Opportunity Information: Apply for NDRFP13 02
Apply for NDRFP13 02
- The U.S. Mission to India in the education sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "U.S. India School Partnership for Real Communication" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 19.040 Public Diplomacy Programs.
- This funding opportunity was created on May 30, 2013 and posted on May 30, 2013.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Jun 20, 2013. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $46,326.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $46,326.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 1 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Independent school districts Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education Nonprofits that do not have a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education Individuals Public and State controlled institutions of higher education Private institutions of higher education.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The U.S. India School Partnership for Real Communication (Funding Opportunity Number NDRFP13 02, CFDA 19.040 Public Diplomacy Programs) was a U.S. Embassy New Delhi Public Affairs Section grant opportunity posted on May 30, 2013, with applications due June 20, 2013 (by 12:00 midnight Washington, DC time). The program’s central goal was to build sustained, technology-enabled partnerships between individual high schools in India and the United States so students and teachers could collaborate regularly, develop curriculum connections, and form long-term relationships. The concept emphasized practical, real communication across borders, using available digital tools to support ongoing joint work rather than one-off exchanges.
The intended program model linked paired schools for curriculum development partnerships and joint projects tied to an annual theme selected by the U.S. Department of State. Examples of project themes included major global issues such as climate change, innovation, and conflict resolution. A key educational deliverable was creating a platform for American Studies and Indian Studies curriculum development within the partner schools, alongside cultural sharing activities that help participants understand each other’s societies and everyday life. The opportunity envisioned multiple school linkages across “major cities” in both countries; the specific cities, and how many would participate, were to be finalized after consultation with the U.S. Department of State.
The recipient organization was expected to play the coordinating and implementation role end-to-end. That included identifying and recruiting appropriate high schools in the agreed-upon cities; organizing and delivering training workshops so participating schools clearly understood the project structure, responsibilities, and expected outcomes; and providing hands-on support during rollout to address early operational issues. The grantee also had to manage monitoring and evaluation throughout the program, using tools like feedback mechanisms, surveys, and questionnaires, and then submit time-bound midterm and final evaluations to the Department of State. In short, the Embassy was not just funding ideas, but looking for an organization that could operate as the backbone organization for a structured, measurable school partnership network.
Funding was offered as a grant agreement or grant, with award amounts ranging from $10,000 (floor) to $46,326 (ceiling), and an estimated total funding level of $46,326. The Embassy noted it could award less or more than the listed amounts if it served U.S. government interests. Projects were generally expected to be completed in one year or less, although the announcement allowed for the possibility of noncompetitive continuation funding beyond the initial period if funds were available, performance was satisfactory, and continued support aligned with Department of State interests. The opportunity anticipated one award.
Eligibility focused heavily on nonprofit status and relevant experience. The Public Affairs Section stated it would accept applications from U.S. and Indian legally registered not-for-profit NGOs or think tanks that had at least two years of experience working with schools, and that could meet U.S. and/or Indian technical and legal requirements. Applicants were responsible for securing all required registrations in the United States and/or India and ensuring intellectual property rights and related considerations were properly addressed in both countries. While the detailed “EligibleApplicants” list also referenced entities like school districts, higher education institutions, and individuals, the narrative portion emphasized nonprofit NGOs/think tanks with school-focused experience as the primary target applicants.
Applications had to be submitted in English and were required to go through Grants.gov, with an additional email submission to NDGrantApplications@state.gov using a specified subject line that included the applicant organization name and the funding opportunity number. The announcement strongly emphasized early registration because Grants.gov setup could take weeks, especially for non-U.S.-based NGOs, and required obtaining a DUNS number and registering in SAM.gov. Submissions needed to be made by an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR); applications submitted by non-AOR personnel would be rejected in Grants.gov. The package also required Standard Form 424 (SF-424) and a detailed budget with narrative justification, and applicants were encouraged to use the Embassy’s suggested application format and include consistent headers and page numbering.
