Opportunity Information: Apply for RFA 492 12 000005
Apply for RFA 492 12 000005
- The Philippines USAID Manila in the education sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Education Governance Effectiveness (EdGE)" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 98.001 USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas.
- This funding opportunity was created on Aug 13, 2012 and posted on Jul 13, 2012.
- Applicants must submit their applications by Aug 23, 2012. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- The funding agency has allocated a total of $7,800,000.00 to eligible and selected applicants.
- Each selected applicant is eligible to receive up to $7,800,000.00 in funding.
- The number of recipients for this funding is limited to 5 candidate(s).
- Eligible applicants include: Others (see text field entitled Additional Information on Eligibility for clarification).
- Non U.S. Non Governmental Organization / Local Philippine Organization only
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
Opportunity Summary:
The Education Governance Effectiveness (EdGE) grant opportunity was a USAID/Philippines request for applications designed to strengthen how basic education is governed and managed at the school and local government levels across selected cities and municipalities in the Philippines. The core purpose was to improve student learning outcomes, with a particular emphasis on early grade reading. The opportunity was explicitly framed as part of a broader USAID Mission target to improve the reading skills of at least one million young learners, and it was intended to be coordinated with a planned national reading project, meaning EdGE was positioned as a governance-and-systems complement to reading instruction and materials efforts.
EdGE focused on making decentralization in education work better in practice. In the Philippine context, this meant helping translate national education reform goals into effective local implementation by building the capability of key actors who influence school quality and resource use. A major component was support for School-Based Management (SBM), which is a central element of the Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda. Through SBM-related support, the project aimed to improve how schools plan, budget, prioritize, and engage their communities so that day-to-day decisions and resources align more directly with improving classroom outcomes, especially literacy in the early grades.
Another major emphasis was capacity building for Local School Boards and Parent-Teacher Associations. Local School Boards play an important role in local education planning and the allocation or coordination of certain education resources, while PTAs are crucial for community participation, accountability, and mobilizing support for school improvement. By strengthening these groups, the opportunity sought to improve local oversight, transparency, responsiveness to school needs, and sustained community engagement, all of which are commonly linked to better school performance when done well.
The opportunity also highlighted extensive collaboration across government and non-government stakeholders. Implementers were expected to work with the Department of Education (DepED) at both national and local levels and with the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), reflecting the cross-cutting nature of decentralization and local governance. Partnerships were also anticipated with local government units, PTAs, non-government organizations (including community organizations, peoples organizations, and faith-based groups), the private sector, other USAID projects, and other donors. In practical terms, that implies the project was expected to coordinate reforms, avoid duplication, and leverage complementary programs already operating in the education and governance space.
From an awards and administrative standpoint, this was a discretionary funding opportunity using a cooperative agreement, which typically means USAID anticipated substantial involvement during implementation (for example, through collaboration on work planning, monitoring, and key approvals) compared with a standard grant. USAID expected to make up to five awards, with an estimated total funding amount of $7,800,000 and an award ceiling of $7,800,000 (the listing also showed an award floor of $0). Cost sharing or matching was required, meaning applicants needed to contribute some portion of resources or documented value alongside USAID funding.
Eligibility was limited to non-U.S., non-governmental organizations, specifically local Philippine organizations, indicating the program was designed to be locally led and implemented. The funding opportunity number was RFA-492-12-000005, posted July 13, 2012, created August 13, 2012, with an original closing date of August 13, 2012 and a revised closing date of August 23, 2012; it was archived September 12, 2012. The opportunity fell under CFDA 98.001 (USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas). For access issues or inquiries at the time, the contact listed was Franco Joshua Calixto, Acquisition Specialist, reachable via manilaedugov@usaid.gov and phone 552-5691.
Overall, EdGE was structured as a governance-strengthening initiative aimed at improving how education decisions are made and carried out at the local level, with early grade reading improvement as the key outcome driver. Rather than funding stand-alone classroom interventions, it emphasized strengthening the systems, roles, and accountability mechanisms around schools and local education management so that improvements in learning, especially literacy, could be achieved and sustained at scale.
Education Governance Effectiveness (EdGE) Grant (USAID/Philippines) - FAQs
1) What is the Education Governance Effectiveness (EdGE) grant opportunity?
EdGE was a USAID/Philippines request for applications designed to strengthen the governance and management of basic education at the school and local government levels in selected cities and municipalities in the Philippines. It was built around improving how education systems function locally so schools can perform better.
2) What was the main goal of EdGE?
