Opportunity Information: Apply for ED GRANTS 083013 001

  • The Department of Education in the education sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Department of Education and Department of Health and Human Services Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge CFDA Number 84.412A" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Aug 30, 2013 and posted on Aug 30, 2013.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by Oct 16, 2013 Applications Available August 30, 2013. Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply September 30, 2013. We will be able to develop a more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if we know the approximate number of applicants that intend to apply for funding under this competition. Therefore, the Departments strongly encourage each potential applicant to notify us of the applicants intent to submit an application for funding by emailing Miriam Lund at RTT ELC.P3.Competition@ed.gov. This short email message should provide (1) The name of the State applying, (2) the contact person (name, phone number, and email), and (3) all competitive preference priorities the applicant intends to address. Applicants that do not submit an Intent to Apply email may still apply for funding. Note Submission of a notice of intent to apply is optional. Date of Technical Assistance Planning Workshop September 10, 2013. To assist States in preparing the application and to respond to questions, ED and HHS intend to host a Technical Assistance Planning Workshop with potential applicants on September 10, 2013, to review the priorities, requirements, and selection criteria for this competition. To minimize travel burdens associated with this workshop and to maximize the number of potential applicants who can participate, the Departments will also broadcast this workshop live at edstream.ed.gov. The purpose of the workshop will be to allow teams of participants responsible for developing applications to review with Federal program staff the priorities, requirements, and selection criteria for this competition and to ask questions about the RTT ELC competition. We strongly encourage all interested State applicants to participate in the workshop, either in Washington, DC. For those who cannot attend the workshop in person, a video recording of the workshop will be available on the RTT ELC Web site at www.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop earlylearningchallenge. The Departments may host additional conference calls, workshops, or Webinars to answer applicant questions and will be posting Frequently Asked Questions and responses on the RTT ELC Web site. The Departments will make available all registration information and additional details for the September 10, 2013, workshop and any other technical assistance events on the RTT ELC Web site at www.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop earlylearningchallenge. Note Please refer to the Department of Educations RTT ELC Web site (http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop earlylearningchallenge/index.html) for meeting details. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications October 16, 2013.. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • The funding agency has allocated a total of $280,000,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
  • Eligible applicants include: State governments Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • States must meet the following requirements (a) The State has not previously received an RTT ELC grant. (b) The Lead Agency must have executed with each Participating State Agency a memorandum of understanding or other binding agreement that the State must attach to its application, describing the Participating State Agencys level of participation in the grant. At a minimum, the MOU or other binding agreement must include an assurance that the Participating State Agency agrees to use, to the extent applicable (1) A set of statewide Early Learning and Development Standards (2) A set of statewide Program Standards (3) A statewide Tiered Quality Rating and Improvement System and (4) A statewide Workforce Knowledge and Competency Framework and progression of credentials. (c) There must be an active MIECHV program in the State, either through the State under section 511(c) of Title V of the Social Security Act, as added by section 2951 of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111 148), or through an eligible non profit organization under section 511(h)(2)(B).
Apply for ED GRANTS 083013 001

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

The Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT ELC), CFDA 84.412A, was a discretionary federal grant competition jointly associated with the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The central goal of the program was to raise the quality of early learning and development statewide and to reduce school-readiness and later academic gaps for Children with High Needs. In practice, the competition was designed to push states to build stronger, more coordinated early childhood systems and to expand access to high-quality early learning and development programs, especially for low-income and otherwise disadvantaged children across the infant, toddler, and preschool age ranges.

A major emphasis of the opportunity was not just adding more seats in early learning programs, but increasing the number of children from high-need populations who are actually enrolled in programs that meet a high-quality bar. Alongside access and quality, the program also prioritized statewide system-building, meaning states were expected to plan for an integrated set of services and programs rather than a fragmented landscape where child care, pre-K, health, and family support programs operate in isolation. The notice makes clear that the overall design is about aligning standards, accountability, and workforce expectations across the early childhood sector so that families experience a more consistent and effective system regardless of the setting they choose.