The proposal itself was expected to be comprehensive and operationally specific. At minimum, applicants needed a cover sheet and a one-page executive summary stating the requested funding amount and project duration, followed by a full project description and justification outlining goals, objectives, and any innovative elements. The Embassy expected resumes for key personnel and partners, clear identification of any cooperating entities or consultants and what they would contribute, and a detailed activities plan explaining how work would be carried out, what might speed up or slow down progress, and why the chosen approach was preferable to alternatives. Applicants also had to present a monitoring and evaluation plan that showed how progress and impact would be tracked, plus a line-item budget that accounted for all costs. Indirect or administrative overhead costs required a specific breakout; if the organization had a federally negotiated indirect cost rate (NICRA), it was expected to be documented.
Proposals were reviewed by a technical panel and evaluated for overall quality, fit, clarity, completeness, and attention to detail, with scoring criteria weighted toward practical capability. Organizational experience and demonstrated understanding of schools in India and the U.S. (including issues like international travel/visa considerations) carried the most weight at 50 points. Organizational capacity to identify schools and manage logistics, plus partner role clarity and staff/financial administration qualifications, counted for 25 points. Monitoring and evaluation accounted for 15 points, and budget and narrative justification for 10 points. Applicants whose proposals were not selected were to be notified by email, and proposals approved but not funded could be kept on file for up to a year for reconsideration if circumstances changed.
Award administration was handled by a Grants Officer, with day-to-day interaction likely through a Grant Officer Representative (GOR). Successful applicants were generally to be notified within 90 days after the submission deadline. Awardees were required to submit both program and financial reports at intervals specified in the grant agreement, and fund disbursement could be tied to timely reporting. Contact for application questions was the Grant Applications Manager at NDGrantApplications@state.gov, with an additional listed point of contact for access issues (Stephanie Morimura, ACAO, U.S. Embassy New Delhi).
FAQs: U.S. India School Partnership for Real Communication (NDRFP13 02)
1) What is the U.S. India School Partnership for Real Communication?
It is a U.S. Embassy New Delhi Public Affairs Section grant opportunity (Funding Opportunity Number NDRFP13 02; CFDA 19.040 Public Diplomacy Programs) designed to build sustained, technology-enabled partnerships between individual high schools in India and the United States. The focus is on practical, ongoing collaboration between students and teachers rather than one-time exchanges.
2) What is the main goal of the program?
The central goal is to create long-term, tech-supported school-to-school partnerships where teachers and students collaborate regularly, build curriculum connections, and develop lasting relationships through real communication across borders.
3) What kinds of activities or program model does the opportunity envision?
The opportunity envisions paired schools working together on curriculum development partnerships and joint projects tied to an annual theme selected by the U.S. Department of State. The model emphasizes ongoing joint work supported by available digital tools.
4) What themes might school projects focus on?
Examples of themes referenced include major global issues such as climate change, innovation, and conflict resolution. The annual theme is selected by the U.S. Department of State.
5) What are the expected educational deliverables?
A key deliverable is establishing a platform for American Studies and Indian Studies curriculum development within the partner schools. The program also includes cultural sharing activities to help participants understand each other’s societies and everyday life.
6) How many schools or cities will be involved?
The opportunity anticipated multiple school linkages across "major cities" in both India and the United States. The specific cities and the number of participating cities/schools were to be finalized after consultation with the U.S. Department of State.
7) Who is expected to run and coordinate the program?
The recipient organization is expected to coordinate and implement the program end-to-end, acting as the backbone organization for a structured school partnership network.
8) What responsibilities would the grantee have?
The grantee is expected to: identify and recruit appropriate high schools in the agreed-upon cities; organize and deliver training workshops so schools understand the structure, responsibilities, and expected outcomes; provide hands-on support during rollout to address early operational issues; manage monitoring and evaluation using tools such as feedback mechanisms, surveys, and questionnaires; and submit time-bound midterm and final evaluations to the Department of State.
