Opportunity Information: Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15
Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15
- The Fish and Wildlife Service in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Fall run Chinook Model Enhancement and Completion of Model Development" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.658 Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Restoration and Implementation.
- This funding opportunity was created on Jul 15, 2010 and posted on Jul 15, 2010.
- Applicants must submit their applications by This is a Notice of Intent and the opportunity has been awarded to R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. No other applications will be reviewed.. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $75,714.00 in funding.
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- This opportunity has been awarded to R2 Resource Consultants, Inc.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
This Fish and Wildlife Service discretionary grant opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15) funded additional work needed to finish and strengthen a fall-run Chinook salmon production model for the Klamath River. The larger reason for the project was to support the federal "Secretarial Determination" process required under the Klamath Hydropower Settlement Agreement, where the Secretary of the Interior (with other federal agencies) needed solid technical information to decide whether the federal government would support removal of four mainstem dams (Iron Gate, Copco I, Copco II, and J.C. Boyle) and the broader concepts in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement. In practical terms, the model was meant to help compare expected Chinook outcomes under two alternatives: dam removal versus continuing current operations (the status quo/no action).
The award was issued as a single-source grant to R2 Resource Consultants, Inc., and it was posted on grants.gov only as a Notice of Intent, meaning it was already awarded and no other applications were considered. The amount was fixed, with an award floor and ceiling of $75,714, and there was no cost-sharing or matching requirement. The CFDA listing was 15.658 (Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Restoration and Implementation). The performance period ran from signature through June 30, 2011, and an early reporting milestone required delivery of the model and supporting documentation for an expert panel and first-level peer review by August 9, 2010.
Technically, the project focused on enhancing an existing Klamath River fall-run Chinook model that R2 was already building (with prior work funded through NMFS), because several important tasks emerged after the original scope was set. The model’s purpose was to generate annual forecasts of abundance by life stage (stage-specific abundances) and to do so in a way that explicitly represents uncertainty. To accomplish that, the model used Monte Carlo simulations that vary model coefficients so forecasts are not presented as single-point predictions but as distributions that reflect uncertainty in parameters and processes.
A major expansion in the scope involved incorporating SALMOD into the modeling framework. SALMOD is used to estimate key parts of the life cycle associated with mainstem spawning and downstream migrant mortality, leveraging an existing physical framework that links fish survival to river conditions like flow and temperature (referenced here as SIAM). Because SALMOD has specific input requirements, the project added work to produce and format needed inputs, including juvenile abundance by size class, at weekly time steps, and by location. Another added piece was calibration/validation: the Klamath SALMOD model needed to be tested to ensure its predictions match observed patterns in survival and abundance. Validation was to be done by comparing SALMOD-predicted juvenile abundances to empirical estimates from mainstem Klamath River screw traps, then iteratively varying SALMOD coefficient sets to find those that minimize prediction error relative to observed trap-based abundance estimates. The work also included explicitly modeling emergence timing, temperature-driven growth from emergence to Keno Dam, and the weekly proportion of juveniles arriving at Keno Dam, all of which are needed to produce realistic timing and size distributions for downstream movement and survival estimation.
Another enhancement addressed disease-related mortality, specifically by adding a "disease scalar" to represent juvenile losses due to parasite infection, with attention to the risk that a virulent strain of Ceratonova shasta (C. shasta) could become established in the upper Klamath Basin. In other words, the model was not only tracking hydrology and temperature effects but was also updated to account for biologically meaningful mortality that could significantly change juvenile survival outcomes, especially under different basin conditions.
The opportunity also covered additional stakeholder engagement that had been underestimated. To keep stakeholder groups informed as the model evolved, the scope added three more stakeholder meetings plus two additional technical meetings requiring travel before final model completion. This reflected the reality that the model was being used in a high-stakes policy context and needed iterative discussion, transparency, and technical review with multiple interested parties.
Finally, the project included a focused analysis of the "status quo" scenario, designed to quantify what drives variability in survival of fall-run Chinook from Iron Gate Dam to the ocean under continued dam operations. This analysis was to use multiple data sources in a simple quantitative framework: screw trap data from three mainstem sites, estimated spawner abundances in lower mainstem tributaries, NMFS run reconstruction information, and coded-wire-tag (CWT) analyses from Hankin and Logan (2010). The intended outcome was both diagnostic (identifying and quantifying key factors linked to survival variability) and evaluative (estimating the expected effects of continued dam operations on existing fall-run populations).