The core purpose was to improve student learning outcomes, with a strong emphasis on early grade reading. EdGE treated improved local governance and management as a key pathway to better literacy outcomes in the early grades.
3) How did early grade reading fit into EdGE?
Early grade reading was the priority outcome driver. EdGE was framed as part of a broader USAID Mission target to improve the reading skills of at least one million young learners. The opportunity positioned EdGE as a governance-and-systems complement to other reading-focused efforts, rather than a stand-alone classroom intervention.
4) Was EdGE intended to coordinate with other USAID or national efforts?
Yes. EdGE was intended to be coordinated with a planned national reading project. This suggests EdGE was meant to align governance reforms and local implementation capacity with reading instruction and materials efforts being pursued through other initiatives.
5) What problem was EdGE trying to address in the Philippine education context?
EdGE focused on making decentralization in education work better in practice. In this context, that meant helping translate national education reform goals into effective local implementation by strengthening the capability of key actors who influence school quality and the use of resources.
6) What is School-Based Management (SBM), and why was it important in EdGE?
School-Based Management (SBM) is a central element of the Philippine Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda. EdGE included SBM-related support to improve how schools plan, budget, prioritize, and engage their communities so that decisions and resources align more directly with improved classroom outcomes, especially early grade literacy.
7) What kinds of school-level improvements was EdGE aiming to strengthen?
Based on the opportunity description, EdGE aimed to strengthen school planning, budgeting, prioritization, and community engagement through SBM approaches, so that routine management decisions and resource use support learning outcomes.
8) Which local groups were specifically emphasized for capacity building?
The opportunity highlighted capacity building for Local School Boards and Parent-Teacher Associations (PTAs). These groups were seen as key to local planning, resource coordination, community participation, and accountability for school improvement.
9) What role do Local School Boards play in this opportunity?
Local School Boards were described as important in local education planning and in the allocation or coordination of certain education resources. Strengthening their capacity was intended to improve local oversight, transparency, responsiveness to school needs, and overall support to school improvement.
10) Why were Parent-Teacher Associations (PTAs) important under EdGE?
PTAs were emphasized because of their role in community participation, accountability, and mobilizing support for school improvement. Strengthened PTAs were expected to help sustain community engagement and reinforce accountability mechanisms that support better school performance.
11) What kinds of partnerships and stakeholders were implementers expected to work with?
Implementers were expected to collaborate extensively across government and non-government stakeholders, including the Department of Education (DepED) at national and local levels, the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG), local government units, PTAs, non-government organizations (including community organizations, peoples organizations, and faith-based groups), the private sector, other USAID projects, and other donors.
12) What did coordination across many stakeholders imply for implementation?
The opportunity indicated implementers were expected to coordinate reforms, avoid duplication, and leverage complementary programs already operating in education and governance. This implies alignment with existing efforts was a core expectation, not an optional add-on.
13) What type of USAID award instrument was used for EdGE?
EdGE used a cooperative agreement under a discretionary funding opportunity. A cooperative agreement typically indicates USAID anticipated substantial involvement during implementation, such as collaboration on work planning, monitoring, and key approvals, compared with a standard grant.
14) How many awards did USAID expect to make?
USAID expected to make up to five awards under this opportunity.
15) What was the estimated total funding amount for EdGE?
The estimated total funding amount was $7,800,000.
16) What was the award ceiling and award floor listed for EdGE?
The listing showed an award ceiling of $7,800,000 and an award floor of $0.
17) Was cost sharing or matching required?
Yes. Cost sharing or matching was required, meaning applicants needed to contribute some portion of resources or documented value alongside USAID funding.
18) Who was eligible to apply?
Eligibility was limited to non-U.S., non-governmental organizations, specifically local Philippine organizations. This indicates the opportunity was designed to be locally led and implemented.
19) What was the funding opportunity number for EdGE?
The funding opportunity number was RFA-492-12-000005.
20) What were the key posting and closing dates for this opportunity?
The opportunity was posted July 13, 2012, created August 13, 2012, with an original closing date of August 13, 2012 and a revised closing date of August 23, 2012. It was archived September 12, 2012.
21) What CFDA number was associated with this opportunity?
The opportunity fell under CFDA 98.001 (USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas).
22) Who was the listed point of contact for questions or access issues?
The contact listed was Franco Joshua Calixto, Acquisition Specialist. The email provided was manilaedugov@usaid.gov and the phone number was 552-5691.
23) Was EdGE focused on stand-alone classroom interventions?