9) What is the funding amount for this opportunity?
Award amounts range from $10,000 (floor) to $46,326 (ceiling). The estimated total funding level referenced is $46,326, and the opportunity anticipated one award.
10) Can the U.S. Embassy award more or less than the stated amounts?
Yes. The Embassy noted it could award less or more than the listed amounts if it served U.S. government interests.
11) What is the expected project period?
Projects were generally expected to be completed in one year or less.
12) Is continuation funding possible?
The announcement allowed for the possibility of noncompetitive continuation funding beyond the initial period if funds were available, performance was satisfactory, and continued support aligned with Department of State interests.
13) Who is eligible to apply?
The narrative eligibility focus is on U.S. and Indian legally registered not-for-profit NGOs or think tanks with at least two years of experience working with schools and the ability to meet U.S. and/or Indian technical and legal requirements.
14) Does the opportunity mention other types of eligible applicants?
Yes. The detailed "EligibleApplicants" list also referenced entities such as school districts, higher education institutions, and individuals. However, the narrative portion emphasizes nonprofit NGOs/think tanks with school-focused experience as the primary target applicants.
15) What experience is considered most important in review?
Organizational experience and demonstrated understanding of schools in India and the U.S. (including issues such as international travel/visa considerations) carried the highest weight in scoring.
16) What registrations or compliance items are applicants responsible for?
Applicants are responsible for securing all required registrations in the United States and/or India. The opportunity also highlights the need to ensure intellectual property rights and related considerations are properly addressed in both countries.
17) When was the opportunity posted and when were applications due?
The opportunity was posted on May 30, 2013. Applications were due June 20, 2013 by 12:00 midnight Washington, DC time.
18) How must applications be submitted?
Applications had to be submitted in English through Grants.gov, with an additional email submission to NDGrantApplications@state.gov using a specified subject line that included the applicant organization name and the funding opportunity number.
19) Why does the announcement stress early registration?
Because Grants.gov setup can take weeks, especially for non-U.S.-based NGOs. The process includes obtaining a DUNS number and registering in SAM.gov.
20) Who must submit the application in Grants.gov?
The submission needed to be made by an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR). Applications submitted by non-AOR personnel would be rejected in Grants.gov.
21) What required forms and budget information must be included?
The application package required Standard Form 424 (SF-424) and a detailed budget with narrative justification.
22) Are there formatting or organization suggestions for the application?
Applicants were encouraged to use the Embassy’s suggested application format and include consistent headers and page numbering.
23) What should the proposal include at minimum?
At minimum, the proposal should include: a cover sheet; a one-page executive summary stating the requested funding amount and project duration; a full project description and justification outlining goals, objectives, and any innovative elements; resumes for key personnel and partners; identification of cooperating entities or consultants and their contributions; a detailed activities plan (including factors that could speed up or slow down progress and why the approach is preferable to alternatives); a monitoring and evaluation plan; and a line-item budget accounting for all costs.
24) How should indirect or overhead costs be handled?
Indirect or administrative overhead costs required a specific breakout. If the organization had a federally negotiated indirect cost rate (NICRA), it was expected to be documented.
25) How are proposals reviewed and scored?
Proposals were reviewed by a technical panel and evaluated for overall quality, fit, clarity, completeness, and attention to detail. Scoring criteria were: 50 points for organizational experience and understanding of schools in India and the U.S. (including travel/visa considerations); 25 points for organizational capacity to identify schools and manage logistics, partner role clarity, and staff/financial administration qualifications; 15 points for monitoring and evaluation; and 10 points for budget and narrative justification.
26) How and when are applicants notified of outcomes?
Applicants whose proposals were not selected were to be notified by email. Successful applicants were generally to be notified within 90 days after the submission deadline.