Deliverables were clearly defined in both written and electronic form. The written deliverable was a technical report documenting the model’s assumptions; the mathematical equations used to represent reproduction, growth, and mortality across all modeled phases other than the SALMOD component; and a detailed description of model coefficients, including how each coefficient was derived (statistical fitting, literature, or expert judgment, with attribution to the expert where relevant). A peer-reviewed manuscript was explicitly excluded from the scope due to the extra time and cost involved. The electronic deliverables included the full model code, executable files used to run the model (including the SALMOD executable), all supporting electronic materials such as data files, and the final technical report in PDF format.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is this grant opportunity?
This is a Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) discretionary grant opportunity identified as Funding Opportunity Number FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15. It funded additional work needed to finish and strengthen a fall-run Chinook salmon production model for the Klamath River.
Why was this project funded?
The larger purpose was to support the federal "Secretarial Determination" process under the Klamath Hydropower Settlement Agreement. That process required solid technical information to help the Secretary of the Interior (along with other federal agencies) decide whether the federal government would support removal of four mainstem dams (Iron Gate, Copco I, Copco II, and J.C. Boyle) and the broader concepts in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement.
What decision was the model meant to inform?
The model was intended to help compare expected Klamath River fall-run Chinook outcomes under two alternatives: dam removal versus continuing current operations (the status quo/no action).
Who received the award?
The award was issued as a single-source grant to R2 Resource Consultants, Inc.
Was this a competitive funding opportunity?
No. It was posted on Grants.gov only as a Notice of Intent, meaning it was already awarded and no other applications were considered.
What was the award amount?
The amount was fixed, with an award floor and ceiling of $75,714.
Was there any required match or cost share?
No. There was no cost-sharing or matching requirement.
What CFDA program was associated with this award?
The CFDA listing was 15.658: Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Restoration and Implementation.
What was the performance period for the grant?
The performance period ran from signature through June 30, 2011.
Were there any key interim deadlines or milestones?
Yes. An early reporting milestone required delivery of the model and supporting documentation for an expert panel and first-level peer review by August 9, 2010.
What model was being enhanced?
The project focused on enhancing an existing Klamath River fall-run Chinook model that R2 was already building. Prior work on the model had been funded through NMFS, and additional tasks emerged after the original scope was set.
What was the model designed to produce?
The model’s purpose was to generate annual forecasts of abundance by life stage (stage-specific abundances) and to represent uncertainty explicitly rather than producing only single-point forecasts.
How did the model represent uncertainty?
The model used Monte Carlo simulations that vary model coefficients. This approach produces distributions of forecast outcomes that reflect uncertainty in parameters and processes, instead of a single deterministic prediction.
What is SALMOD and why was it added?
A major expansion of scope involved incorporating SALMOD into the modeling framework. SALMOD was used to estimate key parts of the life cycle associated with mainstem spawning and downstream migrant mortality, using an existing physical framework linking fish survival to river conditions such as flow and temperature (referenced as SIAM).
What additional inputs were needed to support SALMOD?
Because SALMOD has specific input requirements, the project added work to produce and format inputs including juvenile abundance by size class, at weekly time steps, and by location.
Did the project include calibration and validation of SALMOD?
Yes. The Klamath SALMOD model was to be tested to ensure its predictions match observed patterns in survival and abundance.
How was SALMOD validation supposed to be done?
Validation was to be done by comparing SALMOD-predicted juvenile abundances to empirical estimates from mainstem Klamath River screw traps. The work included iteratively varying SALMOD coefficient sets to find those that minimize prediction error relative to observed trap-based abundance estimates.
What biological timing and growth processes were explicitly modeled?
The work included explicitly modeling emergence timing, temperature-driven growth from emergence to Keno Dam, and the weekly proportion of juveniles arriving at Keno Dam. These elements were needed to produce realistic timing and size distributions for downstream movement and survival estimation.
Did the model address disease-related mortality?
Yes. Another enhancement added a "disease scalar" to represent juvenile losses due to parasite infection, with attention to the risk that a virulent strain of Ceratonova shasta (C. shasta) could become established in the upper Klamath Basin.
Why was stakeholder engagement included in the scope?
Stakeholder engagement was expanded because it had been underestimated. The model was being used in a high-stakes policy context and needed iterative discussion, transparency, and technical review with multiple interested parties.
What stakeholder and technical meetings were added?
The scope added three more stakeholder meetings plus two additional technical meetings that required travel before final model completion.
What was the purpose of the "status quo" scenario analysis?
