate coordination was explicitly built into the scope, particularly with Utah. The recipient was expected to attend and participate in meetings held by WGA and the Southern Rockies Landscape Conservation Cooperative (SRLCC) to coordinate with other state pilot efforts, exchange ideas, and develop standards and protocols for data sharing and interstate data flow. Sharing information with Utah was singled out as a priority, with an expectation of mutually beneficial cooperation toward a more integrated data management system. Beyond simple coordination, the project also called for developing and sharing methods, protocols, and spatial analysis tools, suggesting that the work would produce reusable technical approaches (such as standardized workflows, analytical models, or toolsets) that could be adopted by partner states to support compatible conservation planning.
The opportunity also required engagement with SRLCC through meetings, phone conferences, and other mutually agreed settings, plus participation in broader meetings that connected the project to other landscape-scale efforts. This reflects the Landscape Conservation Cooperative model, which is built around coordinating conservation science and management across jurisdictions and partner organizations. The stated intent was to exchange ideas and develop standards and protocols for information sharing and interstate information flow, and to share information about landscape project partners in support of an integrated information system. In other words, the grant was structured to help build a connected ecosystem of data, tools, and partner relationships that would make habitat and corridor planning more coordinated across the region.
Administratively, the opportunity was posted on October 4, 2011, with a closing date of October 5, 2011, indicating it functioned as a short-notice or pre-identified award action rather than an open, extended competition. The estimated total funding was $95,000, with an award ceiling of $95,000 and an award floor of $1,000, and it anticipated a single award. It fell under CFDA 15.664, Fish and Wildlife Coordination and Assistance Programs, and did not require cost sharing or matching. Eligibility was effectively limited by a notice of intent to award to the Arizona Game and Fish Department under the Fish and Wildlife Land Conservation Cooperatives framework, with the project competed through the SRLCC program per the attached competition and selection process documentation referenced in the announcement.
The legal authority cited for awarding the agreement was Section 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1262), as amended, which is a common statutory foundation used by FWS for certain organizational and program authorities. For access or administrative issues related to the full announcement, the listed contact was Andrea Meyer, Grants Management Specialist, at 303-236-5412. Overall, the grant was a targeted investment in Arizona's geospatial decision support capacity, with a clear emphasis on data standardization, centralized data infrastructure, and cross-state interoperability so that crucial habitat and corridor information could move smoothly between partners and support coordinated conservation decisions across the Southern Rockies and the broader West.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the "SRLCC State of Arizona Decision Support System Development for Crucial Habitats and Corridors" grant?
It was a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) discretionary grant opportunity intended to strengthen Arizona's ability to manage, organize, and share conservation-relevant geospatial information with state and regional partners. The main focus was developing or enhancing a decision support system (DSS) centered on crucial habitats and wildlife corridors to support conservation planning and landscape-scale management.
Who offered this grant opportunity?
The opportunity was offered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under the Southern Rockies Landscape Conservation Cooperative (SRLCC) framework.
What does "SRLCC" refer to in this opportunity?
SRLCC refers to the Southern Rockies Landscape Conservation Cooperative, a partnership-oriented model designed to coordinate conservation science and management across jurisdictions and organizations. In this opportunity, SRLCC involvement included meetings, calls, and coordination with other landscape-scale efforts.
What was the purpose of funding a decision support system (DSS) for "crucial habitats and corridors"?
The DSS work was meant to support conservation planning, connectivity, and landscape-scale management by organizing and making usable spatial information about key habitat areas and important wildlife movement pathways. The project was also designed so Arizona's tools and data could align with broader western states approaches rather than being isolated.
What are "crucial habitats and corridors" in the context of this grant?
In this announcement, "crucial habitats and corridors" meant habitat areas and wildlife movement pathways that are especially important for conservation planning, ecological connectivity, and regional (landscape-scale) management decisions.