Eligibility was aimed primarily at state governments, with additional conditions spelled out in the official Federal Register notice. Key eligibility requirements included that the state could not have previously received an RTT ELC grant and that the state had to identify a Lead Agency capable of coordinating the work. The Lead Agency was required to have executed memoranda of understanding (MOUs) or other binding agreements with each Participating State Agency, and those agreements had to be attached to the application. At a minimum, participating agencies had to agree, to the extent applicable, to use and align around several core statewide elements: statewide Early Learning and Development Standards, statewide Program Standards, a statewide Tiered Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS), and a statewide Workforce Knowledge and Competency Framework along with a progression of credentials. Another stated eligibility condition was that the state needed an active Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program, either operated by the state under the relevant Social Security Act authority or through an eligible nonprofit organization, reflecting the program's interest in connecting early learning improvement with broader early childhood and family support infrastructure.

The total estimated funding available for this competition was listed as $280,000,000. The opportunity did not require cost sharing or matching funds, which matters because it lowered the barrier for states to propose ambitious system reforms without needing to secure non-federal match commitments as a condition of applying. Even so, the underlying expectation was that a competitive application would show strong cross-agency alignment and the ability to sustain improvements over time, since the competition structure is about statewide reform rather than isolated pilot projects.

The timeline in the synopsis shows the application materials were available on August 30, 2013, with an optional notice of intent to apply encouraged by September 30, 2013. While the notice of intent was not required, the departments requested it to help plan the review process, and states were asked to email the program contact with the state name, a primary contact person, and which competitive preference priorities they intended to address. A Technical Assistance Planning Workshop was scheduled for September 10, 2013, with a live broadcast option to reduce travel burdens and broaden access; the departments also indicated they might offer additional calls, webinars, and FAQs via the program website to support applicants. The hard deadline for submission was October 16, 2013, and applications had to be received by 4:30 p.m. Washington, DC time; late applications were not to be considered.

Submission requirements were unusually specific and somewhat old-school by current standards, centered on physical delivery of electronic media. Applicants had to submit an electronic application package on CD or DVD (CD-ROM or DVD-ROM preferred), and the agencies strongly recommended submitting three identical discs to reduce the risk of damage or corruption. Each disc had to contain four clearly labeled files: a searchable PDF of the main application narrative including required budget tables (not a scanned, non-searchable PDF), a PDF of all appendices, a PDF of required signature pages (these could be scanned) including signed MOUs or other binding agreements for participating agencies, and a separate electronic budget spreadsheet file (such as XLS or XLSX) with the required budget tables and justifications for use in federal budget review. Files could not be password protected, and applicants were responsible for ensuring the files opened and printed correctly; the departments stated they would not review content that could not be opened or printed. In addition to the discs, applicants also had to submit signed originals of Section IV of the application plus one copy of that signed original, and they were instructed not to submit paper versions of the narrative or appendices because those would not be reviewed. Applications had to be sent by mail or hand delivery, and the envelope needed to display the CFDA number and suffix (84.412A) to ensure correct routing.

For official program details beyond the synopsis, the notice repeatedly points applicants to the Federal Register application notice as the authoritative source for eligibility nuances, priorities, selection criteria, performance measures, and other compliance requirements. The synopsis provides contact points for both technical access issues and program questions, including the program manager contact at the U.S. Department of Education and a general email address used for the competition.

Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) FAQs (CFDA 84.412A)

What is the Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC)?

RTT-ELC (CFDA 84.412A) was a discretionary federal grant competition jointly associated with the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The program focused on statewide improvements in early learning and development.

What was the central goal of RTT-ELC?

The central goal was to raise the quality of early learning and development statewide and reduce school-readiness and later academic gaps for Children with High Needs.

Who was the program designed to benefit most?

The competition emphasized Children with High Needs, including children from low-income and otherwise disadvantaged backgrounds, across infant, toddler, and preschool age ranges.

Was RTT-ELC mainly about expanding the number of early learning seats?

