Opportunity Information: Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06

  • The Fish and Wildlife Service in the science and technology and other research and development sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Support for Technical Report Preparation and Scoping" and is now available to receive applicants.
  • Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 15.608 Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance.
  • This funding opportunity was created on Jul 19, 2010 and posted on Jul 19, 2010.
  • Applicants must submit their applications by this is a notice of intent. The opportunity has been awarded to Kearns West under 505 DM 2.14(4) Unique Qualifications. No other applications will be reviewed.. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
  • Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $32,200.00 in funding.
  • Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
  • Notice of Intent. Opportunity has been awarded to Kearns West.
Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06

[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:

Opportunity Summary:

This grant opportunity, titled Support for Technical Report Preparation and Scoping, was a Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) discretionary grant focused on helping the federal government produce consistent, defensible technical documentation for the Secretary of the Interior's decision-making process in the Klamath River Basin. The underlying context is a long-running, high-stakes conflict over limited water supplies and fisheries restoration in the basin, involving tribes, farmers, fishermen, conservation groups, and multiple state and federal agencies. Since 2003, the United States has invested more than $500 million in Klamath-related efforts including irrigation support, fisheries initiatives, wildlife refuge work, and other resource management actions. At the same time, PacifiCorp (owner of the Klamath River Hydroelectric Project) had pursued hydropower relicensing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), but later entered an agreement in principle with interested parties to consider removal of the lower four hydroelectric dams. That potential dam removal created a need for rigorous scientific and policy documentation to support what is called the Secretarial Determination (SD), the formal decision by the Secretary of the Interior on whether dam removal would advance salmonid fisheries restoration and serve the public interest.

The core purpose of the funded work was not to conduct new field projects, but to strengthen the technical and policy record supporting the SD and related National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents. The SD process required the best available scientific evidence, including biological information and modeling, to estimate the long-term (50-year) outcomes of two alternatives: managing the dams by removing them or retaining them. The time horizon referenced begins in 2020 and runs for 50 years, meaning the analysis needed to look well beyond short-term construction or operational impacts and instead consider long-run fisheries and ecosystem outcomes. Because multiple agencies and bureaus were involved, a major concern was making sure the various documents did not contradict each other or present misaligned policy positions that could undermine credibility, invite legal vulnerability, or weaken the Secretary's ability to rely on the record.

The work was organized into three specific tasks. Task 1 required a technical report review of SD-related documents to ensure technical and policy consistency, first within the Department of the Interior (DOI) and then between DOI and the Department of Commerce (DOC). This reflects the reality that fisheries science and policy responsibilities often cut across Interior bureaus (including FWS) and Commerce entities (notably NOAA Fisheries), and inconsistencies between them can become a major problem during interagency review or litigation. Task 2 required producing a written report that summarized findings from the review and clearly identified any inconsistencies in positions, both within bureaus and across departments. Task 3 required assisting in drafting language to resolve those inconsistencies, essentially helping agencies align terminology, assumptions, conclusions, and stated policy positions so that the SD and NEPA materials read as a coherent and defensible set of documents.

The expected products were straightforward: a consistency review of technical documents used by DOI and DOC, followed by a report documenting the findings, including any cross-bureau or cross-department inconsistencies, along with support to craft revised language that would reconcile those differences. The announcement explicitly emphasized that this work would help ensure SD and NEPA documents were defensible and internally consistent, underscoring that the deliverable was meant to improve the quality and integrity of the administrative record supporting the Secretary's decision.

The work schedule was aggressive and tied to fiscal year 2010 milestones: Task 1 was due July 30, 2010; Task 2 was due August 31, 2010; and Task 3 was due September 30, 2010. The announcement noted that if SD milestones slipped, the effort could extend into FY2011, and that a separate statement of work and funding estimate would be developed if additional work was needed. The overall performance period listed in the opportunity ran from signature through June 30, 2011, which provided flexibility in case the broader SD process encountered delays.

Administratively, this was posted as a notice of intent rather than an open competition. The opportunity had already been awarded to Kearns West under a "Unique Qualifications" authority (505 DM 2.14(4)), and the notice stated that no other applications would be reviewed. The award amount was fixed, with an award floor and ceiling both set at $32,200, and there was no cost-sharing or matching requirement. The funding instrument type was a grant, the activity category was Science and Technology and other Research and Development, and it was associated with CFDA 15.608 (Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance). The posting date and creation date were both July 19, 2010. A contact was provided for access issues: Misty Bradford, Cooperative Agreements Assistant, at 530-842-5763.