What kinds of activities and deliverables were emphasized in the scope?
The announcement emphasized project oversight and coordination across partners and technical teams, plus major technical work such as updating and standardizing GIS datasets, centralizing data, and establishing durable data management structures (for example, a centralized geodatabase). The work also included developing and sharing methods, protocols, and spatial analysis tools to support compatible use across states.
What role did GIS data standardization play in this project?
A major technical deliverable was updating and standardizing GIS datasets so they could be centralized and used consistently. This included preparing spatial data layers so they could be combined reliably for analysis without mismatched formats, inconsistent attributes, or incompatible metadata.
Was a centralized data repository required?
The scope highlighted developing an organizational structure for how data would be housed, such as a centralized geodatabase. This reflects an emphasis on maintainable, structured data management that supports ongoing updates and consistent downstream analysis.
How important was coordination with partners versus only producing Arizona-specific outputs?
Coordination was a core feature of the opportunity. The grant emphasized interoperability and shared standards across the West, meaning Arizona-specific GIS outputs were expected to fit into coordinated, multi-state conservation decision-making rather than remain standalone products.
Which organizations were specifically called out for coordination?
The recipient was expected to coordinate with the Western Governors Association (WGA) and engage with SRLCC through meetings, phone conferences, and other agreed settings. Coordination with other state pilot efforts was also part of the scope.
What was the expected coordination cadence during the project?
The announcement specified participation in monthly phone conferences as part of the regular coordination approach.
What role did the Western Governors Association (WGA) play?
The recipient was expected to coordinate with WGA on shared western states protocols, decision support system needs, and general development considerations, supporting consistent approaches across states.
Why was Utah specifically mentioned in the scope?
Interstate coordination was explicitly built into the project, and sharing information with Utah was singled out as a priority. The expectation was mutually beneficial cooperation toward a more integrated data management system and smoother interstate data flow.
Did the project include creating tools or methods that could be reused by other states?
Yes. Beyond data coordination, the scope called for developing and sharing methods, protocols, and spatial analysis tools, implying reusable workflows or toolsets that partner states could adopt to support compatible conservation planning.
Was this an open competitive grant opportunity?
Based on the announcement details, eligibility was effectively limited by a notice of intent to award to the Arizona Game and Fish Department under the Fish and Wildlife Land Conservation Cooperatives framework. The short open/close window also indicates it functioned more like a short-notice or pre-identified award action than a long, open competition.
Who was eligible to receive this award?
The opportunity indicated a notice of intent to award to the Arizona Game and Fish Department, effectively limiting eligibility as described in the announcement.
How many awards were anticipated?
The opportunity anticipated a single award.
What was the total estimated funding amount?
The estimated total funding was $95,000.
What were the award ceiling and floor?
The award ceiling was $95,000 and the award floor was $1,000.
Was cost sharing or matching required?
No. The announcement stated that cost sharing or matching was not required.
When was the opportunity posted and when did it close?
It was posted on October 4, 2011, and the closing date was October 5, 2011.
Which CFDA program did this opportunity fall under?
It fell under CFDA 15.664, Fish and Wildlife Coordination and Assistance Programs.
What legal authority was cited for awarding the agreement?
The announcement cited Section 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1262), as amended.
What types of engagement with SRLCC were expected?
The opportunity required engagement through SRLCC meetings, phone conferences, and other mutually agreed settings, plus participation in broader meetings intended to connect the project to other landscape-scale efforts.
What was the main goal of the interstate and partner coordination components?
The stated intent was to exchange ideas and develop standards and protocols for information sharing and interstate information flow, and to share information about landscape project partners in support of a more integrated information system.
Who was the listed contact for access or administrative issues?