No. A major emphasis was increasing the number of children from high-need populations who are actually enrolled in programs that meet a high-quality bar, not simply adding more seats.

What does "statewide system-building" mean in this opportunity?

Statewide system-building refers to planning for an integrated set of services and programs rather than a fragmented landscape where child care, pre-K, health, and family support operate in isolation. The program pushed states toward stronger coordination and alignment across the early childhood sector.

What types of statewide alignment were states expected to pursue?

The notice emphasized aligning standards, accountability, and workforce expectations across early childhood settings so families experience a more consistent and effective system regardless of the setting they choose.

Who was eligible to apply?

Eligibility was aimed primarily at state governments, with additional conditions detailed in the official Federal Register notice.

Could a state apply if it had previously received an RTT-ELC grant?

No. A key eligibility requirement stated that the state could not have previously received an RTT-ELC grant.

What is a "Lead Agency" in RTT-ELC?

The Lead Agency is the entity the state identifies as capable of coordinating the work required under the grant.

What agreements were required between the Lead Agency and other state agencies?

The Lead Agency was required to have executed memoranda of understanding (MOUs) or other binding agreements with each Participating State Agency, and these agreements had to be attached to the application.

What minimum elements did participating agencies need to agree to align around (as applicable)?

At a minimum, participating agencies had to agree, to the extent applicable, to use and align around:

  • Statewide Early Learning and Development Standards
  • Statewide Program Standards
  • A statewide Tiered Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS)
  • A statewide Workforce Knowledge and Competency Framework, along with a progression of credentials

Was an active MIECHV program required for eligibility?

Yes. Another stated eligibility condition was that the state needed an active Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program, either operated by the state under relevant Social Security Act authority or through an eligible nonprofit organization.

How much total funding was estimated to be available?

The total estimated funding available for the competition was $280,000,000.

Did the opportunity require cost sharing or matching funds?

No. The opportunity did not require cost sharing or matching funds.

Even without a match requirement, what did the competition expect from applicants?

The synopsis indicates that a competitive application was expected to show strong cross-agency alignment and the ability to sustain improvements over time, reflecting the statewide reform focus rather than isolated pilots.

When were the application materials available?

Application materials were available on August 30, 2013.

Was there a notice of intent to apply? Was it required?

An optional notice of intent to apply was encouraged by September 30, 2013, but it was not required. The departments requested it to help plan the review process.

What information were states asked to include in the notice of intent to apply?

States were asked to email the program contact with the state name, a primary contact person, and which competitive preference priorities they intended to address.

Was technical assistance offered to applicants?

Yes. A Technical Assistance Planning Workshop was scheduled for September 10, 2013, and a live broadcast option was offered. The departments also indicated they might offer additional calls, webinars, and FAQs via the program website.

What was the application deadline?

The submission deadline was October 16, 2013. Applications had to be received by 4:30 p.m. Washington, DC time.

Were late applications accepted?

No. Late applications were not to be considered.

How were applications required to be submitted?

Applications had to be sent by mail or hand delivery. Submission was centered on physical delivery of electronic media (CD/DVD), along with specific signed paper components.

What electronic media format was required?

Applicants had to submit an electronic application package on CD or DVD (CD-ROM or DVD-ROM preferred).

How many discs were recommended?

The agencies strongly recommended submitting three identical discs to reduce the risk of damage or file corruption.

What files had to be included on each disc?

Each disc had to contain four clearly labeled files:

  • A searchable PDF of the main application narrative including required budget tables (not a scanned, non-searchable PDF)
  • A PDF of all appendices
  • A PDF of required signature pages (these could be scanned), including signed MOUs or other binding agreements for participating agencies
  • A separate electronic budget spreadsheet file (for example, XLS or XLSX) with required budget tables and justifications for federal budget review

Could the application files be password protected?

No. Files could not be password protected.

What if the submitted files could not be opened or printed?

Applicants were responsible for ensuring files opened and printed correctly. The departments stated they would not review content that could not be opened or printed.