The project included a focused analysis of the status quo (continued dam operations) scenario to quantify what drives variability in survival of fall-run Chinook from Iron Gate Dam to the ocean.
What data sources were to be used in the status quo analysis?
The analysis was to use multiple data sources in a simple quantitative framework, including screw trap data from three mainstem sites, estimated spawner abundances in lower mainstem tributaries, NMFS run reconstruction information, and coded-wire-tag (CWT) analyses from Hankin and Logan (2010).
What were the intended outcomes of the status quo analysis?
The intended outcome was both diagnostic (identifying and quantifying key factors linked to survival variability) and evaluative (estimating expected effects of continued dam operations on existing fall-run populations).
What were the required written deliverables?
The written deliverable was a technical report documenting: (1) the model’s assumptions; (2) the mathematical equations used to represent reproduction, growth, and mortality across all modeled phases other than the SALMOD component; and (3) a detailed description of model coefficients, including how each coefficient was derived (statistical fitting, literature, or expert judgment, with attribution to the expert where relevant).
Was a peer-reviewed manuscript required?
No. A peer-reviewed manuscript was explicitly excluded from the scope due to the extra time and cost involved.
What electronic deliverables were required?
Electronic deliverables included the full model code, executable files used to run the model (including the SALMOD executable), all supporting electronic materials such as data files, and the final technical report in PDF format.
Did the deliverables include both written and electronic formats?
Yes. Deliverables were clearly defined in both written and electronic form, including a technical report and a complete package of code, executables, and supporting data/materials.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Next opportunity: Advancing Park Opportunities for Diverse Urban Youth
Previous opportunity: The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, Phase II Study Investigators (U01)
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| 2010 K 12 Summer of Innovation (SoI) Capacity Building Apply for NNG10ZNE009C Funding Number: NNG10ZNE009C Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Karuk Tribe Technical Assistance for the Development of an EIS Analysis of the Klamath Agreements for the Secretarial Determination Process Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 19 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 19 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Yurok Tribe Technical Assistance for the Development of an EIS Analysis of the Klamath Agreements for the Secretarial Determination Process Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 14 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 14 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Spatial Analysis for Species Recovery and Habitat Restoration Apply for FWS R8 YFWO ESFR 02 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO ESFR 02 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Support for Technical Report Preparation and Scoping Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06 Funding Number: FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $32,200 |
| ROSES 2010 Earth Surface and Interior Apply for NNH10ZDA001N ESI Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N ESI Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| ROSES 2010 Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Apply for NNH10ZDA001N ACMAP Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N ACMAP Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| FY 2010 Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) Partnership in Research Transition (PIRT) Program Apply for W911NF 10 R 0008 Funding Number: W911NF 10 R 0008 Agency: Dept of the Army Materiel Command Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $3,000,000 |
| Evaluation of Wheel/Rail Contact Mechanics Apply for FR RRD 10 020 Funding Number: FR RRD 10 020 Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $380,000 |
| Multi State Information Sharing and Analysis Center Program Apply for DHS 10 NPPD 123 001 Funding Number: DHS 10 NPPD 123 001 Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $3,000,000 |
| ROSES 2010 Applications of Geodetic Imaging Apply for NNH10ZDA001N GEOIM Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N GEOIM Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Railroad Research Development Study of Wheel/Rail Profiles Design and Maintenance Apply for FR RRD 10 022 Funding Number: FR RRD 10 022 Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $300,000 |
| Countermeasures to Reduce Suicides on Railway Rights of Way Apply for FR RRD 10 023 Funding Number: FR RRD 10 023 Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $185,000 |
| Research and Technology Development to Support Crew Health and Performance in Space Exploration Missions Apply for NNJ10ZSA003N Funding Number: NNJ10ZSA003N Agency: NASA Headquarters Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $350,000 |
| Basic Research to Enable Agricultural Development Apply for 10 589 Funding Number: 10 589 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Materials World Network Cooperative Activity in Materials Research between US Investigators and their Counterparts Abroad Apply for 10 588 Funding Number: 10 588 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $1,000,000 |
| Computational Mathematics Apply for PD 10 1271 Funding Number: PD 10 1271 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $1,200,000 |
| Research and Demonstration Projects Supporting the Development of High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Service Apply for BAA 2010 1 Funding Number: BAA 2010 1 Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $2,500,000 |
| Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology Apply for 10 587 Funding Number: 10 587 Agency: National Science Foundation Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $189,000 |
| Joint Fire Science Evaluate Regional Consortia Apply for L10AS00231 Funding Number: L10AS00231 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development Funding Amount: $100,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 15", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