The listed contact was Andrea Meyer, Grants Management Specialist, at 303-236-5412.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Environment Natural Resources
Next opportunity: SRLCC State of New Mexico Geospatial Data Management, Information Sharing and Preparation for decision Support System Development
Previous opportunity: Community Development Block Grant Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages (ICDBG)
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for FWS R6 ARIZONACRUCIALHABITATS
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (FWS R6 ARIZONACRUCIALHABITATS) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| SRLCC State of New Mexico Geospatial Data Management, Information Sharing and Preparation for decision Support System Development Apply for FWS R6 NEWMEXICOGEOSPATIALDATAMGMT Funding Number: FWS R6 NEWMEXICOGEOSPATIALDATAMGMT Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $95,000 |
| Migratory Bird Joint Ventures Playa Lakes Joint Venture Base Operations Apply for FWS R2 PLJV 2012 Funding Number: FWS R2 PLJV 2012 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| SRLCC Utah participation and coordination among State and Federal Partners for landscape conservation activities Apply for FWS R6 UTAHLANDSCAPECONSERVATION Funding Number: FWS R6 UTAHLANDSCAPECONSERVATION Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $40,000 |
| Climate Adaptation Case Studies in the Great Northern LCC Apply for FWS R6 CLIMATEADAPTATIONSTUDIES Funding Number: FWS R6 CLIMATEADAPTATIONSTUDIES Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $95,000 |
| Tracking Wetland Changes over Time at Multiple Scales in Bird Conservation Regions 9 and 10 Apply for FWS R6 TRACKINGWETLANDCHANGES Funding Number: FWS R6 TRACKINGWETLANDCHANGES Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| Establishing aquatic monitoring programs for large scale restoration projects Apply for FWS R6 AQUATICMONITORINGPROGRAMS Funding Number: FWS R6 AQUATICMONITORINGPROGRAMS Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $39,068 |
| Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act Apply for DOI GRANTS 102204 003 Funding Number: DOI GRANTS 102204 003 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| State Wildlife Grants Competitive Grant Program Apply for DOI FWS WSFR SWGCOMP12 Funding Number: DOI FWS WSFR SWGCOMP12 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund Apply for CESCF 12 Funding Number: CESCF 12 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $6,000,000 |
| National Sea Grant Library Apply for NOAA OAR SG 2012 2003207 Funding Number: NOAA OAR SG 2012 2003207 Agency: Department of Commerce Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $235,000 |
| Great Lakes Areas of Concern Land Acquisition Grants Apply for NOAA NOS OCRM 2012 2003197 Funding Number: NOAA NOS OCRM 2012 2003197 Agency: Department of Commerce Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| Synthesis and communication of results from the evaluation of a pelagic organism decline (POD) in the upper San Francisco Estuary Apply for IEP1201 Funding Number: IEP1201 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $434,973 |
| 2012 Pacific Islands Region Marine Turtle Management Program Apply for NOAA NMFS PIRO 2012 2003230 Funding Number: NOAA NMFS PIRO 2012 2003230 Agency: Department of Commerce Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| NRDA 2012 Implementation Grants Apply for NOAA NMFS HCPO 2012 2003241 Funding Number: NOAA NMFS HCPO 2012 2003241 Agency: Department of Commerce Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Coastal Program Apply for F12AS00009 Funding Number: F12AS00009 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Partners for Fish and Wildlife 2012 Apply for F12AS00014 Funding Number: F12AS00014 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| 7th Meeting of Partners of the East Asian Australasian Flyaway Partnership Apply for F12AS00043 Funding Number: F12AS00043 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $42,000 |
| National Coastal Wetland Conservation Grant Program Apply for F12AS00044 Funding Number: F12AS00044 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| The Western Alaska Landscape Conservation Cooperative (WALCC) 2012 Request for Project Proposals Apply for F12AS00052 Funding Number: F12AS00052 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: $250,000 |
| Fiscal Year 2012 Candidate Conservation Action Funds Apply for F12AS00066 Funding Number: F12AS00066 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Environment Natural Resources Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "FWS R6 ARIZONACRUCIALHABITATS", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.