Were paper copies of the narrative or appendices allowed?

Applicants were instructed not to submit paper versions of the narrative or appendices because those would not be reviewed.

Were any paper documents required?

Yes. In addition to the discs, applicants had to submit signed originals of Section IV of the application plus one copy of that signed original.

What needed to be on the mailing envelope for routing?

The envelope needed to display the CFDA number and suffix (84.412A) to ensure correct routing.

Where should applicants look for authoritative requirements and details beyond the synopsis?

The notice repeatedly pointed applicants to the Federal Register application notice as the authoritative source for eligibility nuances, priorities, selection criteria, performance measures, and compliance requirements.

Who could applicants contact with questions?

The synopsis provided contact points for both technical access issues and program questions, including a program manager contact at the U.S. Department of Education and a general competition email address.

Browse more: Education Grants, Education Loans, Pell Grants

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Department of Education

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Education

Next opportunity: Bouchard Plover Restoration Projects

Previous opportunity: IMRO Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant Program

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for ED GRANTS 083013 001

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (ED GRANTS 083013 001) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
OSERS NIDRR Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects Centers Program Minority Serving Institution Field Initiated Projects Program CFDA Number 84.133G 4 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 111913 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 111913 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $200,000
OSERS NIDRR Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects Centers Program Minority Serving Institution Field Initiated Projects Program CFDA Number 84.133G 5 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 111913 002

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 111913 002
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $200,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Community Living and Participation of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 4 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $500,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Community Living and Participation of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 9 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 002

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 002
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $500,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Health and Function of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 3 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 003

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 003
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $500,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Health and Function of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 8 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 004

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 004
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $500,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Employment of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 1 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 005

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 005
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $500,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Employment of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 7 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 006

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 006
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $500,000
Business Plan Interns Apply for P14AS00010

Funding Number: P14AS00010
Agency: National Park Service
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $82,262
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) Information and Communication Technologies Access CFDA Number 84.133E 1 Apply for ED GRANTS 121613 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 121613 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $950,000
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) Rehabilitation Strategies, Techniques, and Interventions CFDA Number 84.133E 3 Apply for ED GRANTS 121613 002

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 121613 002
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $950,000
OSERS National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Field Initiated Projects Program CFDA Number 84.133G 1 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 123013 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 123013 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $200,000
OSERS National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Field Initiated Projects Program CFDA Number 84.133G 2 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 123013 002

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 123013 002
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $200,000
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) Office of Indian Education (OIE) Indian Education Formula Grants to Local Educational Agencies CFDA Number 84.060A Apply for ED GRANTS 012114 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 012114 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Investing In Innovation (I3) Fund DEVELOPMENT Grants DEVELPOMENT GRANTS PRE APPLICATION CFDA Number 84.411P Apply for ED GRANTS 031414 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 031414 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Charter School Program (CSP) Grants to Non State Educational Agency (Non SEA) Planning, Program Design, and Initial Implementation Grants CFDA Number 84.282B Apply for ED GRANTS 052714 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 052714 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Charter School Program (CSP) Grants to Non State Educational Agency (Non SEA) Dissemination Grants CFDA Number 84.282C Apply for ED GRANTS 052714 002

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 052714 002
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Teacher Quality Partnership Grant Program CFDA Number 84.336S Apply for ED GRANTS 052814 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 052814 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
OSERS/NIDRR Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) Technologies to Enhance Independence in Daily Living for Adults with Cognitive Impairments CFDA Number 84.133E 5 Apply for ED GRANTS 060514 001

Funding Number: ED GRANTS 060514 001
Agency: Department of Education
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $950,000
Iraqi Young Leaders Exchange Program (IYLEP) for High School Students Apply for DOS BAGHDAD PD 2014 02

Funding Number: DOS BAGHDAD PD 2014 02
Agency: U.S. Mission to Iraq
Category: Education
Funding Amount: $1,500,000

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "ED GRANTS 083013 001", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.