In practical terms, the opportunity funded expert support to help the federal government speak with one voice across technical and policy documents at a pivotal moment for the Klamath Basin. By focusing on document review, discrepancy identification, and careful drafting to reconcile differences, the grant aimed to reduce internal contradictions and strengthen the scientific and policy basis the Secretary of the Interior would rely on when deciding whether removing the four dams would improve salmonid restoration outcomes and serve the broader public interest.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the name of this grant opportunity?

The opportunity is titled Support for Technical Report Preparation and Scoping.

Which federal agency offered this grant?

The grant was offered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) as a discretionary grant.

What was the overall purpose of the funded work?

The purpose was to help the federal government produce consistent, defensible technical and policy documentation supporting the Secretary of the Interior's decision-making process in the Klamath River Basin, particularly for the Secretarial Determination (SD) and related NEPA documents.

What decision was this work intended to support?

The work supported the Secretarial Determination (SD), which is the Secretary of the Interior's formal decision on whether removing the lower four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River would advance salmonid fisheries restoration and serve the public interest.

What is the broader context for this grant in the Klamath River Basin?

The grant sits within a long-running conflict over limited water supplies and fisheries restoration involving tribes, farmers, fishermen, conservation groups, and multiple state and federal agencies. Since 2003, the United States invested more than $500 million in Klamath-related efforts (including irrigation support, fisheries initiatives, wildlife refuge work, and other resource management actions).

How did hydropower dam removal become part of the issue?

PacifiCorp, the owner of the Klamath River Hydroelectric Project, initially pursued hydropower relicensing with FERC, but later entered an agreement in principle with interested parties to consider removal of the lower four hydroelectric dams. That possibility increased the need for rigorous scientific and policy documentation to support the SD.

Was this grant intended to fund new fieldwork or on-the-ground projects?

No. The core purpose was not to conduct new field projects, but to strengthen the technical and policy record supporting the SD and NEPA documents through document review, inconsistency identification, and drafting support.

What type of evidence did the SD process require?

The SD process required the best available scientific evidence, including biological information and modeling, to estimate long-term outcomes of alternatives.

What alternatives were evaluated in the SD-related analysis?

The analysis needed to compare two alternatives over the long term: removing the dams versus retaining/managing the dams.

What time horizon did the technical analysis need to cover?

The documentation referenced a 50-year outcome horizon beginning in 2020, meaning the analysis needed to look beyond short-term construction or operations and consider long-run fisheries and ecosystem outcomes.

Why was consistency across documents such a big concern?

Because multiple agencies and bureaus were involved, inconsistent terminology, assumptions, or policy positions could undermine credibility, create legal vulnerability, or weaken the Secretary's ability to rely on the administrative record. The funded work aimed to prevent SD and NEPA materials from contradicting each other.

Which departments were specifically referenced in the consistency work?

The work focused on consistency first within the Department of the Interior (DOI), and then between DOI and the Department of Commerce (DOC). This reflects cross-cutting fisheries science and policy roles (including Interior bureaus such as FWS and Commerce entities such as NOAA Fisheries).

What were the three tasks funded under this opportunity?

The work was organized into three tasks:

  1. Task 1: Technical report review of SD-related documents for technical and policy consistency, first within DOI and then between DOI and DOC.
  2. Task 2: Written report summarizing findings and clearly identifying inconsistencies within bureaus and across departments.
  3. Task 3: Assistance drafting language to resolve inconsistencies, aligning terminology, assumptions, conclusions, and policy positions.

What deliverables or products were expected?

Expected products included: (1) a consistency review of technical documents used by DOI and DOC, (2) a findings report documenting inconsistencies across bureaus/departments, and (3) drafting support to reconcile differences so SD and NEPA documents read as a coherent, defensible set.

How did this work relate to NEPA?

The grant emphasized improving the defensibility and internal consistency of the documentation supporting the SD and related National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) materials, strengthening the overall administrative record.

What were the due dates for each task?

The schedule was tied to fiscal year 2010 milestones:

  • Task 1 due: July 30, 2010
  • Task 2 due: August 31, 2010
  • Task 3 due: September 30, 2010

What was the overall performance period for the award?

The overall performance period was listed as running from signature through June 30, 2011, providing flexibility if SD milestones slipped.

Could the work extend beyond fiscal year 2010?

Yes. The notice stated that if SD milestones slipped, the effort could extend into FY2011, and that a separate statement of work and funding estimate would be developed if additional work was needed.

Was this an open, competitive funding opportunity?

No. It was posted as a notice of intent rather than an open competition, and the notice stated that no other applications would be reviewed.

Who had already been selected for the award?

The opportunity had already been awarded to Kearns West.

What authority was used to justify the non-competitive award?