27) What happens to proposals that are approved but not funded?
Proposals approved but not funded could be kept on file for up to a year for reconsideration if circumstances changed.
28) Who administers the award and who is the main federal contact during implementation?
Award administration was handled by a Grants Officer. Day-to-day interaction was likely through a Grant Officer Representative (GOR).
29) What reporting is required after an award is made?
Awardees were required to submit both program and financial reports at intervals specified in the grant agreement, and fund disbursement could be tied to timely reporting.
30) Who can be contacted with application questions or access issues?
Application questions were directed to the Grant Applications Manager at NDGrantApplications@state.gov. An additional point of contact for access issues was listed as Stephanie Morimura (ACAO), U.S. Embassy New Delhi.
Browse more opportunities from the same agency: U.S. Mission to India
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Education
Next opportunity: Innovative Partnerships for Managing Tourism and Recreation in World Heritage Sites and Other Protected Areas
Previous opportunity: National History Day 2013
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for NDRFP13 02
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (NDRFP13 02) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Innovative Partnerships for Managing Tourism and Recreation in World Heritage Sites and Other Protected Areas Apply for P13AS00078 Funding Number: P13AS00078 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $30,000 |
| Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Charter Schools Program Non State Educational Agencies (Non SEA) Planning, Program Design, And Initial Implementation Grant CFDA Number 84.282B Apply for ED GRANTS 061113 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 061113 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Charter Schools Program Non State Educational Agency (Non SEA) Dissemination Grant CFDA Number 84.282C Apply for ED GRANTS 061113 002 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 061113 002 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| OSERS/NIDRR The Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Rehabilitation Strategies, Techniques, and Interventions CFDA Number 84.133E 5 Apply for ED GRANTS 061113 003 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 061113 003 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $925,000 |
| OSERS/NIDRR The Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Information and Communication Technologies Access CFDA Number 84.133E 6 Apply for ED GRANTS 061113 004 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 061113 004 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $925,000 |
| OSERS/NIDRR The Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Individual Mobility and Manipulation CFDA Number 84.133E 7 Apply for ED GRANTS 061113 005 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 061113 005 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $925,000 |
| OSERS/NIDRR The Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers Physical Access and Transportation CFDA Number 84.133E 8 Apply for ED GRANTS 061113 006 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 061113 006 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $925,000 |
| OAH Apply for P13AS00102 Funding Number: P13AS00102 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $120,740 |
| National Association for Interpretation Apply for P13AS00130 Funding Number: P13AS00130 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $35,000 |
| Career Academies Web Development Apply for P13AS00164 Funding Number: P13AS00164 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $145,000 |
| Office of the Deputy Secretary, Department of Education Race to the Top District CFDA Number 84.416 Apply for ED GRANTS 080613 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 080613 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| Interns for Midwest Archeological Center Apply for P13AS00190 Funding Number: P13AS00190 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $41,280 |
| Groundwork Milwaukee Apply for P13AS00213 Funding Number: P13AS00213 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Interns for Yosemite National Park Apply for P13AS00217 Funding Number: P13AS00217 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $42,312 |
| Department of Education and Department of Health and Human Services Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge CFDA Number 84.412A Apply for ED GRANTS 083013 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 083013 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| OSERS NIDRR Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects Centers Program Minority Serving Institution Field Initiated Projects Program CFDA Number 84.133G 4 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 111913 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 111913 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| OSERS NIDRR Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects Centers Program Minority Serving Institution Field Initiated Projects Program CFDA Number 84.133G 5 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 111913 002 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 111913 002 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Community Living and Participation of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 4 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $500,000 |
| Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Community Living and Participation of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 9 (Development) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 002 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 002 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $500,000 |
| Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRPs) Health and Function of Individuals with Disabilities CFDA Number 84.133A 3 (Research) Apply for ED GRANTS 112913 003 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 112913 003 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $500,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants

Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "NDRFP13 02", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.