No. The opportunity emphasized strengthening systems, roles, and accountability mechanisms around schools and local education management. The intent was to improve how education decisions are made and carried out at the local level so learning gains, especially literacy gains, can be achieved and sustained at scale.
24) At what levels of the education system did EdGE focus its work?
EdGE targeted the school and local government levels, focusing on governance and management improvements across selected cities and municipalities in the Philippines.
25) Why were DepED and DILG both highlighted as key government counterparts?
The opportunity highlighted collaboration with DepED (national and local) and DILG to reflect the cross-cutting nature of decentralization and local governance. This suggests the work sat at the intersection of education sector management and local governance systems.
Browse more opportunities from the same agency: Philippines USAID Manila
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Education
Next opportunity: Partnership on Womens Entrepreneurship in Clean Energy ( wPOWER)
Previous opportunity: Fiscal Year 2013 NOAA Gulf of Mexico Bay Watershed Education and Training (B WET) Program
USGrants.org Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for RFA 492 12 000005
[Watch] how do funding administrators access proposals?
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (RFA 492 12 000005) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| RRTCs Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) and Developing Strategies for Meet Employer Needs CFDA 84.133B 1 Apply for ED GRANTS 071312 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 071312 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| American Trails Task Agreement Apply for NPS NOI WASOP12AC12447 Funding Number: NPS NOI WASOP12AC12447 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $15,000 |
| Invasive Species Strike Team Apply for F12AS00268 Funding Number: F12AS00268 Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| Model Ione Manzanita Apply for L12AS00178 Funding Number: L12AS00178 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $55,000 |
| ACES and Ecosystem Markets Conference Apply for BLM WO NOI L12AS00185 Funding Number: BLM WO NOI L12AS00185 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Effects of vegetation change on exotic species invasion Apply for L12AS00186 Funding Number: L12AS00186 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $13,000 |
| Mojave Mustard Field Guide Apply for L12AS00187 Funding Number: L12AS00187 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $15,000 |
| Brookwood Sago Mine Safety Grant Apply for SGA12 3BS Funding Number: SGA12 3BS Agency: Mine Safety and Health Administration Category: Education Funding Amount: $250,000 |
| Research and Best Practices for Interpreting Critical Issues Apply for NPS NOI WASOP12AC31026 Funding Number: NPS NOI WASOP12AC31026 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $250,000 |
| Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) American Overseas Research Centers (AORC) Program CFDA Number 84.274A Apply for ED GRANTS 072512 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 072512 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: $65,000 |
| Le Contes Thrasher and Other Special Status/Sensitive Bird Species Apply for L12AS00192 Funding Number: L12AS00192 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| BLUNT NOSED LEOPARD LIZARD HABITAT MODEL Apply for L12AS00195 Funding Number: L12AS00195 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Funding Opportunity Announcement, Nuclear Education Curricula Development Grant, Fiscal Year 2013 Apply for HR FN 0712 EDU7 Funding Number: HR FN 0712 EDU7 Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Category: Education Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) State Tribal Education Partnership (STEP) Pilot CFDA Number 84.415A Apply for ED GRANTS 072612 001 Funding Number: ED GRANTS 072612 001 Agency: Department of Education Category: Education Funding Amount: Case Dependent |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), Faculty Development Grant, Fiscal Year 2013 Apply for HR FN 0712 NED02 Funding Number: HR FN 0712 NED02 Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Category: Education Funding Amount: $450,000 |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Funding Opportunity Announcement, Scholarship and Fellowship Education Grant, Fiscal Year 2013 Apply for HR FN 0712 NED01 Funding Number: HR FN 0712 NED01 Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Category: Education Funding Amount: $400,000 |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Funding Opportunity Announcement, Trade School and Community College Scholarship Grant, Fiscal Year 2013 Apply for HR FN 0712 NED03 Funding Number: HR FN 0712 NED03 Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Category: Education Funding Amount: $150,000 |
| Golden Eagle Genetic Deomgraphy Study Apply for L12AS00200 Funding Number: L12AS00200 Agency: Bureau of Land Management Category: Education Funding Amount: $300,000 |
| American Hiking Society National Trails Day Apply for NPS NOIWASOR2230120025 Funding Number: NPS NOIWASOR2230120025 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $5,000 |
| American Hiking Society Youth Outreach Apply for NPS NOI WASO R2230120026 Funding Number: NPS NOI WASO R2230120026 Agency: National Park Service Category: Education Funding Amount: $5,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Subscribe to Leads
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "RFA 492 12 000005", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.