The notice cited a "Unique Qualifications" authority: 505 DM 2.14(4).

What was the award amount?

The award amount was fixed, with both the award floor and ceiling set at $32,200.

Was cost sharing or matching required?

No. The opportunity stated there was no cost-sharing or matching requirement.

What was the funding instrument type?

The funding instrument type was a grant.

How was the activity categorized?

The activity category was Science and Technology and other Research and Development.

What CFDA program was associated with this opportunity?

The opportunity was associated with CFDA 15.608, Fish and Wildlife Management Assistance.

When was this opportunity posted?

The posting date and creation date were both July 19, 2010.

Who was listed as the contact for access issues?

The contact listed for access issues was Misty Bradford, Cooperative Agreements Assistant, at 530-842-5763.

What practical problem was the grant trying to solve?

In practical terms, it funded expert support to help the federal government "speak with one voice" across technical and policy documents at a pivotal moment for the Klamath Basin, reducing contradictions and strengthening the scientific and policy basis for the Secretary's decision on dam removal.

Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Fish and Wildlife Service

Browse more opportunities from the same category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development

Next opportunity: Pediatric Heart Network Clinical Centers (U10)

Previous opportunity: Establish and sample long term vegetation and soils monitoring plots

USGrants.org Applicant Portal:

Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.

Apply for FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06

 

[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?

Applicants also applied for:

Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06) also looked into and applied for these:

Funding Opportunity
ROSES 2010 Earth Surface and Interior Apply for NNH10ZDA001N ESI

Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N ESI
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
ROSES 2010 Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Apply for NNH10ZDA001N ACMAP

Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N ACMAP
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
FY 2010 Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) Partnership in Research Transition (PIRT) Program Apply for W911NF 10 R 0008

Funding Number: W911NF 10 R 0008
Agency: Dept of the Army Materiel Command
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $3,000,000
Evaluation of Wheel/Rail Contact Mechanics Apply for FR RRD 10 020

Funding Number: FR RRD 10 020
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $380,000
Multi State Information Sharing and Analysis Center Program Apply for DHS 10 NPPD 123 001

Funding Number: DHS 10 NPPD 123 001
Agency: Office of Procurement Operations Grants Division
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $3,000,000
ROSES 2010 Applications of Geodetic Imaging Apply for NNH10ZDA001N GEOIM

Funding Number: NNH10ZDA001N GEOIM
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Railroad Research Development Study of Wheel/Rail Profiles Design and Maintenance Apply for FR RRD 10 022

Funding Number: FR RRD 10 022
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $300,000
Countermeasures to Reduce Suicides on Railway Rights of Way Apply for FR RRD 10 023

Funding Number: FR RRD 10 023
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $185,000
Research and Technology Development to Support Crew Health and Performance in Space Exploration Missions Apply for NNJ10ZSA003N

Funding Number: NNJ10ZSA003N
Agency: NASA Headquarters
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $350,000
Basic Research to Enable Agricultural Development Apply for 10 589

Funding Number: 10 589
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Materials World Network Cooperative Activity in Materials Research between US Investigators and their Counterparts Abroad Apply for 10 588

Funding Number: 10 588
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $1,000,000
Computational Mathematics Apply for PD 10 1271

Funding Number: PD 10 1271
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $1,200,000
Research and Demonstration Projects Supporting the Development of High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Service Apply for BAA 2010 1

Funding Number: BAA 2010 1
Agency: DOT/Federal Railroad Administration
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $2,500,000
Postdoctoral Research Fellowships in Biology Apply for 10 587

Funding Number: 10 587
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $189,000
Joint Fire Science Evaluate Regional Consortia Apply for L10AS00231

Funding Number: L10AS00231
Agency: Bureau of Land Management
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $100,000
Comparative Survival Study Delayed Mortality Workshop Apply for 13310 A J126

Funding Number: 13310 A J126
Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $23,995
Independent Science Review Services Apply for R10AS20033

Funding Number: R10AS20033
Agency: Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: $188,316
Geotechnical Engineering Apply for PD 10 1636

Funding Number: PD 10 1636
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Small Business Technology Transfer Program FY 2011 Apply for 10 590

Funding Number: 10 590
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent
Infrastructure Management and Extreme Events Apply for PD 10 1638

Funding Number: PD 10 1638
Agency: National Science Foundation
Category: Science and Technology and other Research and Development
Funding Amount: Case Dependent

 

Grant application guides and resources

It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!

Apply for Grants

 

USGrants.org applicant portal membership

 

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers

Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.

If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.

Subscribe to Leads

 

Request more information:

Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "FWS R8 YFWO SECDET 06", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:

Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.